|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Watson; Hastert; Ameren; Latinos (Use all caps in password)
Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller
Enter your password to view comments |
|
Question of the day *** Updated x1 ***
Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller [Bumped to the top for discussion purposes.] Carol Marin’s column today is about the hurdles faced by female candidates. And just Tuesday, Thomas B. Edsall’s New York Times column pointed to what he called “disturbing” Democratic numbers. “In the 42 top-tier ‘Red to Blue’ races selected by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for intensive financing and support, 25 of the candidates were male and 17 were female,” wrote Edsall. “In those contests, male candidates batted .800: 20 victories to five defeats. The women faced higher barriers: three won and 14 lost, batting .176.” Which is the “larger liability” in American politics today? Gender or race? Explain. *** UPDATE *** As if on cue, we have some new polling numbers. CNN just ran results from an Opinion Research Corporation poll that asked two questions:
And here’s the story:
I think a much better question to ask would be “Would you rule out voting for a black or female presidential candidate?” and I think there was a poll earlier this year about the female side of that (with quite a few saying “No”) but I haven’t been able to find it yet.
|
|
Obamarama
Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller Obama appeared yesterday at a public hearing by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health to push for compensation for poisoned workers, but his mere presence was more interesting to some.
But this hearing did deal with an important issue.
Meanwhile, one of the AP’s top political reporters demonstrated once again why the Beltway media crowd is such an object of derision. Check out this lede:
* And Jeff Greenfield, who used to be a decent reporter, has apparently lost his freaking mind. This Greenfield piece for CNN has been making the rounds on the blogs this week.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Washington, DC - all of it, from the very tippity top right down to the lowliest janitor who thinks he owns the place - is the problem.
|
|
Morning shorts
Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller * Don’t forget about tonight’s party * Hester vs. Hastert * Fox Lake to drop ComEd service after January deregulation * Editorial: A bit of advice for governor’s top advisers * Indiana, Illinois agree to study proposed toll road… More here * Editorial: State owns homes; it should be able to knock them down * Report: State faster in investigating abuse, but still too slow * Editorial: `Willfully ignorant’ * Kadner: Chicago’s security blanket: Richard Daley for mayor
* Kass: How not to treat your guardian Angelo * Retail Sales Surge in November * Sick workers should get paid, Obama says * Latino community rallies around stricken family - Goal is raise enough to send bodies of Carpentersville family back to Mexico for burial * Trees for Troops a way to say thanks
|
|
Daley does one-on-ones
Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller Instead of answering detailed questions at a campaign announcement press conference, Mayor Daley had reporters lining up yesterday for ten minute, one-on-one interviews. Here are some highlights: * Sun-Times: City casino ‘not on our priority list’
* The Crain’s interview in full can be downloaded here [mp3 file]
* AP: Daley cites “few bad apples'’ for City Hall problems
* NBC5: Mayor Talks About Corruption, Iraq, Passion For Job [video is here]
* The Tribune story concentrated mostly on the mechanics of the interview process.
|
|
Another big idea with no money
Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller Although I’m sure it will take heat from people who think that it’s a cover to help illegals, this seems like a decent idea.
The last four or five small-town, Downstate restaurants I’ve eaten at (far outside Springfield in previously all-Anglo areas) had a surprisingly large number of Latino, Southastern European and even Arabic employees, so just based on that admittedly cursory observation, the help may be needed. But, as always with this administration, there’s a big announcement with no funding attached.
Thoughts?
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |








