Question of the day
Wednesday, May 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From a Peoria Journal Star headline…
Philanthropist Bruce Rauner…
* The Question: What one word would you use to describe Rauner and other potential gubernatorial candidates?
List as many as you want. Have fun.
82 Comments
|
* Actually, he didn’t threaten to do anything except to consider the idea…
Chicago Cubs Chairman Tom Ricketts for the first time threatened to move the team out of Wrigley Field if it doesn’t receive government approval for more signs in the outfield, including a giant video scoreboard.
“I’m not sure how anyone is going to stop the signs in the outfield, but if it comes to the point that we don’t have the ability to do what we need to do in our outfield then we’re going to have to consider moving,” Ricketts said at Wednesday morning event at the City Club of Chicago where he was the guest speaker. “It’s a simple as that.”
Plus, he was responding to a hypothetical question of “What if opponents stop the signs in the outfield?” The various sides hashed out a framework a couple of weeks ago that includes signage.
Watch the video…
View more videos at: http://nbcchicago.com
And, besides, if they did move, who would go to the games to just watch that team play?
49 Comments
|
Worst. Law. Ever. #Fail
Wednesday, May 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The highly controversial STAR Bonds bill was supposed to spark a huge retail revival in the Marion area. Under the law, the developer would get to keep the first 20 years of sales tax revenues which would normally go to state and local governments. That revenue stream could then be used to finance the project.
The original plan was to put the STAR Bonds district in Glen Carbon, in the thick of an already existent Madison County retail explosion. Local opposition stopped that plan in its tracks, so the General Assembly kept the concept alive by moving it to Marion, which is by Carbondale.
Three years later, nothing has happened. And the developer pulled out this week…
Bruce Holland of Millennium Development LLC resigned from the STAR Bond project in a letter to city officials Monday, according to Mayor Bob Butler.
The letter, a short one paragraph, gave no explanation as to why the developer was walking away, said Butler. […]
Butler said the city has another developer seriously considering taking over the project. An official decision could be made in the next 10 days to two weeks Butler said.
* The developer’s excuse…
Holland said that after three years, few retailers have come forward expressing interest in the development. He said representatives from Bass Pro Shop and Nebraska Furniture Mart initially visited the proposed site. Bass Pro Shop was interested in the site, Holland said, but the lingering effects of the recession have apparently thwarted any further large retail development for the time being.
“In fact, the retail industry is still somewhat in recession,” Holland said. “You don’t see any big-box users being built in the last few years.”
Um, OK. I guess the massive Scheels outdoor and sporting goods store which opened in Springfield two years ago was a mirage, as was the gigantic new Menard’s “super store” that opened here last month. Both of those stores, by the way, are not in STAR Bonds districts.
While Holland’s failure is bad news for Marion, there is a bright side.
Look, we most definitely need to help spur economic development, but this STAR Bonds thing is dangerous. We already have a huge fiscal problem. Giving up state sales tax revenue streams in order to spur development that will likely hurt retailers in surrounding areas is just not a good idea, particularly if it spreads all over the state, like TIF districts have.
* Related…
* Grundfos to move North American headquarters to Chicago area
* My boss wants my Facebook password? - Illinois moves to legalise employer access to workers’ accounts
* New software is automating digital health records — and saving clinics a fortune
* Passenger rail car maker Nippon Sharyo grows in Rochelle
* ComEd’s “Smart Switches” Reducing Service Interruptions
21 Comments
|
“Evolving” positions
Wednesday, May 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Back in March, the Chicago Tribune editorialized against a provision in the Nekritz/Cross/Biss pension reform proposal that guaranteed the state would make its pension payments in the future…
One caveat on Biss’ bill: It includes unfortunate language that would put the state on the hook for regular payments into the pension funds as a contractual obligation. That’s a worthy commitment, but also one stronger and more enforceable than what’s now in state law. Which makes it a precarious requirement that we hope the House will eliminate.
Well, Speaker Madigan’s new pension bill has even stronger pension payment guarantees than the NCB bill. From the HDem analysis…
If the State fails to make a required payment under the funding schedule or fails to contribute the additional $1 billion promised above, the systems will have a right to bring a mandamus action to compel the State to make the payment. Each Board will have a fiduciary duty to bring an action if necessary. Payments compelled under this provision are expressly subordinate to the state’s debt service obligations.
* So, what did the Tribune say today? Well, they didn’t even mention the pension payment guarantee in their editorial and enthusiastically endorsed the bill…
We hope to see swift approval in the House.
* Meanwhile, the governor has “evolved” yet again…
“This is the way forward,” said Brooke Anderson, spokeswoman for Gov. Pat Quinn, who has promoted several elements in the Madigan plan. “This is the fastest way to pension reform.”
Since the beginning of this year, Quinn has backed Senate President John Cullerton’s SB1, laid out his own “fundamental elements” that were promptly ignored [Adding: MJM’s bill includes pretty much everything in those elements, however], backed Madigan’s three pension bills that passed the House as the best approach to reform, and now has endorsed the Madigan bill.
* From the We Are One Coalition statement on Madigan’s bill…
we want to work together to solve the pension problem
But…
Cullerton said earlier Tuesday that he is continuing to meet with union representatives in an attempt to reach a compromise. However, in an email Tuesday, union representatives said the chance of reaching an agreement “at this time looks dim.””
Hmm.
* The biggest unanswered question, however, is what Senate President John Cullerton will do if and/or when Madigan’s bill passes the House. The two men have long been at loggerheads over how to proceed. Greg Hinz has the statement…
“The speaker and Cullerton have the same goal with different approaches,” the statement says. “Cullerton has worked to build consensus for a plan that is clearly constitutional. To that end he has sought to work with Republicans, members of his caucus and labor leaders. Those efforts will continue this week.”
Then comes the knife:
“The roll call on SB 35 may be instructive to those who are guessing at how unilateral pension changes will fare in the Senate,” adds the statement, referring to an earlier bill that is quite similar to Mr. Madigan’s new proposal. That bill “only received 23 yes votes,” well short of the 30 needed.
Ms. Phelon concludes on a more moderate note, saying, “There is an increasing urgency that the General Assembly finalize some action on this issue.” But the test of wills surely looks like it’s on. If Mr. Madigan’s bill passes the House, will Mr. Cullerton refuse to call it for a vote in the Senate, like Mr. Madigan now is doing with Mr. Cullerton’s S.B. 1 by amending it to his liking?
* More…
In a state Senate hearing earlier Tuesday, Cullerton pushed back against deep pension cuts proposed by state Sen. Jim Oberweis, a Sugar Grove Republican. The Illinois Constitution says pension benefits can’t be diminished.
“We’re not making this stuff up,” Cullerton said. “This is a constitution.”
The unions had better get to the table soon.
* And even Speaker Madigan is evolving…
Madigan left out a plan to make suburban and Downstate school districts pick up the state’s tab for paying the pensions of retired teachers and school administrators, which he had identified as a top priority.
Brown said that issue could resurface before the scheduled close of the spring legislative session May 31.
54 Comments
|
* Despite the introduction late last week of a supplemental appropriations bill to fund back pay owed by the state, AFSCME sent out this press release late yesterday afternoon…
Caregivers for the disabled, child protection workers and prison employees are just some of the nearly 40,000 frontline employees of Illinois state government who will vote again on whether to go forward with a new union contract with the Quinn Administration.
The state employees’ union, AFSCME Council 31, announced today that a new vote is required since the first tally was based on the administration’s commitment to drop its appeal of a court decision. In that case, the judge ruled that the state is obligated to honor the prior union contract and owes employees back wages withheld since July 2011.
Governor Quinn has asked that the appeal be dropped, but the authority rests with Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who has refused to do so.
“Tens of thousands of state employees have been denied their rightful wages for nearly two years,” AFSCME Council 31 executive director Henry Bayer said. “The court has ruled, correctly, that the state must honor the prior union contract, and that employees are owed their back pay. We think the appeal should be dropped and the matter put to rest. Since the earlier vote was based on assurances that the appeal would be withdrawn, union members have a right to re-vote now.”
The union and the Quinn Administration are urging lawmakers to approve an appropriation to pay the back wages. Passage of that measure would make the court case moot.
* Attorney General Madigan wasn’t moved. Her office’s response…
Until the legislature decides whether to appropriate funding to pay the raises, it would be premature to dismiss the state’s appeal. If the state dismissed the appeal before the legislature decides whether to appropriate the money, that would take a legal option off the table for the state.
Ultimately, this is a funding issue for the legislature, the Governor’s office and AFSCME to work out through the budget process.
Our putting the appeal on hold for now does not impact the state’s ability to fund the raises.
* From the SJ-R…
A $145 million supplemental budget bill has been introduced in the House that would provide enough money to pay the back wages. There is no timetable for lawmakers to act on it.
House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, believes the past due wages fall into the same category as old state bills and can be paid with tax revenue that came in higher than expected last year, said his spokesman Steve Brown.
AFSCME spokesman Anders Lindall said 40,000 AFSCME members will revote on the contract over the next two weeks. If union members reject the agreement this time, it could be back to the start.
“In any negotiation, if any party does not ratify an agreement, then no contract is in place,” Lindall said. “The parties could return to the (bargaining) table.”
* AFSCME also laid out the choices for its members in an e-mail yesterday and recommended a “Yes” vote…
Voting will get underway right away at worksites across the state. Members will have the opportunity to decide whether to affirm the ratification vote that was previously taken and move forward with signing the contract or to refuse to sign the contract.
If the membership votes YES, to sign the contract:
* Employees will be placed at their appropriate salary level (with either a 2% or 7.25% increase) effective July 1, 2013.
* AFSCME and the Quinn Administration will continue to work toward passage of HB 212, the supplemental appropriation that would provide funds to pay all back wages owed to employees per the previous contract. If the supplemental is enacted so that the back wages can be paid, then the lawsuit will effectively become moot since that is the issue before the court.
* All terms and conditions of the union contract would be in effect.
If the membership votes NO, not to sign the contract:
* The salary increases (either 2% or 7.25%) scheduled for July 1 would not go into effect.
* The union contract will not be in effect.
* The Administration will not have to uphold its commitment to lobby in support of the supplemental appropriation for the back pay, though the Union would continue to do so.
* The Union or Management could seek to return to the bargaining table.
The AFSCME Bargaining Committee recommends a YES vote to sign the contract at this time and to move forward to lobby vigorously for passage of the supplemental appropriation.
Thoughts?
29 Comments
|
Credit Union (noun) – an essential financial cooperative
Wednesday, May 1, 2013 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Cooperatives can be formed to support producers such as farmers, purchasers such as independent business owners, and consumers such as electric coops and credit unions. Their primary purpose is to meet members’ needs through affordable goods and services of high quality. Cooperatives such as credit unions may look like other businesses in their operations and, like other businesses, can range in size. However, the cooperative structure is distinctively different regardless of size. As not-for-profit financial cooperatives, credit unions serve individuals with a common goal or interest. They are owned and democratically controlled by the people who use their services. Their board of directors consists of unpaid volunteers, elected by and from the membership. Members are owners who pool funds to help other members. After expenses and reserve requirements are met, net revenue is returned to members via lower loan and higher savings rates, lower costs and fees for services. It is the structure of credit unions, not their size or range of services that is the reason for their tax exempt status - and the reason why almost three million Illinois residents are among 95 million Americans who count on their local credit union everyday to reach their financial goals.
Comments Off
|
Madigan’s preamble
Wednesday, May 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* One of the most interesting aspects of House Speaker Michael Madigan’s pension reform proposal is the preamble…
“Section 1. Statement and Findings.
At the time of passage of this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly, Illinois possesses a lower credit rating than each of the other 49 states. This is a consequence both of atypically large debts and of structural imbalances that will, unless addressed by the General Assembly, lead to rapidly growing debts. The debts include a backlog of bills exceeding one-fourth of the State’s annual general revenue, substantial unfunded liabilities associated with health insurance for employees and retirees, and approximately $100 billion in unfunded pension liabilities. The structural imbalances result from projected growth in non-discretionary and formula-driven expenses that significantly outpace projected revenue growth. Of the factors that drive this phenomenon, the most substantialby far is the rapid growth of the annual pension payment, which increased nearly $1 billion between Fiscal Year 2012 and Fiscal Year 2013, and will again increase nearly $1 billion between Fiscal Year 2013 and Fiscal Year 2014, at which time it will consume approximately one-fifth of anticipated general revenue.
The depth of this financial crisis became clear in 2008, and since that time, the State has taken significant action to ameliorate the State’s fiscal troubles. In 2011, the State increased the income tax by sixty-seven percent in Public Act 96-1496. Recognizing that increased revenue alone would not solve the problem, the State has enacted a series of budgets that included deep cuts to nearly every discretionary program, including areas of the budget that are essential in order to provide for the health, safety, welfare, and educational development of the people of Illinois, such as public elementary, secondary, and higher education, human services, and public safety.
The State has both reduced the size of its workforce and reduced discretionary spending. Staffing levels have reduced from more than 65,000 in 2001 to the current level of nearly 44,500. The staffing level is now the lowest it has been in at least the last 25 years. Discretionary spending from the General Revenue Fund (GRF) has been reduced by over $2.8 billion since Fiscal Year 2009, including reductions for primary education of nearly $1 billion, higher education of over $230 million, public safety of over $200 million, and human services, including health care for the poor, of nearly $1.3 million. These reductions have occurred in spite of the rising costs of goods and services, which are particularly high in the area of medical goods and services, which is a significant area of state spending.
In 2010, Public Act 96-889 established a package of pension benefits for new employees that has been determined to be among the least expensive public employee retirement schemes in the country. It can be argued that the new package of pension benefits has placed government employers at a competitive disadvantage, and our public universities, which are vital educational and economic institutions, have been exposed to a significant risk.
In the spring of 2012, the General Assembly made significant reductions to the Medicaid program, passage of Public Acts 97-687, 97-688, 97-689, 97-690, 97-691, a series of reforms to the Medicaid program that is projected to reduce State debt by over $2.5 billion each year by decreasing services, increasing the rate of taxation of cigarette purchases, and accessing available federal funds. The reductions include the elimination of a prescription drug program for low to middle income seniors, across the board provider rate cuts, elimination of health care for adults whose families make above 133% of the federal poverty limit ($31,322 for a family of four), elimination of restorative dental treatments for adults covered by Medicaid, and utilization limits on all remaining services covered by Medicaid. While the Medicaid reforms will result in savings for the State, these reforms have resulted in the denial of crucial health care to hundreds of thousands of needy citizens, threatening to further destabilize an already-troubled safety net.
The General Assembly took significant steps to reduce the cost of current and retired employee health care costs. With Public Act 97-695, the General Assembly eliminated provisions that require that retired state employees with more than 20 years of service receive a 100% premium subsidy for retiree health care coverage after 20 years of service. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2014,
State employees will be required to contribute significantly more toward healthcare premiums, copays, and deductibles. These changes to healthcare will result in an estimated savings of more than $900 million over the next two fiscal years. However, the backlog of payments to providers is estimated to be nearly $1.8 billion at the end of Fiscal Year 2013, and providers will experience a delayed payment cycle of up to 14 months.
Notwithstanding these many steps and their major fiscal, economic, and human impact, the fiscal situation in Illinois continues to deteriorate. Cuts as well as the inability to pay bills due and owing has had a significant impact on each branch of government, units of local government, social service providers, and other vendors.
Two-thirds of Illinois school districts are in a budget deficit, even after massive layoffs and programmatic reductions. For Fiscal Year 2013, General State Aid payments to school districts are currently being prorated at 89% of the calculated amount. For Fiscal Year 2014, the Governor’s introduced level of General State Aid payments would result in a proration of 82%.
Illinois human service providers are experiencing extraordinary fiscal pressures, leading to deficit spending, discontinued programs, and, increasingly, bankruptcies.
On January 19, 2012, the Jane Addams Hull House Association, one of the oldest and most renowned human service agencies in the country, founded by the first Illinoisan to win a Nobel Peace Prize, announced it would close due to financial difficulties. These manifold challenges have exposed the people of Illinois to very substantial harm.
Cuts to the budget of the Department of Corrections have resulted in the closing of two major prisons and three Adult Transitional Centers. Similarly, the Department of Juvenile Justice was forced to close two youth centers. Funding for probation services to help break the cycle of recidivism and improve public safety have steadily declined over the past 5 years due to the fiscal strain on the state budget. For Fiscal Year 2014, the Supreme Court has requested an appropriation to meet statutory probation service requirements of $101,229,500; however, the Governor has proposed an appropriation of $47,140,000 - that’s 53% less than necessary to fund probation services required under law.
Illinois has failed to invest the necessary resources to maintain a viable transportation plan in recent years. By year 2018, nearly 1 in every 3 miles of roads and 1 in every 10 bridges will be in an unacceptable condition. Recent reports have shown that roughly 8% of bridges in Illinois are structurally deficient and 7% of bridges are functionally obsolete. Illinois has not been able to invest the necessary dollars for state and local roads which has led roughly 73% of the roads in the state to be in poor or mediocre condition.
The State’s credit rating has consistently worsened in the assessment of all three major ratings agencies, the State’s backlog of unpaid bills has not grown smaller, and the various non-discretionary and formula-driven expenses whose growth has created the lion’s share of the problem are projected to continue unabated. Under the current payment schedule set in Public Act 88-593, the pension payment especially is expected to grow extremely rapidly until Fiscal Year 2045.
Consequently, the coming months and years will necessarily see much more action by the State to achieve fiscal stabilization. If these steps toward fiscal stabilization do not include pension reform to restrain the growth of the annual pension payment, the result will be devastating and dramatic cuts to education, public safety, and transportation. The impact of such actions on the Illinois economy, and on the health, safety, welfare, and educational development of the people would likely be extremely severe. This harm could include significant economic contraction, which would in turn exacerbate the underlying fiscal challenge, resulting in a downward spiral of standard of living and likely leading to an eventual inability of the state to meet its short term statutory and Constitutional responsibilities.
The State has experienced well-documented pension debt problems for many decades. Throughout this time, General Assemblies and Governors have struggled to find workable solutions. On several occasions, most notably in the instances of Public Acts 88-593 and 96-889, reform efforts were heralded as comprehensive fixes; these claims have in each instance been disproven over time.
The inadequacy of past reform efforts has resulted from two phenomena. First, reforms have instituted actuarially unsound funding schedules that masked the depth of the problem by deferring payments far into the future. Indeed, this practice led to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s charging of Illinois with securities fraud in March 2013. Second, steps that were taken to reduce costs or generate funds to make pension payments were insufficient to make it feasible for the State to meet an actuarially sound funding schedule. Simply put, reform efforts left the State with an unaffordable pension liability, and in order to mask this, the State instituted artificial and ultimately ruinous funding schedules.
The General Assembly has held numerous hearings and reviewed hundreds of documents detailing the problem, probable solutions, and constitutional issues with proposed reform. Given that and all of the above:
The General Assembly finds that the fiscal crisis in the State of Illinois jeopardizes the health, safety, and welfare of the people and compromises the ability to maintain a representative and orderly government.
The General Assembly finds that the pension debt is so great, and the State’s fiscal condition is so challenged, that it is unclear whether any set of actions by the State that do not include substantial reforms to its pension systems can result in the full payment of all promised benefits.
The General Assembly finds that in order to truly solve the State’s pension problem, a reform measure must render the pension liability affordable on an actuarially sound funding schedule, and it must, in a binding fashion, commit the State to maintaining this schedule.
The General Assembly finds that the reforms in this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly are necessary to address the fiscal crisis without incurring further severe and irreparable harm to the public welfare.
The General Assembly finds that this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly constitutes the substantial reform of the State’s pension systems that, along with a series of further steps toward fiscal stabilization, will enable the State to credibly promise the full payment of all pension benefits without incurring unacceptable harm to other areas of State interest.
The General Assembly finds that this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly, with its significant cost-savings, its institution of an actuarially accepted payment schedule, and its historic and binding funding guarantee, is necessary and sufficient in order to meet these goals and solve the State’s pension problem. [Emphasis added.]
Discuss.
69 Comments
|
* Click here or here to watch the live video of this morning’s House Personnel and Pensions Committee meeting. The hearing started at 8:30 this morning. Discuss below.
*** UPDATE *** This was distributed to House Democrats yesterday to explain Madigan’s pension proposal…
Speaker Madigan’s Pension Proposal – HA #1 to Senate Bill 1
House Amendment #1 to Senate Bill 1 is a comprehensive package that will stabilize and bring solvency to 4 of the State’s pension funds (GARS, SERS, SURS, and TRS). This package will ensure the State meets its obligations to the pension systems by adopting an actuarially accepted payment schedule, providing an enforceable funding guarantee, and altering benefits for current and prospective annuitants. The concepts in this package are not new, and several have been approved by the House.
1) New funding schedule. The new schedule requires the systems to reach 100% funding in 30 years, beginning in FY 15 and ending 2044.
2) New method for certifying contributions. Beginning in FY 15, contributions will be certified using the entry age normal actuarial cost method (“EAN”) instead of the projected unit credit actuarial method (“PUC”). The PUC method, which the systems currently use, requires higher contributions closer to retirement. The EAN method averages costs evenly over the pensioner’s employment, thereby resulting in more level contributions. This change was approved by the House in HB 1277 (Senger).
3) Supplemental contributions beginning in FY 20. The State currently makes payments on pension obligation notes from 2010 and 2011, and in 2019, the State will make a final payment of $952 million. Once those payments end, the State commits to annually contribute $1 billion in addition to the state’s scheduled contributions to the state-funded systems. The additional contributions will continue until all systems reach their funding goal.
4) Provide a funding guarantee. If the State fails to make a required payment under the funding schedule or fails to contribute the additional $1 billion promised above, the systems will have a right to bring a mandamus action to compel the State to make the payment. Each Board will have a fiduciary duty to bring an action if necessary. Payments compelled under this provision are expressly subordinate to the state’s debt service obligations.
5) Establish a pensionable salary cap for Tier I employees. The amendment applies the Tier II salary cap to Tier I employees. For 2013, the salary cap was $109,971. The cap will increase annually by ½ the consumer price index for urban consumers. There is a grandfather clause for those employees with salaries that currently exceeds the cap or will exceed the cap based on raises due to the person under a current collective bargaining agreement. Under the proposal, a person whose salary exceeds the salary cap is only eligible for an annuity based on the salary cap.
6) New method of calculating the COLA. Retired members will keep the compounded 3% annual increases they received up until the enactment, but future COLAs will be calculated differently. Going forward, the COLA will be based on 3% of a maximum annuity amount based on their years of service. The cap will be $1,000 for each year the employee had worked ($800 for those coordinated with Social Security). As an example, an individual retiring with 30 years of service will have a COLA of 3% of $30,000 or $900, which accumulates annually. If a person’s initial annuity is under this threshold, that person will continue receiving a 3% compounded adjustment based on their initial annuity until they reach the cap. This adjustment was originally proposed by Senator Radogno and incorporated in Senate Amendment #4 to SB 35.
Additionally, current and future retirees would have the first or next year in which they can receive their COLA delayed. Retirees who are age 67 and older would be unaffected by this delay. Those under age 67 would have their COLA paused until either they reach age 67 or until the 5th anniversary of their retirement, whichever comes first.
7) Increase the retirement age for employees under 45 years old. The amendment raises the retirement age, on a graduated scale, for current Tier I members who are under 45 years old (no change for those 45 years of age or older). This language was approved by the House in HB1166 (Madigan) and is included in the Cross-Nekritz pension reform package (HB 3411).The retirement age is increased by the following schedule:
• Age 40 to 44 – additional 1 year added to the applicable system’s minimum retirement age;
• Age 35 to 39 – additional 3 years added; and
• Below 35 – additional 5 years added.
8) Increase employee contributions by 2%. Beginning July 1, 2013, employees will be required to contribute an additional 1%, and this is increased to 2% on July 1, 2014.
9) Eliminate the subject of pensions for collective bargaining. Bargaining units and employers with participants in the State systems would be prohibited from negotiating changes related to pensions.
10) Fix the COLA for Tier II members of GARS. Under current law, the General Assembly and Judges’ Retirement systems have their salary cap and annuity increased by the lesser of CPI or 3%. All other systems have their salary cap and annuity increased by the lesser of one-half of CPI or 3%. This draft lowers the General Assembly Retirement System down to one-half of CPI to bring it in line with other systems.
11) Prohibit non-governmental organizations from participating in State systems. The amendment prevents new employees of several “non-governmental” organizations from participating under IMRF, SURS, and TRS. Additionally, it prohibits new employees of all state systems from using sick time or vacation time in calculating their annuity.
12) Change the effective rate of interest. The amendment suggests that the Comptroller adopt a more conservative number for what is known as the “effective rate of interest” (“ERI”). Under current law, the ERI determines benefits for university and community college employees hired before 2005. The amendment still provides that the Comptroller set this rate, but advises a figure that will more appropriately determine benefits for certain participants.
13) Prohibit the use of pension funds to pay costs associated with healthcare. The amendment makes clear that the state funded pension systems are not to use retirement contributions for the purpose of subsidizing the cost of retiree healthcare.
14) Require separate appropriation request for employer normal cost and amortization of the unfunded liability. The Governor must introduce and the systems must certify these costs separately.
27 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I’ve seen Senate President Pro Tempore Don Harmon play guitar. I’ve gone to several gigs by Reps. Mike Tryon and Chad Hays (although I missed last night’s performance). I didn’t know that Rep. Martwick played in a band, however…
Robert F. Martwick, Illinois House of Representative, 19th District, sported a different persona Sat., Apr. 27, when he and the Chris N group rocked in Phyllis’ Musical Inn, 1800 W. Division St.
While Martwick tucked the guitar away when he was close to 9-years-old and when years later he told his bride that he wasn’t going to run for a political office again, Saturday night was proof that life can take unexpected turns.
The photo…
* The Question: Caption?
28 Comments
|
* 11:58 am - House Speaker Michael Madigan has filed a pension reform proposal. I’m still going through it, but I’m sure our pension experts out there can help figure out what’s in it. Click here to read the amendment (which was tacked onto Senate President Cullerton’s SB1) and make sure to comment below.
* 12:17 pm - I was given a quick briefing on the bill. Here are some of the highlights, but overall it’s somewhat pretty close to the Nekritz/Cross bill…
* The Tier 3 and cost shift language from Nekritz/Cross are out;
* COLA change is a “bit less onerous.” Instead of basing compounded COLA on only the first $25K of salary at retirement, this would provide a formula of $1k per year of service. So, if somebody worked 30 years, then the first $30K would qualify for compounded COLAs;
* The proposal’s Social Security wage cap is slightly lower than Nekritz/Cross. The cap is tied to the Tier 2 level. So, now the cap is $109k, which is a few grand lower and will grow more slowly;
* Retirement age, employee contribution levels are the same as Nekritz/Cross;
* State funding guarantee language is stronger than Nekritz/Cross - basically the same commitment as made to the bond houses.
107 Comments
|
Fuel taxes and speed limits
Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Tom Kacich reports…
Facing dwindling revenue from the state gasoline tax, the Transportation for Illinois Coalition will propose new motor fuel fees in May, an official with the group said Monday.
Among the possibilities being considered, said Jennifer Morrison, managing director of the coalition, are a surcharge on electric and hybrid vehicles and moving away from a per-gallon tax (now 19 cents a gallon) to a percentage-based tax that would bring in more money as the price of fuel increases. Morrison’s organization is a coalition of business, labor and transit groups interested in transportation funding issues.
Gov. Pat Quinn’s Illinois Jobs Now program is winding down, Morrison said, and the motor fuel tax, which funds state and local road projects, “is stagnant and declining, and at the same time, there is a dramatic increase in the cost of construction. That terrible dynamic (causes) … the incredibly diminished purchasing power of the motor fuel tax.
“Obviously, that’s not sustainable going forward. Cars are going to get increasingly fuel-efficient and are mandated to do so. We need to do something to fix that structural problem and investment in transportation.”
Switching the motor fuel tax to a percentage tax from a gallonage tax is a huge ask, to say the least. A couple of reacts…
In order to afford those projects, lawmakers will look for places where the state is losing revenue. Representative Mike Bost says truckers are avoiding Illinois because of its higher gas tax and the state needs to try other techniques to bring in their business.
“That’s why we still need to maintain a sensible, competitive rate, for encouraging travel through the state of Illinois and we are losing a lot of those dollars that way,” explains Bost.
Representative Brandon Phelps says Chicago lawmakers want a bigger portion of the state’s transportation fund. Right now, it’s a 55/45 split favoring downstate projects. He says Chicago lawmakers want a 50/50 split.
“We can’t afford to let that happen,” says Phelps.
Translation: No higher taxes.
* Meanwhile, AAA is opposed to raising the speed limit to 70 mph…
“The Illinois legislature should not ignore the enormous speeding problem Illinois already has on its roadways,” said Brad Roeber, president of AAA Chicago. “Speeding accounts for more than half of Illinois’ over 900 roadway fatalities, and this problem cannot be fixed by letting cars and trucks travel faster.”
The data on speeding are clear. From 2008-2011, Illinois’ roadway fatalities dropped 12 percent; but those fatalities due to speeding rose nearly 14 percent. Furthermore, in 2010 and 2011, Illinois speed limits for large trucks were raised to 65 mph. Over this time, there has been a 39 percent increase in fatalities involving large trucks.
* But the SJ-R argues that “There is no good argument for keeping Illinois’ speed limit at 65 under the parameters outlined in the bill”…
Well, on Illinois’ rural interstates, the majority of drivers actually are traveling well over 65 mph — more like 70 to 75 mph. We’ve all seen it. Drive 65 or slower on I-55 and you run the risk of being blown off the highway, honked at or rudely gestured to. […]
Sen. Jim Oberweis, R-Sugar Grove, who sponsored the bill, said he doesn’t believe people who already speed now will just drive even faster if the limit is raised.
“I really don’t think so,” he said. “In fact, I would be willing to support a tighter enforcement of the speed limit.”
We agree with Oberweis. If officials are concerned about excessive speeding and the possible repercussions, we encourage the Illinois State Police and other law enforcement agencies to crack down on speeding on the interstates and send a message that flouting the state’s speed limit won’t be tolerated.
The speed limit is almost always the minimum speed. Of course people will drive faster. Ever been to a state with higher speed limits than Illinois? People in state’s I’ve visited tend to drive faster than their posted speed limits. Also, is Oberweis OK with cutting other budgets to beef up ISP speed enforcement? Where and how?
Also, the SJ-R editorial cited as an authority the National Motorists Association, which is offering a $20,000 cash reward to anyone who can substantiate the stats in this National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statement…
Despite the tireless efforts of thousands of advocates, impaired drivers continue to kill someone every 30 minutes, nearly 50 people a day, and almost 18,000 citizens a year. NHTSA and its partners are working together to put a stop to these deadly statistics.
43 Comments
|
Protect Jobs for Illinois Veterans: Pass SB 1665/HB 2414
Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
In April 2012, Peoples Gas established the Utility Workers Training Program (UWTP) for military veterans—a $3.5 million multi-partner and union-backed training-to-placement program for those who have honorably served our country. To date, 60 veterans have completed the program and 42 have started a career as a gas utility worker at Peoples Gas.
Through this program, veterans develop the skills they need to enter Illinois’ natural gas industry. The curriculum of core classes has enabled each student to earn 52 college credits toward an AA degree. The new employees have also earned their Gas Utility Worker Advanced Certification at Dawson Technical Institute, a satellite site of Kennedy-King College, one of the City Colleges of Chicago.
The UWTP was created to support Peoples Gas’ Accelerated Main Replacement Program (AMRP) to replace 2,000 miles of cast and ductile iron mains in its distribution system. This project has already created over 1,000 jobs, including UWTP graduates.
The Natural Gas Modernization, Public Safety and Jobs Bill (SB 1665/HB 2414), is needed to allow natural gas utilities to confidently invest and continue hiring in Illinois. If it is not passed, Peoples Gas will be forced to slow or halt its pipeline modernization project, which would threaten the jobs that are putting Illinois veterans to work.
Members of the General Assembly: vote YES on SB 1665/HB 2414.
Comments Off
|
Show me the money
Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* There appears to be a real need for this program…
State lawmakers are considering legislation that encourages witnesses to cooperate more with police. The bill that already passed the House would provide more funding to protect, and in some cases, relocate witnesses of gang-related crimes. […]
Law enforcement officials say their investigations are often hampered by witnesses who are reluctant to testify. Yet some programs designed to coax them into working with prosecutors can barely keep up with demand.
“I could double the staff and keep everybody busy all the time,” said Lori Smith, head of Cook County’s victim witness assistance unit. “Every year funding shrinks and we are always subject to what’s going to happen with the county budget.”
Smith said last year the unit had 52 employees handling about 13,000 cases. […]
A similar witness protection program was launched in 1996 and administered by the Illinois State Police. The state appropriated $666,000 for the Gang Crime Witness Protection pilot program, but two years later the program was eliminated due to lack of funding.
No doubt, this is a good idea.
But the actual bill doesn’t “provide more funding.” It merely creates a new fund and specifies how the cash will be distributed, if there ever is any cash.
Unless and until there’s an official appropriation, or unless the controlling agency somehow finds some grant money, this bill means nothing. It’s just a well intentioned feel-good measure, which is why it passed unanimously.
7 Comments
|
Raoul points to Indiana law
Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Very interesting…
A copy of Sen. Kwame Raoul’s proposed [conceald carry] legislation that was obtained by The Associated Press indicates the plan would require an applicant to not only be free of a criminal record and pass a background check, but provide a “proper reason” for wanting to carry a gun and be “of good moral character.”
Those are hallmarks of laws in states such as New York, where police have wide latitude to deny applications. But Raoul said it was lifted from neighboring Indiana, whose concealed carry law dates back decades.
Raoul said a staff member told him that verbiage came from neighboring Indiana, which has been considered a conservative “shall issue” state for at least 25 years.
“I’ve never heard anybody characterize the state of Indiana as having a super-liberal approach to guns,” Raoul said.
“Proper reason” is stated plainly in the Hoosier state’s law: It is “for the defense of oneself or the state of Indiana.”
* From the Indiana statute…
(d) The superintendent may make whatever further investigation the superintendent deems necessary. Whenever disapproval is recommended, the officer to whom the application is made shall provide the superintendent and the applicant with the officer’s complete and specific reasons, in writing, for the recommendation of disapproval.
(e) If it appears to the superintendent that the applicant:
(1) has a proper reason for carrying a handgun;
(2) is of good character and reputation;
(3) is a proper person to be licensed; and
(4) is:
(A) a citizen of the United States; or
(B) not a citizen of the United States but is allowed to carry a firearm in the United States under federal law;
the superintendent shall issue to the applicant a qualified or an unlimited license to carry any handgun lawfully possessed by the applicant.
So, Indiana also has a “good character” test.
* “Proper reason” defined…
Sec. 8. “Proper reason” means for the defense of oneself or the state of Indiana.
* “Proper person” defined…
“Proper person” means a person who:
(1) does not have a conviction for resisting law enforcement under IC 35-44-3-3 within five (5) years before the person applies for a license or permit under this chapter;
(2) does not have a conviction for a crime for which the person could have been sentenced for more than one (1) year;
(3) does not have a conviction for a crime of domestic violence (as defined in IC 35-41-1-6.3), unless a court has restored the person’s right to possess a firearm under IC 35-47-4-7;
(4) is not prohibited by a court order from possessing a handgun;
(5) does not have a record of being an alcohol or drug abuser as defined in this chapter;
(6) does not have documented evidence which would give rise to a reasonable belief that the person has a propensity for violent or emotionally unstable conduct;
(7) does not make a false statement of material fact on the person’s application;
(8) does not have a conviction for any crime involving an inability to safely handle a handgun;
(9) does not have a conviction for violation of the provisions of this article within five (5) years of the person’s application; or
(10) does not have an adjudication as a delinquent child for an act that would be a felony if committed by an adult, if the person applying for a license or permit under this chapter is less than twenty-three (23) years of age.
Discuss.
* Related…
* Raoul seeks ‘middle ground’ with new concealed-carry plans
* Allow concealed carry except in Cook County?
* Senate gun-carry bill to get overhaul
* Lisa Madigan asks U.S. Supreme Court for extension on concealed carry
* Dozens Pack Illinois Concealed Carry Classes
72 Comments
|
A tale of three headlines
Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The heds…
* Tribune: ComEd rate hike request would add $6 to monthly bills
* Crain’s: ComEd wants $311 million rate hike in 2014
* Sun-Times: ComEd wants rate hike but says bills will be lower
* The Tribune explains the reasons behind the higher rate…
Commonwealth Edison said Monday that it will charge $6 more per month on average to deliver electricity to utility customers beginning in 2014 as a result of higher transmission costs and expenses it has incurred to modernize the electrical grid.
In a filing with the Illinois Commerce Commission Monday — its third under a new formula-based rate making system devised in 2011 — the utility requested $311 million in additional revenue from customers in 2014 for its role in delivering electricity, maintaining electrical lines and improving the electrical grid. That increase would amount to about $5 per month for the average electricity customer and must be approved by the Illinois Commerce Commission.
* Crain’s breaks down its $311 million number and provides some context…
ComEd filed for a $311 million increase in the revenue it receives from ratepayers, a figure that ComEd executives said will be more like $335 million once recently passed legislation by the General Assembly to increase the utility’s revenue becomes law.
Under the controversial 2011 “smart grid” law, enacted over Gov. Pat Quinn’s veto, ComEd is permitted to increase delivery rates annually over a decade to finance a $2.6 billion grid modernization program that includes the installation of “smart meters” in every home and business in northern Illinois.
After the ICC reduced ComEd’s rate hike last year, the utility delayed the planned installation of the meters for what it said were lack of funds. Executives said today that, if the bill just passed becomes law by June 15, the company will begin installing meters in the fourth quarter of this year and aims to install 60,000 in 2013.
Mr. Quinn is expected to veto that bill, but there are sufficient margins in both the state House and Senate to override a veto.
* And the Sun-Times explains its headline…
Despite the request, the average electric bill for a residential customer will fall from about $81 monthly to about $66, beginning in June — thanks to falling energy prices.
If the higher delivery rate is approved, bills will rise in January to an average of about $72 monthly — still about 10 percent below the current rate.
Bills will fall even with the higher delivery charges because power suppliers are producing energy more cheaply, ComEd officials said.
8 Comments
|
NRCC tries another reboot
Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From USA Today…
House Republicans are targeting popular “mommy blog” websites in a digital ad campaign beginning Tuesday as part of an ongoing effort to repair the GOP’s image with certain voting blocs — in this case swing female voters — who have sided decisively with Democrats in recent elections.
The banner ads will be featured on over 100 websites popular among women and geo-targeted to be viewed by residents in 20 Democratic-held congressional districts targeted by the GOP for 2014. The House Republican campaign operation is increasing its use of niche digital ad marketing for the upcoming election cycle. They used a similar strategy targeting Democrats on the unpopular automatic spending cuts known as sequester in March.
The $20,000 ad buy, running on sites including Ikeafans.com and MarthaStewart.com through Friday, will call on Democrats to vote with House Republicans next week on a bill to give hourly private sector workers more flexibility to choose between compensatory time and cash payment for overtime work. […]
The legislative effort is not expected to garner much Democratic support because it has long been opposed by labor unions and Democratic interests who argue it is a backdoor attempt to weaken workers’ rights to overtime pay.
* The NRCC sent along a sample ad…
The ads link to an online petition.
* NRCC statement…
“It’s a shame that Bill Enyart is willing to play politics while working moms and their kids need a voice to fight for them in Congress. It’s time for Enyart to stop forcing women to choose between work and family and start protecting the needs of all Illinois families.” – NRCC Spokeswoman Katie Prill
Think it’ll make any difference?
* But this may be a more important issue for Enyart…
The federal government won’t make a decision for years on whether to close Scott Air Force Base, but leaders in southwestern Illinois fear growing budget pressures in Washington could affect the facility’s future.
Illinois’ congressional delegation has vowed to work to keep the base open, even though the next round of closures won’t begin taking place until at least 2015.
U.S. Department of Defense officials have said the military has more infrastructure than needed, and Illinois lawmakers fear the base will stay on the chopping block as the costs of Medicare and other government-funded social programs continue to soar, forcing spending reductions in other areas of the federal budget.
“If we don’t reform our entitlement programs, discretionary dollars will continue to get cut, which puts Scott more at risk,'’ Republican U.S. Rep. John Shimkus told the newspaper.
* More…
U.S. Rep. Bill Enyart, D-Belleville, who replaced Costello in January, is seen as a strong voice for Scott. A former commander of the Illinois National Guard, Enyart serves on the House Armed Services Committee.
Enyart spoke optimistically of community-wide efforts to protect Scott. It’s a campaign bolstered by the fact the Air Force’s Air Mobility Command cited the St. Louis region’s strong support for military personnel at Scott Air Force Base as the reason for awarding the region the prestigious Abilene Trophy. The trophy is to be awarded officially in June.
“The folks are pulling together because they know how important it is,” Enyart said. “We’re going to be working very diligently to make sure that Scott isn’t impacted by BRAC … This is not a partisan issue. This is our region, our economy, and we’re all working together.”
21 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
Bill would remove limit on abuse suits
Monday, Apr 29, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From the Senate Democrats…
Victims of childhood sexual abuse would no longer face legal deadlines regarding how long they have to seek damages from their abusers, under legislation state Sen. Terry Link passed out of the Illinois Senate this week.
“I don’t know how you put an expiration date on being scarred for life,” Link said after his legislation, Senate Bill 1399, was approved 48-4. It now advances to the Illinois House for further consideration.
Current state law imposes a 20-year deadline for a sexual abuse victim to file a lawsuit against the abuser. More specifically, the victim has 20 years from the date that he or she knew of the abuse to go to court.
Link’s plan simply eliminates that deadline so a victim could sue for damages at any time.
The bill is here.
Your thoughts?
25 Comments
|
Madigan asks for extension on gun case
Monday, Apr 29, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Attorney General Lisa Madigan has asked the US Supreme Court to grant an extension in the concealed carry case. Read the filing by clicking here.
Madigan has to file her petition for certiorary by May 23rd, while the spring session is still in session and several days before the June 9th appellate court deadline is imposed on the state. She’s asking for a 30-day delay.
Gov. Pat Quinn is listed on the request as a petitioner. Quinn has publicly urged Madigan to file an appeal.
From the AG’s office…
The June 9 deadline still stands for the legislature to act. This filing doesn’t impact that.
What this filing does is allow us more time to prepare a petition, and to the extent the legislature takes action before June 9, it allows us to take that action into consideration as we draft a petition for review as the Attorney General continues to assess the appropriate next steps.
31 Comments
|
Justice Harrison
Monday, Apr 29, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Former Illinois Supreme Court Justice Moses Harrison passed away last week. This is his career defining quote…
“People often ask how I see my role as a judge. It is to protect ordinary citizens against wrongdoing by the government, large corporations and powerful individuals.”
* Here’s another one…
In a 2002 Supreme Court news release announcing his retirement, Harrison said his small-town upbringing in Collinsville instilled within him a philosophy that “the reason for our existence is to help other people.”
* And he championed the end of the death penalty…
One of the more well-known dissents Harrison delivered came in November 1998, when he wrote that the state’s death penalty was unconstitutional because “the execution of an innocent person is inevitable.”
About three months later, according to the court’s 2002 release, Death Row inmate Anthony Porter was exonerated and released after someone else admitted to the murders that put him behind bars.
“There are some who say Chief Justice Harrison was the first to call for a stop to executions in Illinois,” the court’s 2002 release states.
Not even a year after Harrison issued a public statement in 1999 that said the governor had the constitutional power to stop executions, the release notes that former Gov. Ryan issued a moratorium on the state’s death penalty.
* Where to give…
Memorials may be made to St. Michael’s Episcopal Church, 111 O’Fallon Troy Road, O’Fallon, IL, 62269, or the Justinian Society of Lawyers Scholarship Fund, 734 N. Wells St., Chicago, IL, 60610.
7 Comments
|
* Democrat David Gill on his loss to Republican Rodney Davis last November…
“When you look precinct by precinct, you see the impact that John Hartman had,” Gill told me last week. “I would have won by at least a point and a half had there not been a John Hartman.”
Yeah, and if Davis wasn’t on the ballot, Gill would’ve won by a landslide.
Whatever.
He was a weak candidate. End of story. If Gill runs again and wins the primary, he’ll be a weak candidate again.
* As I told subscribers last week, the DCCC is pinning its hopes on the chief judge of the 3rd Judicial Circuit Ann Callis…
Callis was in a similar situation before. Two years ago Democrats tried to talk her into running in the 12th Congressional District, for the seat that had been held by former U.S. Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Belleville. She took a pass that time — “I came to the conclusion that at this time, I could not leave a community that I love, employees and colleagues of Madison County Circuit Court that have become like family to me,” she said — and the seat eventually went to Rep. William Enyart, another Democrat.
But Democrats now want her to run in Davis’ 13th Congressional District, even though her home outside of Troy is in the 15th District represented by Rep. John Shimkus, R-Collinsville. […]
As the chief judge in the 3rd Judicial Circuit, she has name recognition in several counties in the southern end of the district, she has contacts and money (she self-funded her campaign for judicial retention last year and her father, Lance Callis, is a Granite City trial lawyer who made millions by investing in the Argosy Casino in Alton, then selling his shares in 2005) and she has a good reputation.
Callis can self-fund, which is a big plus for the DC folks. Expect an announcement soon.
22 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, Apr 29, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* From WUIS…
The governor’s latest tax returns also show he gave $7500 to charity.
That’s about $4000 less than he gave in 2011.
* The Question(s): Which charities do you usually contribute to, and what percentage of your income goes to charity?
41 Comments
|
* Former state Senator Rev. James Meeks appears in a new robocall aimed at African-American voters. Meeks encourages people to call their Illinois House members and demand they vote against the gay marriage bill. Listen…
* Sun-Times…
“The [African-American Clergy Coalition] has begun distributing fliers to Cook County African American Churches,” a release from the AACC said today. “African American Clergymen have now taken the AACC flier and began instructing their Congregations to call their legislators.”
The fliers contain a list of African American House members with their phone numbers.
Direct lobbying by pastors in their churches seems pretty darned close to the line. Click the fliers for a larger view…
* In other news, Carol Marin writes about House Republican Leader Tom Cross’ stance on gay marriage…
Inside Cross’ caucus of 47 Republicans, David Harris and most others will vote “no” when the time comes. Only two Republicans, Ron Sandack of Downers Grove and Ed Sullivan of Mundelein, have publicly voiced support for same-sex marriage. And they’re reportedly taking a huge amount of heat from some GOP brethren because of it.
Enter Cross.
“I’m trying to balance . . . and respect the wishes of a whole caucus . . . at the same time trying to remind everybody in our caucus that there are folks who are for this. You have to respect them,” he said by phone on Friday.
The ironies abound.
Some of the downstate members of Cross’ caucus who invoke their conservatism in opposing gay marriage don’t seem very conservative at all when it comes to pension reform. On that issue, they seem to have found common ground with their liberal Democratic colleagues, dependent as many of them are on the support of public employee unions.
* Related…
* New conservative lobbying push for gay marriage: The group has spent $500,000 on lobbying since last month, including efforts in Rhode Island, Delaware, Indiana, West Virginia and Utah.
* Rhode Island Beats Illinois To Gay Marriage: The risk of a black lawmakers losing his seat seems minimal, though. They can’t lose their seats to Republicans, and in 2014, is any Democrat going to run a primary campaign on the issue of opposing same-sex marriage? The winner wouldn’t have a lot of friends in the House Democratic Caucus. More likely, a black legislator trying to move up to alderman, county board, state senate or Congress would be denied a Sunday appearance at a conservative black church. That’s a valuable endorsement in the black community, so that may be enough to make a politician hesitate before pressing “yes.”
54 Comments
|
Credit Union (noun) – an essential financial cooperative
Monday, Apr 29, 2013 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Cooperatives can be formed to support producers such as farmers, purchasers such as independent business owners, and consumers such as electric coops and credit unions. Their primary purpose is to meet members’ needs through affordable goods and services of high quality. Cooperatives such as credit unions may look like other businesses in their operations and, like other businesses, can range in size. However, the cooperative structure is distinctively different regardless of size. As not-for-profit financial cooperatives, credit unions serve individuals with a common goal or interest. They are owned and democratically controlled by the people who use their services. Their board of directors consists of unpaid volunteers, elected by and from the membership. Members are owners who pool funds to help other members. After expenses and reserve requirements are met, net revenue is returned to members via lower loan and higher savings rates, lower costs and fees for services. It is the structure of credit unions, not their size or range of services that is the reason for their tax exempt status - and the reason why almost three million Illinois residents are among 95 million Americans who count on their local credit union everyday to reach their financial goals.
Comments Off
|
A very long to-do list
Monday, Apr 29, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* As Doug Finke points out, there’s an awful lot to do in the next five weeks…
The deadline has now passed for the House and Senate to act on bills that started in their respective chambers, marking the halfway point in the process. Let’s see where some big things stand.
The state budget? It’s not May yet, so of course it’s nowhere to be seen. Outside, that is, of Gov. PAT QUINN’s budget that was outlined in March and hasn’t been heard of since. Even Quinn’s budget probably wouldn’t be out there if the state Constitution didn’t force him to do it. Bzzzt. (Cue the penalty buzzer).
Gambling expansion with its lure of easy new millions for the state? Hasn’t’ passed either chamber. Bzzzt.
Concealed carry seems headed toward the state in one form or another after a court-ordered deadline of June 9. Surely the legislature has acted to put its stamp on that, right? Nope. The House has debated and voted on two concealed-carry bills — one restrictive, one not — and rejected both of them (guess they get points for consistency). That still puts the House ahead of the Senate, which has yet to publicly debate and vote on any concealed-carry bill. Bzzzt.
Compared to all of that, there’s been an explosion of activity on pension reform. The Senate actually passed a reform bill (on the second try) dealing with one of the five systems. The House has passed three reform bills over to the Senate.
Unfortunately, none of that stuff is the final version of pension reform. Plus, it all passed before the spring break that ended April 5. Since then, nothing
* Add Rep. Adam Brown’s bill to the list…
Brown, in his second term in the House, is sponsor of HB 2496, a bill to provide state incentives to help lure a $1.2 billion fertilizer plant to Tuscola, a project that would be an economic boon to East Central Illinois. Iowa also is competing for the plant.
Brown had lined up two dozen co-sponsors for the measure, met with House leaders, the governor and others, got the bill out of committee unanimously and thought it was in good shape for passage.
“It was getting extremely close to being called. We had a meeting with Speaker (Michael) Madigan, (Democratic Leader) Barbara Flynn Currie and (Republican Leader Tom) Cross where we sat down and discussed all the issues at hand. They indicated they were supportive,” Brown recalled.
“And then a couple days later, John Bradley filed Amendment 3.”
Amendment 3 forgives a $15 million state loan to the Chicago Port Authority that was made 25 years ago.
The odd thing is that Rep. John Bradley is from Marion, about 310 miles from the offices of the Chicago Port Authority. But Bradley is also among Madigan’s assistant leaders.
The amendment was approved in a voice vote on the House floor, so now it’s part of Brown’s bill for the Tuscola fertilizer plant, a bill that was seemingly headed for approval. Now his bill is on hold.
“I tried to remove it,” Brown said. “But it turned out that wouldn’t work out.”
A pattern is developing in the House of holding off on all the goodies until the hard stuff is passed. Brown is a conservative, but he’s against pension reform. He’s also a likely “No” vote on the budget. The thinking may be to not give him what he wants for his district until after the hard stuff has passed.
But that means a ton of legislation (far more than listed above) is backlogged. It’s gonna be a crazy May. Either that, or nothing will get done.
* Related…
* Editorial: Don’t give state more money to throw away
* Vendors step up to pay Illinois’ bills
* Editorial: Illinois road paved with patronage
* Economic development, Texas-style: What Illinois can learn
* Bost: Link Card abuse out of control
28 Comments
|
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
A new statewide poll shows a majority of Illinoisans favor concealed carry. But an overwhelming majority in every area of the state also say it’s OK with them if Chicago and Cook County police have additional authority over who gets to carry in their own jurisdictions.
The Capitol Fax/We Ask America poll of 1,284 likely voters found that 52 percent say they approve of allowing concealed carry.
“Illinois lawmakers are debating proposed laws that would allow some citizens who are properly licensed to carry concealed firearms,” respondents were told. “In general, do you approve or disapprove of allowing licensed citizens to carry loaded, concealed firearms?”
The poll, taken April 24th, found that 46 percent disapprove and just 2 percent were neutral or had no opinion. The poll had a margin of error of +/-2.7 percent. 26 percent of the numbers called were cell phones.
Geography breaks down pretty much how you’d expect. Chicagoans staunchly opposed concealed carry 69-29, while suburban Cook County voters opposed it 52-46. Downstaters strongly support the proposal 67-32 and collar county voters support it 53-46.
Women disapproved of the idea 55-43, while men supported it 64-34. Republicans backed it 72-26, Democrats opposed it 65-34 and independents favored it 61-36. African-Americans opposed the idea 61-36, but whites backed it 56-43, as did Latinos, 56-43.
The results for the poll’s second question were even more interesting.
The Senate is currently considering a plan that would allow Chicago police and the Cook County Sheriff to reject State Police-issued concealed carry permits if they have questions about the applicants’ character. The plan stalled last week when Republican Senators balked after strong National Rifle Association opposition and Chicago-area Democrats demanded more restrictions in the rest of the bill.
But the voting public absolutely loves this idea, with a whopping 73 percent voicing their approval. “I can’t get 73 percent of people to agree that it’s dark at midnight,” joked We Ask America pollster Gregg Durham last week.
“If a concealed carry law is passed, Chicago and Cook County law enforcement officials want the right to stop a permit being issued to any individual in Chicago or Cook County when there is a concern about the applicant’s character,” respondents were told. “Do you think they should be able to stop a permit in Chicago or Cook County under those circumstances?”
A mere 22 percent disagreed with the proposal and only 5 percent were neutral or had no opinion.
The results didn’t surprise Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), who is attempting to craft a compromise bill. Raoul said he believed that Downstaters don’t care what happens in Chicago or anywhere else as long as they get their right to carry. And Chicagoans are so concerned about guns that they want their local cops to have an extra say.
According to the poll, a hugely strong 71 percent of likely Downstate voters said they approved of the plan, while 25 percent were opposed. The NRA has threatened legislators with retaliation if Chicagoans don’t end up with the same access to concealed carry as everyone else, but that particular message may not fly as long as Downstaters get what they want for themselves.
Even so, Downstaters seem to be sticking with the NRA. “I am working to pass a Concealed Carry law that specifically says it SHALL apply to all counties in Illinois,” state Sen. Kyle McCarter (R-Lebanon) wrote on his website last week. “The Second Amendment of the Constitution applies [to] all citizens, including those in Chicago.”
But a sky-high 80 percent of likely Chicago voters approved of the proposal, as did 72 percent of suburban Cook voters and 71 percent of collar county voters.
Support was also very high across all demographics. Women were 80-14 in favor, and men were 62-32 in favor. Black voters backed it 75-16, whites supported it 65-34 and Latinos approved of it 75-18. Republicans supported it 64-30, Democrats favored it 82-13 and independents backed it 67-23.
Results like that could make you think this ought to be a no-brainer issue. But the NRA is bringing all of its considerable might to the table here, and that muscle is, so far, outweighing overwhelming public opinion.
Subscribers have crosstabs.
* Related…
* Quinn: Cities, not state, should approve concealed guns: Sen. Tim Bivins of Dixon, the Republican negotiator on the issue, supported Raoul’s idea of a “compromise” giving Chicago more authority if carry permits were more readily available to lawful gun owners in the rest of the state. But he was much more cautious late last week after seeing the proposed language. A more widespread local option is out of the question, the former Lee County sheriff said.
91 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|