SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Fun with numbers

Thursday, Mar 6, 2014

* From a Daily Herald story originally entitled “Suburbs would pay more under graduated income tax”

A growing campaign for a graduated income tax in Illinois could push more of the total tax burden onto some areas of the suburbs, where median incomes far outpace state averages, critics say. […]

The suburbs’ higher incomes suggest a graduated tax, whatever it eventually looked like, could be a battleground issue locally. […]

The median annual household income in most suburban counties is higher than the Illinois average of $56,853, census data from 2008 to 2012 shows.

The median household income is $78,538 in DuPage County, $68,674 in Kane County, $83,835 in Kendall County, $79,085 in Lake County, $77,325 in McHenry County and $76,352 in Will County.

In Cook County including Chicago, the median household income is $54,648. However, it’s higher in most suburban Cook County towns, like a median of $71,306 in Streamwood and $81,105 in Hoffman Estates, for example.

* OK, the first thing you really need to understand about a graduated tax is that once you reach a higher tax threshold your increased tax rate does not apply to your full income. It applies only to the income above your new rate level. So, for instance, here are rates that Rep. Naomi Jakobsson has suggested, via the Illinois Policy Institute

A person making $60K under Jakobsson’s plan would not be paying 6 percent on that entire 60 grand. That person would be paying six percent only on $2,000, and etc. down the line.

* The folks at A Better Illinois, which is advocating for a graduated Illinois tax and is backed by organized labor, among others, put together actual tax rates for all those suburban counties in the Daily Herald article and compared them to today’s current income tax rate. I’ve adjusted the headings a bit to make it more clear that these are Jakobsson’s proposed rates.

Again, this chart compares the current income tax rate of 5 percent to what the actual rate would be for median income in the suburbs if Rep. Jakobsson’s rates were enacted…

You can check their math by clicking here.

* So, under this particular proposal, people earning around the median income would be paying less than they are now, not more.

Then again, if the income tax is allowed to expire on schedule and the graduated tax was implemented down the road, there would most definitely be a tax hike for median earners, but not as high as they’re paying today.

* It should also be noted that the group doesn’t actually support Rep. Jakobsson’s tax rate plan, calling it “less progressive than what’s most likely to be attached to a Fair Tax.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - wordslinger - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:12 pm:

    –OK, the first thing you really need to understand about a graduated tax is that once you reach a higher tax threshold your increased tax rate does not apply to your full income–

    Kind of a major point, if you’re going to write a news story about it.

  2. - Bars - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:18 pm:

    Current law is a 3.75 percent income tax in 2015, which is when a progressive tax would go into effect. That is the fair apples to apples comparison. Her plan has the makings of a major tax hike for those communities. They will get slammed regardless because they are “rich” compared to everyone else.

  3. - Nieva - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:18 pm:

    If this passes the first thing I would expect to see is an attempt at taking away retirees state tax exemption and reducing our pensions by another 5 to 7 percent.

  4. - JSlim - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:18 pm:

    So, what rates does the group propose/ support? Jakobsson is the sponsor, so her plan seems pretty relevant. I don’t see how they can ask people to support this if they are asking folks to just trust legislators to do right by the taxpayers.

  5. - arsonpi - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:27 pm:

    just one more reason to pack up and leave this state

  6. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:29 pm:

    @Bars - that is an excellent point, one I had not considered.

  7. - truthteller - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:36 pm:

    Several points:1) Doesn’t the Herald know that suburbs don’t pay income taxes, suburbanites do. Under a graduated plan, a Chicagoan making $1 million would pay a higher rate than a Du Page resident making $70, 000. Suburbs doesn’t pay more, wealthier people pay more.
    2) Illinois voters adopted a constitution that stipulates you must have a flat tax. The voters who approved it had no guarantee what that rate would be. Why would you want to lock a graduated rate into the constitution? It may well need to be adjusted over time, but it would still have to be enacted into law by a legislature and signed by a governor.

    3) A graduated tax is not such a novel idea. Almost all states have one as does the federal government. If Washington decided to move to a flat tax while generating the same money it now does, the wealthy would pay less and the less wealthy would pay more.That’s upside down

  8. - Jeff Trigg - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    What good does it do to poor people making less than $18,000 to take 3% of their income? That rate should be zero if we truly care about helping the poor.

  9. - Mom - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:37 pm:

    A Better Illinois’ math is faulty at worse, incomplete at best, because they ignore the personal exemption. As for a “doomsday” scenario — multiply the rates by 2 and you’re probably closer to reality. Remember when Quinn’s “no more than” 33% magically became 67% w/ the 2011 rate hike?

  10. - Blah - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:43 pm:

    Actually, considering all the deductions and exemptions, none of this mathematics is relevant either.

  11. - Under Further Review - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:52 pm:

    Because Illinois has fiscal problems because the state and local governments do not have a spending problem but too little to spend?

  12. - Siriusly - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:53 pm:

    Thanks for the info, but this is backwards thinking. How much revenue would this generate? And what is the revenue goal for any new income tax schedule? Let’s agree on the goal before we start fighting about how to get there.

    We should be backing into a goal for a revenue number, not taxing way way more first and then spending later.

    In principle, I think a progressive income tax rate does have merit - but the numbers you put up here as Jakobsson’s seem much too high to me. But it’s hard to really know if we can’t see the revenue projections at the same time.

  13. - Walker - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 1:55 pm:

    Thought it was the stupidest headline in the DH in a long time. It doesn’t charge suburbs more, it charges the wealthiest people more, and really isn’t targeted at suburbs per se.

    I guess you can find victimhood any where, if you’re really desperate for it.

    And most residents of each of those suburbs would probably pay less than today, depending on income distribution within them.

  14. - AnonymousOne - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:00 pm:

    Pack up and leave this state? The choices of where to go will be slim. Most states have a graduated income tax structure. A few states have no income tax but we’re talking few. Some in this state act like this is Armageddon. Funny how other states have a graduated tax but do NOT have our financial problems. Do you think there’s a correlation? If people want services they have to pay for them. You can’t keep ripping off the pension funds anymore. Find the money legitimately.

  15. - ZC - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:10 pm:

    Following up on What Walker Said: Median income doesn’t tell you much where the Pritzkers and Sam Zells live in IL. That 9% “above 500K” is going to pull in a lot of the actual cash, in a state where income is distributed as unevenly as it is here.

    So my hunch is that Lake County would emerge as a much bigger net payer, even though its -median- income is below Kendall’s, because the really big houses are in Lake (not to mention the overall population differences). And as noted, suburban Cook (they’ll love this proposal in Kenilworth).

    But Chicago’s .01 percent would be chipping in a good deal too. If you’re not looking at where the 1% and .01 percent are distributed, this county-by-county median income analysis is only going to give you a sketch.

  16. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:11 pm:

    ===because they ignore the personal exemption===

    Which is paltry to begin with and would likely apply in both cases.

  17. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:13 pm:

    ===Lake County would emerge as a much bigger net payer===

    Most probably so, but people pay taxes, not counties.

  18. - Dr Voodoo - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:24 pm:

    For those wondering, the break-even point (ignoring exemptions) between the 5% flat tax and the Jakobsson proposal would be $103,500.

    To Bars point, at a 3.75% flat tax, the break-even income would be $43,200. Pretty significant difference when discussing whether this is a tax break for average households.

  19. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:29 pm:

    @Bars - I just ran the numbers.

    This particular proposal would raise taxes on any tax return reporting over $43,200 in AGI.

    At $43,200, you would pay $1,620 in taxes whether the rate was 3.75% as determined by current law or higher as under Jakobsson’s proposal.

    The maximum “tax break” you could possibly receive under this proposal would be for those making exactly $18,000. Their “tax break” would save them $135.

    Tax filers reporting $36,000 would save $90 under this proposal.

    Tax filers reporting over $43,200 would, obviously, save nothing and in fact pay more under this proposal.

  20. - one of the 35 - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:40 pm:

    So, let’s just pretend the original legislative promise to make the 67% state income tax increase temporary, was never made. Now let’s change the question to whether or not we will move to a graduated income tax. We voters are so stupid we will never catch on to this ploy!

  21. - PoolGuy - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:44 pm:

    isn’t this the real reason Rauner wants to be Gov? to stop this from happening? so he and his billionaire contributors don’t get a graduated tax. forget the 67% hike, this would be a 300% hike on the 3% they paid four or five years ago.

  22. - wordslinger - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:45 pm:

    One, what’s the ploy?

    Most of the income tax increase will sunset without another positive vote in the GA and signature of the governor.

    A graduated income tax will require a constitutional amendment.

  23. - jake - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:58 pm:

    ==How much revenue would this generate?==
    The revenue projected from the Jakobsson schedule would be approximately 5% more than the current 5% flat tax. So it is almost revenue-neutral, based on that benchmark.

  24. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 2:59 pm:

    @wordslinger - it appears @one of the 35 was referencing the claims made by A Better Illinois and certain legislators.

    A good example of this would be the chart above, which claims the graduated income tax proposal would provide filers in Kendall County making $83,835 with a “tax break” of $282.

    In fact, those filers would be facing a tax INCREASE of $766.29.

  25. - Ahoy! - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 3:02 pm:

    Well, flat rate or progressive rate under someone making more income will pay more in State income taxes.

    I did a little math on what it would cost someone making $500,000. I hope this impacts me someday, but it does not at all.

    In general, if I made $500,000 under the current law in 2015 I would pay $18,750 in taxes ($500,000 X .0375). Under the progressive income tax I would pay $47,922 (using the income range per tax rate as Rich mentioned above.

    In 2015 I would be paying $29,172 more in taxes.

    Over a 10 year period assuming my income stayed at $500,000, I would pay $291,720.

    This sounds like a great revenue opportunity for the State. Of course, if that’s me, I’m probably moving to Tennessee, or some other state where there is no income tax and the State looses my tax revenue.

    Maybe tax reform (expanding taxes to services) and spending reform would be a better solution. Maybe in the short term we should look at sun setting the income tax at a slower rate, maybe 1/4% a year until we’re at 3.75% to deal with our obligations and look toward policies that will create more jobs and revenue that comes with those jobs.

  26. - What is to bo done? - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 3:06 pm:

    You can bet when things go bad that they will try to tax the money from Pensions and retirement accounts….a drowning rat has no morales

  27. - Ahoy! - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 3:08 pm:

    I just did the calculation for my family which we are are below the Illinois Medium income and I would pay $800 more a year under the progressive income tax plan that I would under current law of 3.75% in 2015.

  28. - Southwest Cook - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 3:10 pm:

    Here are the effective tax rates for various incomes under this proposal:

    $18,000 3.00%
    $24,000 3.25%
    $36,000 3.50%
    $43,200 3.75%
    $54,000 4.00%
    $64,000 4.25%
    $74,667 4.50%
    $89,600 4.75%
    $103,500 5.00%
    $118,286 5.25%
    $138,000 5.50%
    $165,600 5.75%
    $201,500 6.00%
    $268,667 6.50%
    $403,000 7.00%
    $602,000 7.50%
    $903,000 8.00%
    $1,806,000 8.50%

  29. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 3:12 pm:

    @jake - do you know where we can find those numbers to better educate ourselves?

    Because according to an article quoted in an earlier CapFax post,

    Sen. Jakobsson says that

    === Her tax schedule also would yield about 15 percent more revenue for the state ===

    as compared to the existing 5% tax rate.

    And I don’t see a revenue analysis prepared by the state for the legislation on the ILGA website.

  30. - Mittuns - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 3:33 pm:

    Also worth noting that the effective tax rates will differ if, say, there’s a two person household or a single earner household. On the median of $56,000, A couple making $25k and $31k will pay almost $1k less in taxes than the single earner making $56k.

  31. - Anonymous - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:14 pm:

    Looking only at personal income tax results in a misrepresentation of the true effect of a graduated tax. The lower and middle income groups have a much higher effective overall tax rate to start with once all other taxes and fees are included, like sales tax, gasoline tax, property tax, etc.

    I recall CTBA doing such an analysis. Where are they in the debate?

  32. - Original Rambler - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:29 pm:

    I would gladly agree to a graduated income tax plan like this rather than another increase in cigarette tax and/or gambling expansion which are, in effect, a tax increase that disproportionately impacts low income taxpayers. (And I do neither!)

    Ahoy, do you think there will be a $500,000/year job waiting for you in Chattanooga!?

  33. - jim - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:33 pm:

    Has anyone stopped to consider that Rep. Jakobsson won’t be in the legislature to promote her tax plan, assuming the General Assembly puts it on the ballot and voters approve it. Talking about these various plans as if they really mean something is pointless because the numbers won’t be determined for a year, if at all.
    By the way, is it unfair to point out that Jakobsson and her professor husband won’t be paying income taxes on their retirement income because it’s exempt from state taxation.

  34. - RNUG - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:34 pm:

    - Anonymous - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:14 pm:

    From their studies, I would say CTBA is in favor of a graduated tax.

  35. - Arizona Bob - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:36 pm:

    =I recall CTBA doing such an analysis. Where are they in the debate?=

    Where they always are. No tax increase is excessive enough, and no burden is too much to bear for non-union taxpayers.

    Oh, and don’t forget that six figure pensions at age 55 and salaries given out to gym teachers in Illinois for nine months work are never a problem with CTBA and Martire.

    Good policy spending is never on Martire’s agenda, only soaking the taxpayers for all he can get is.

    Their tax policy is simple.Charge no or low income taxes on 60% of the voters so that they don’t care if you raise taxes to outragous levels on the remaining 40%. That’s been the Ilinois Dems strategy, as well as Detroit’s, for several decades now.

    Sadly, it keeps them in power.

  36. - Federalist - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:48 pm:

    Over a period of timemore and more higher income individuals will leave the state. It will not be instantaneous but it will happen.

    And what about a graduated income tax for businesses? Will that be next?

    There is no end to this and the money will be spent with little accountability just like it is now. The state has a $35 billion GRF and another $25 billion fromnthe FEds. But it is never enough.

    Of course, pensions will be blamed for the state’s problems. That is what politicians too often do, blame the victim and use them as the scapegoat if they can drum up that support.

    Would it pass? I doubt it. Takes 60% to pass.

  37. - AnonymousOne - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 4:54 pm:

    New York the highest tax state in the country. Why aren’t they fleeing? Besides, where will they all go? Illinois is a low tax state. Check it out.

  38. - Federalist - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 5:05 pm:

    @Arizona Bob

    Their tax policy is simple.Charge no or low income taxes on 60% of the voters so that they don’t care if you raise taxes to outragous levels on the remaining 40%.

    Unfortunately, this comment has too much truth. It certainly is done at the federal level and in my opinion makes for a more dysfunctional democracy where fewer citizens really care about economic and taxation policies.

  39. - Siriusly - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 5:16 pm:

    Sorry Jake, but a 5% increase does not mean revenue neutral. That’s almost $2 billion more in actual people’s money you’re talking about. How is that neutral?

  40. - Federalist - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 5:23 pm:

    @ AnonymousOne

    The data source you give appears to give 2002 data.

    And it provided no info on Corporate taxes.

    More recently New York has been breaking its back to give all types of tax incentives for businesses to come to NY. To me. this is a bad policy.

    I will stand by my original analysis.

  41. - What is to be done? - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 6:17 pm:

    Tax the rich, feed the poor
    Till there are no rich no more

    I’d love to change the world
    But I don’t know what to do
    So I’ll leave it up to you

  42. - Federalist - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 6:19 pm:

    If those who support a graduated tax why did the stop at $500,000.

    Why not conitnue it for the really wealthy?

    %500-1000K 10%; $1000-2000K 11% and keep going.

    Really this mostly targets the upper middle class and not the truly rich in terms of 2014 financial realities.

  43. - Pacman - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 6:29 pm:

    Taxing pensions may cause a mass exodus of retirees. High property taxes coupled with a tax on pensions would cause me and others to consider moving to TN, Fl, Tx, or maybe NV. Only thing keeping me in Illinois now is family and friends, sure isn’t the weather!

  44. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 6:33 pm:

    === Why aren’t they fleeing? ===

    “New York State continues a long-standing trend of seeing more residents move to other states than move in, and gains in international migration have not overcome the loss, according to census data released this week.”

    “The frustration over taxes and registration fees is driving more people to leave New York than any other state in the nation. That means fewer people paying taxes, buying homes and going to restaurants.”

  45. - Anonymous - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 6:55 pm:

    There goes the last high wage earners to Florida residency. Lets all wave BYE BYE! STOP_STOP_STOP trying to fix this State by taxing more. Stop spending first at all levels. The state brings in an exorbitant amount of money. Make due with it!
    DO THE MATH, taking 7% of a 400k family removes almost $2500 a month from them. Good luck with that, I’m sure they will not plan around that! BYE, BYE last high wage earners.

  46. - Anonymous - Thursday, Mar 6, 14 @ 6:59 pm:

    I’m leaving this Liberal experiment. Enjoy what will be left. Look at the business and industrial park vacancies as they are now! My wife and I will be gone this summer for good. Sorry to abandon ship but this is the Titanic and I have seen the future!

  47. - Ahoy! - Friday, Mar 7, 14 @ 8:55 am:

    –Ahoy, do you think there will be a $500,000/year job waiting for you in Chattanooga!?–

    If you have a skill set that warrants $500,000 a year, can pretty much live anywhere you want. Maybe even in Chattanooga , but maybe Nashville, Memphis, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, Miami, Orlando, etc.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Caption contest!
* Crossing the line
* Moody's warns Illinois
* The Credit Union Difference
* *** UPDATED x1 - Franks responds *** Uh-oh
* Then and now
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Visit our advertisers...







Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

* Review: Mophie's Juice Pack Reserve & Power Reserve Offer Power in Small Packages
* Uber Chases The Perfect Ride With Back-To-Back Trips
* Google rumored to assist Samsung with TouchWiz optimization
* Google updates ramp up of AMP
* Bodle working on phone screen that uses less energy
* Google Accelerated Mobile Pages will start speeding up the mobile web early next year
* Black Friday mobile deals and the quest for Inbox Zero | Pocketnow Weekly 176

* White Sox sign catcher Avila to one-year deal
* Tommy Kahnle enters, Geovany Soto departs
* White Sox acquire Kahnle in deal with Rockies
* White Sox acquire RHP Tommy Kahnle from Rockies for RHP Yency Almonte
* White Sox acquire Kahnle in deal with Rockies
* KBO's Jae-gyun Hwang can be posted after all
* White Sox Charities all about opportunities


Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0


* *** UPDATED x1 - Franks responds *** Uh-oh - Th.....
* Illinois Makes Tax-Break Deals with 3 Companies.....
* Rauner Says Homeland Security to Address Syrian.....
* Rep. Brady: Safety should be top concern in see.....
* Illinois makes tax-break deals with 3 companies.....
* Illinois makes tax-break deals with 3 companies.....

* Springfield police chief bemoans body-cam 'burden'
* EXCHANGE: Fire training buildings adapt to versatile needs
* Amtrak ramps up service, offers tips for holiday travel
* Bishop Hill Museum acquires early painting by folk artist
* State treasurer to hold online auction of unclaimed property
* Man gets 16 years for sexually assaulting a woman he knew
* U of Illinois group looking for chancellor led by professor
* Illinois makes tax-break deals with 3 companies
* Suburban Chicago teacher sentenced for child pornography
* N. Illinois University removes Bibles from campus hotel

* Springfield police chief sees problems with body cam law
* Lawsuit challenges Illinois ban on marijuana campaign money
* Number of Illinois inmates released on parole climbing
* Bryce Benton circulating petitions to challenge Sen. Sam McCann in GOP primary
* Executive Mansion roof repairs nearing completion
* Candidates begin filing petitions for March primary election
* Benton circulating petitions to challenge McCann in GOP primary
* Rauner administration says House Democrats holding local aid hostage
* Rauner says White House promises to answer refugee queries
* More honors for Auburn woman who saved man from train

* Review: Sociale in the South Loop
* Her Barbie was a lawyer. Now she defends victims' rights
* United offers pilots 13% raise
* Shire prepares to make new bid for Baxalta
* Illinois makes tax-break deals with 3 companies

* Reasons Blackhawks fans should be thankfull
* Mitchell: “Hideous” video tells an even more hideous story
* Marchers protest CPD handling of Laquan McDonald’s murder
* Mihalopoulos: Laquan McDonald video could define state’s attorney’s race
* Patrick Kane’s point streak nearing historic levels
* Uber cleared to serve O’Hare, Midway airports
* McCarthy: “Nonsense” to claim his firing of Dante Servin was politically timed
* Quickie quiz: Only player to score goal at United Center, Soldier Field and Wrigley Field?
* Black Caucus chairman: What took Alvarez so long to file charges?
* Veljko Paunovic announced as new Fire coach

* Home invasion charges for man sought in ex-girlfriend's disappearance
* Illinois treasurer to hold online auction of unclaimed property
* Aspiring poet and protest organizer among those arrested during Loop video protest
* 7 shot, 1 fatally, in shootings on the South Side
* Traffic halted, but few arrests, as hundreds march in Loop after video release
* Shooting video latest stain on Chicago's policing record
* A moment by moment account of what the Laquan McDonald video shows

* Michael Gerson: The Trump effect, still 'understated'
* Catherine Rampell: For millennials, first comes love — then what?
* Springfield police chief sees problems with body cam law
* Lawsuit challenges Illinois ban on marijuana campaign money
* Number of Illinois inmates released on parole climbing
* Lawsuit challenges Illinois ban on marijuana campaign money
* Kathleen Parker: Crazy is as crazy does
* Bryce Benton circulating petitions to challenge Sen. Sam McCann in GOP primary
* Executive Mansion roof repairs nearing completion
* Candidates begin filing petitions for March primary election

* 11-25-15 Dr. Tom Ramage, President of @ParklandCollege
* 11-25-15 Penny for Your Thoughts
* PODCAST: Groce previews UAB
* Mississippi River bridge at St. Louis to reopen next month
* Deere's profit tops forecasts even as its sales fall sharply
* Cheap gas fueling expanded Thanksgiving travel day
* Pope arrives in Kenya in pilgrimage to 3 African countries
* Some in military suspended for deadly Afghan hospital attack
* Chicago awaits more protests over police shooting
* Putin sends air-defense missiles to Syria to deter Turkey

* EPA nixes approval of new weed killer for engineered crops
* Trooper leaves hospital, teen charged in Philadelphia chase
* Growth _ but not expansion _ in US Internet gambling market
* Woodson, Rivers, Megatron among sportsmanship award nominees
* Fox Lake musician wins Bob Hope Award

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Nebraska ethanol producers name former Dur......
* Rauner Says Homeland Security to Address S......

* Kirk co-authors Government Transformation ......

* EXTRA: Who pays politically for death of McDonald at hands of cop?
* Poe's 99th District replacement moves to State House from Governor's office
* Jim Edgar is wrong about undocumented immigrants
* Registered.
* Free Malcolm London.
* Sunday posts, pics and tweets.
* “The Driver’s Side” – News From The Motorist’s Perspective
* Laquan McDonald Protesters Produce Traffic Chaos Tuesday Night
* 4635 Broadway Begins Its Renovation
* A violent overtone to this week of thanks; will it be ugly Black Friday?

* Emergency Management Officials, National Weather Service Encourage Winter Preparedness - November is Winter Weather Preparedness Month in Illinois
* Keep Your Family Safe This Winter - November through February are leading months for carbon monoxide related incidents
* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Illinois Department of Labor Director Hugo Chaviano Awards Governor’s Award for Contributions in Health and Safety to the Illinois Refining Division of Marathon Petroleum Company LP
* State Regulator Elected Treasurer of Interstate Medical Licensure Compact

    Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller