Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Birkett, Madigan square off on abortion
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Birkett, Madigan square off on abortion

Wednesday, Dec 20, 2006

Apparently, the 2002 attorney geneneral’s race has never quite ended.

DuPage County State’s Atty. Joseph Birkett said he is prepared to go to court within weeks to try to revive a 1995 state law that bars minors from obtaining abortions without notifying a parent.

Three months ago, the Illinois Supreme Court issued key rules that had been needed for the Parental Notice of Abortion Act to take effect.

Since then, Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan has reviewed the issue, but has not yet tried to overturn the federal court order that has left the law dormant for 11 years.

“She’s got to take a stand,” Birkett said this week. “The law is now complete, so we need to move to lift the injunction. … It’s not a complicated issue. It’s relatively simple and straightforward.”

Might this be the first shot in the 2010 AG campaign?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Wumpus - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 9:58 am:

    Oh, it ended as soon as the votes were counted. He has a point, a minor cannot go to a tanning booth, get ears pierced, but can get an abortion, that is ludicrous on it’ face. Birkett has a point. I do fear that he is becoming one of the perennial candidates liek Oberwies, Cox and Rauschy. Sad thing is that he should have been AG and Lt Gov, but the voters ahve spoken…twice.

  2. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 10:00 am:

    No. What Burkett is doing is bring some attention to himself. It seems many believe he is one of the last of the Mohicans.

    What he says is right too. Isn’t it appropriate to expect the AG to do her job? Lets not make more politics out of this - do what the law requires.

    Thats all.

  3. - Snark - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 10:23 am:

    What’s a Birkett?

  4. - Skeeter - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 10:40 am:

    The 2010 AG campaign?

    Does anybody really think that A.G. Madigan will seek another term?

    She’s moving up. If a Dem takes the White House in 2008, she has to be absolutely at the top of the list for a federal judgeship (she would be great on the 7th Cir.) and if they don’t, then Blago or Quinn will be forced to step aside (by primary voters if necessary) to clear her way to the gov’s office.

    On the other hand, I wouldn’t rule out that Birkett is picking this fight to gain pub for a race against Sen. Durbin.

  5. - Veritas - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 11:06 am:

    The GOP in Illinois is in dire need of a credible spokesman capable of offering the party a sense of direction. Expect Oberwiese, Brady and Birkett each to take their turn at the podium in an attempt to rally the base.

  6. - fedup dem - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 11:33 am:

    I view this as a weak attempt by Birkett to protect his butt from a challenger in his re-election bid for DuPage State’s Attorney in 2008. Forget about him being the sacrifical lamb against Durbin; I don’t believe Birkett is that stupid to do that.

  7. Pingback Reverse Spin » She’s got the far left covered… - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 11:53 am:

    […] Rich Miller is inviting comments on the Trib story. […]

  8. - cermak_rd - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 12:13 pm:

    He’d have to be a complete idiot to run against Madigan for Attorney General again. She lost support in her first run against him because she was viewed as being inexperienced, which was the only ding he had against her. She doesn’t have that ding anymore and would bury him. Anti-abortion isn’t a stance that plays real well in IL, we may not like it but seem happy with the laws on the books. Lisa would probably prefer to be “forced” by a judge to lift the injunction rather than being seen to be lifting itself herself.

  9. - steve schnorf - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 1:22 pm:

    I harken to Froelich’s comments; fight tomorrow’s battles, not yesterday’s. Using this wedge issue will serve Joe well in DuPage, and perhaps in one or two suburban Congressional districts (although, in neither as well as it would have 10 years ago). However, I continue to believe that it is and will become increasingly almost impossible to elect to a significant statewide office a candidate who bases his public persona on pro-life, pro-gun and anti-gay stances.

    I think the great middle doesn’t care a lot about politicians’ personal beliefs on those issues, but they care big time about someone they fear is bent on imposing them on others. For example, that’s why I believe Bill Brady has a great future; he isn’t scary to the great middle because those issues aren’t his primary persona (he will have to be careful about what he says and does in contested primaries). As always, I may be wrong.

  10. - Angie - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 2:56 pm:

    Lisa should really move it on this issue, as most sane people support minor notification.

    It isn’t “anti-choice” at all, but perhaps actually acknowledging that little fact might make the rest of the liberals look bad, as every single time you open a paper to read about the issue, when it is a liberal, they lump anything that smacks of a regulation of some sort into the “anti-choice” category.

    I’m pro-choice, but if I had a teenager (and I don’t, by the way), I’d sure as heck want to know about it if my kid were having a medical procedure performed. What if something happens and the kid gets ill in the process, or something? Tell your parents, for crying out loud. If the family is seriously messed-up and abusive, then they can have a social worker intervene in some way, I’m sure.

    Illinois is just looking oh-so-bad over this.

    Lisa is doing very well on other issues, so hopefully, she will move on this sensible issue when someone talks some sense into her. It won’t make her look “anti-choice” at all. We know she’s pro-choice already.

  11. - Mr. Luxury Yacht - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 3:21 pm:

    IMHO, methinks Mr. Burkett is not positioning himself for AG - but to run against Lisa for GOV. in 2010. He clearly thought he was (for some unfathomable reason) the better of the two on the JBT ticket this time around. As with so many in politics, his ego is prompting him to try to fail upwards (cf George W. Bush). I guess since he was never convicted of anything with regard to all of the reprehensible behavior of prosecutors in the Cruz case - at least not yet - he assumes that by comparison to the stellar combination of felons-to-be and Bland Rich Guys on the R side, his peculiar brand of so-called conservatism will yield a base that can topple the incredible D advantage in this State right now.

    Let’s just say that, as with her father, Mr. Burkett underestimates the Attorney General at his peril. In electoral terms, she will reach down his throat and pull his lungs out.

  12. - Not So Fast - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 4:49 pm:

    If Birkett is such an eagle-eyed law enforcer, how was one of his employees able to steal half a million dollars from a fund meant to compensate victims? If you can’t police your own people, what hope do you have against the general public?

  13. - One_Mcmad - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 5:14 pm:

    Way to go Attorney General Joe Birkett!

    “Take A Stand”

  14. - Tessa - Wednesday, Dec 20, 06 @ 5:18 pm:

    Seems to me Birkett is trying to keep his name in the papers and this is a “good” way for him to do it. I don’t agree with his way of doing it, but he’s doing it.

    And if Lisa runs for Gov, and he runs against her, she would bury him.

  15. - East Side Lou - Thursday, Dec 21, 06 @ 7:58 am:

    It’s all political grandstanding but that’s not the point. Can you imagine the family life a child must have, to feel that you can’t go to your parents for comfort and support with one of the biggest decisions she will ever make in her life. You can’t legislate family relationships and that’s where it all starts. Pitty!

  16. - Angie - Thursday, Dec 21, 06 @ 4:27 pm:

    Re: “You can’t legislate family relationships and that’s where it all starts.”

    It is a medical procedure. Why shouldn’t a parent be entitled to know if the minor girl is going under anesthesia? What if something goes wrong, even in a rare case, and then that poor parent may never have gotten to talk to that minor if (knock on wood it never happens) someone has serious complications that end in death. It could happen, and so why is abortion exempt from parental notification?

    Lisa? Are you ever on Cap Fax? Move it on this issue, please. It is a bipartisan-supported, common-sense issue.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Pritzker "outraged" over "gross mistakes" by "irresponsible" DCFS contractor: "These children are our children"
* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Judge knocks down Deerfield assault weapons ban
* Question of the day
* Pritzker appoints 5 new SIU trustees
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser lists
* "It’s a car in a very small tunnel"
* Illinois Family Institute calls legislator a "feticidal maniac"
* DCFS contract caseworker under investigation
* It's just a bill
* College Illinois bailout will cost state $501 million
* After Sterigenics shutdown, EPA testing shows "a pretty rapid drop" in cancer-causing chemical emissions
* Moylan's "go slow on pot" resolution reaches majority support
* Chicago isn't the outlier, Downstate is
* Dueling arguments
* Another self-own
* *** UPDATED x1 - Daniels responds *** Strip club manager's "fears" are unfounded
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...











Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller