|
Cannabis roundup
Friday, May 24, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller * ¯\_(ツ)_/¯…
* I took a polite pass on this poll yesterday…
First of all, it’s totally false to claim the poll shows “A solid majority of Illinois residents” favor anything. It says no such thing and the pollster himself does not even make this claim. The poll also doesn’t show regional sentiment. The above story is a complete misreading of the actual results. This is not a statewide poll. It’s a survey of 600 people scattered over nine of 118 House districts divided into three regions of 200 respondents each. Those four “Northern” districts would have just 50 respondents per district. I just didn’t think it provided worthwhile numbers, so I passed. * Related…
|
|
Fun with numbers
Thursday, May 23, 2019 - Posted by Rich Miller * There’s so much to unpack in this…
First, the governor’s motor fuel tax increase would bring in $560 million a year, not $1.2 billion (although a commenter points out correctly that another big chunk collected by the state would go to local municipalities). And, sorry, but imposing new or higher taxes and licensing fees on things people choose to do, like smoke cigarettes, bet on sports or play video gaming machines, buy cannabis, or whatever, does not strike me as particularly egregious. …Adding… As a commenter notes, the Illinois Policy Institute published a recent story entitled “Illinois can spend another $10B on infrastructure without tax hikes.” In that story, “legalized sports betting” is identified as a non-tax way to help pay for it. Yet, that revenue is identified above as taxation. * But here’s John Tillman in a Tribune op-ed bemoaning all those taxes…
Pritzker’s a bully? Tillman’s explanation…
Heaven forfend, it’s a… it’s a press release! It’s also downright tame compared to how the Policy Institute has weaponized its Facebook page. I love this part…
He claims school consolidation would save $2.9 billion over five years, which means the pension cost shift to local school districts would free up $9.3 billion, or close to $2 billion a year. The very next paragraph…
They’re gonna be paying even higher property taxes if they have to start picking up $2 billion a year in pension costs. Also, how would limiting automatic raises for state workers help local property taxpayers? * Meanwhile, from Politico…
* I took a pass on this poll yesterday. Why? Here’s the question…
That “basic information” is more than just a little leading, if you ask me.
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |







