|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Don’t be too quick to judge
Friday, Feb 22, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller * Be really careful when reading these poll results, which are not being read at all carefully elsewhere…
* OK, first, this is a poll of residents, not even registered voters. * Second, while the statewide results may actually be valid, the Chicago subset is just way too small to make any sort of claim about the mayor’s poll ratings. Chicago’s population is 21 percent of the state’s. So, if the poll was properly balanced, that would mean only about 126 people were polled. That’s a margin of error of about 9 percent. There’s just no way to make a realistic judgment about a situation based on that small of a polling universe. Period. * From Crain’s…
Internet polling gets a bad rap, but it is picking up some admirers. Even so, a purely Internet poll is kinda radical. * A coverage sample…
*** UPDATE *** I should’ve known to check Drudge. So, with a hat tip to a commenter… ![]() Cue Kass in 3… 2… 1…
|
|
Is it all but over?
Friday, Feb 22, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller * From a Roll Call article on the 2nd Congressional District special primary, entitled “All Signs Point to Kelly Victory in Illinois Special Election”…
Subscribers know more about recent polling. Also…
* Meanwhile, there’s been an attempt to try to link Mayor Emanuel to Kelly’s race. For instance…
That’s some conspiracy theory. Bloomberg spent money all over the country last year. I doubt he asked permission to do so anywhere else. This, by the way, is Axelrod’s alleged tweet on behalf of Kelly…
It was much more a knock on Halvorson, whom the Obama people obviously don’t want to win this contest.
|
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Friday, Feb 22, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Friday, Feb 22, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |








