Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Staff survey on legislative influence
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Staff survey on legislative influence

Wednesday, Jun 28, 2006

State Legislatures Magazine recently completed a survey of legislative staffs across the nation. Karl Kurtz at NCSL’s blog The Thicket gives us a preview.

One of the questions we asked was, on a scale of 1-no influence to 7-dictates policy, “What do you think is the relative influence of the following participants in the legislative process in determining legislative outcomes in your state?” Of the 11 choices that we gave our 1,522 respondents to the survey, majority party leadership ranked far and away the highest with a score of 5.9.

Also scoring 5 or more were the senate (5.2), the house (5.1), the governor (5.0) and committee chairs (5.0). These four scores are so close that they can be considered to be equal.

Interest groups/lobbyists scored 4.8 and executive agency staff 4.0. Regarded as relatively less influential in the process were partisan staff and the media (both 3.6), nonpartisan staff (3.3) and, bringing up the rear, minority party leadership (3.0).

I wonder what the Illinois crosstabs were? For you staffers and former staffers out there, is this about right?

UPDATE: Karl gives us a peek at the Illinois crosstabs, which are not statistically significant since there were so few of them (just 19 out of a nationwide total of more than 1500 - which doesn’t surprise me in the least).

But, for what it’s worth, Illinois respondents did score the majority party leadership somewhat higher at 6.3 on a scale of 1-7. There were only two other major differences in the responses from Illinois compared to the rest of the country: the House was regarded as more influential than the Senate, and the influence of partisan staff was ranked considerably higher.

Staff has enormous influence in Illinois, so that’s definitely on the money.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - anon - Wednesday, Jun 28, 06 @ 10:09 am:

    I’d bump up the majority party leadership all the way to a 7 in Illinois. Also, I would lower the committee chairs # as they are pretty much just carrying out orders from above anyway.

  2. - ZC - Wednesday, Jun 28, 06 @ 10:26 am:

    It may not be possible to get significant results for just Illinois - though I wish! With an N of 1500, assuming they polled all 50 legislatures then that is a measly N of 30 for Illinois, for a big margin of error. Granted IL is a big state, so more staffers were probably sampled, but my guess is well under 100. It would still be fascinating to see the crosstabs, but you wouldn’t want to place much trust in them.

  3. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Jun 28, 06 @ 11:46 am:

    Beware of results like this. When you have four options coming out about the same, you should consider something wrong. The respondents didn’t feel like they could answer the question authoritatively, or the question wasn’t understood, or the ranking was too confusing, something.

    If you drop the whole ranking part of this story, there isn’t any news there.

  4. - Reddbyrd - Wednesday, Jun 28, 06 @ 12:01 pm:

    Wonder how the minority party got so high —3?
    Seems like 0.5 wonder be about right.

  5. - ron - Wednesday, Jun 28, 06 @ 3:21 pm:

    i would like to know who advised durbin and obama to vote no on allowing the flag to be burned. the constitution protects free speech not free expression. they surely were not listening to the citizens of illinois who support the amendment by a wide majority. funny how durbin and obama can quote polls showing over 50% of people are unhappy with iraq as justification to pull out, while neglecting polls with upwards of 70%+ supporting the flag amendment.

  6. - anon - Wednesday, Jun 28, 06 @ 4:11 pm:

    This is a data set that argues against legislative term limits. The 4.8 goes through the roof without legislative leadership.

  7. - Karl Kurtz - Wednesday, Jun 28, 06 @ 4:19 pm:

    Thanks for running this piece. Whenever you mention our NCSL blog, The Thicket, our page views go way up.

    Since there seems to be a lot of interest in this in Illinois judging by the comments, I took a look at the Illinois cross tabs for the survey. Unfortunately, ZC is more than right in his comment above: Illinois was substantially under-represented in the survey because we got only 19 responses (out of 1,522 nationally) from the state. So you can’t take much stock in the cross tabs. But, for what it’s worth, Illinois respondents did score the majority party leadership somewhat higher at 6.3 on a scale of 1-7. There were only two other major differences in the responses from Illinois compared to the rest of the country: the House was regarded as more influential than the Senate, and the influence of partisan staff was ranked considerably higher.

  8. - the Other Anonymous - Thursday, Jun 29, 06 @ 8:55 am:

    It’s not surprising that staff in Illinois are considered more powerful than in other states. Legislative staff in Springfield are (is?) not independent — they simply extensions of the party leadership.

    Since party, particularly majority party, leadership has a virtual lock on any legislative activity, staff has strong derivative powers. I bet that most people around the rail think that a legislator’s personal staff — the administrative assistant in the district office — doesn’t have much power at all.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Question of the day
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition, fundraiser calendar and a campaign roundup
* Oops!
* The governor's tears
* Republicans getting clobbered in the money race
* Rauner sticks up for... the media?
* Pence: "We also cut the heart out of Obamacare"
* Mendoza for mayor petitions circulated
* Judges turn on one of their own
* Priorities are out of whack
* "If Caldwell had been prosecuted when he first appeared on the ATF’s radar, Paul Bauer might be alive today"
* Raoul talks about being a cancer survivor in new TV ad
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Oppo dump!
* Rate Sam McCann's new TV ad
* Wordslinger's comment would be a good place to start for Pritzker
* Rauner has to explain immigration stance at photo op
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Daily Herald endorses Pritzker
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller