Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Dold doubles down on Schock money
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Dold doubles down on Schock money

Monday, Mar 30, 2015

* Congressman Bob Dold still refuses to jettison disgraced Congressman Aaron Schock’s $10,000 campaign contribution. From the National Journal

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has already called on Republicans who accepted money from Schock to return their contributions, specifically highlighting Dold and other vulnerable House Republicans.

Dold spokeswoman Danielle Hagen said that “not one penny of these contributions remain in Congressman Dold’s account.”

What, did Schock donate with marked $100 bills or something?

Oh, come on, man. Your campaign committee is now $10,000 ahead of where it would’ve been had it not been for that Schock contribution.

Give it away now.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

23 Comments
  1. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 11:40 am:

    Optics are bad here.

    Just donate the money to charity and hit up the RCCC for the $10K


  2. - allknowingmasterofracoondom - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 11:42 am:

    OW you are right on here. Pretty simple fix to otherwise bad optics. What is he waiting for….


  3. - Dirty Red - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 11:44 am:

    Is there suddenly a money shortage in the 10th that he is now so desperate? This could be a key issue used to raise money against him. What is the real value of that contribution?


  4. - Montrose - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 11:46 am:

    I cannot see any way the pros of keeping the money outweigh the cons.


  5. - 47th Ward - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 11:47 am:

    ===Give it away now.===

    No, he should hang onto to it. That way if Schock is formally charged with serious wrong-doing, Dold can get another black eye closer to the election. This will let him turn Schock’s $10K into a $100K for his opponent.

    Return it now or return it later with even more bad press potentially attached? Yep, that’s a tough call.


  6. - Not it - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 11:48 am:

    Sold can probably afford to give back the money, but what about everyone else that received a Schock contribution? If Dold gives it back doesn’t that increase pressure on all the others?


  7. - MrJM - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:02 pm:

    Dold spokeswoman Danielle Hagen said that “not one penny of these contributions remain in Congressman Dold’s account.”

    fun·gi·ble adj. able to replace or be replaced by another identical item; mutually interchangeable.

    Are there any non-clowns in Dold’s operation?

    – MrJM


  8. - Not it - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:02 pm:

    (*Sold = Dold, autocorrect, not intended to be a pun.)


  9. - pundent - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:03 pm:

    The $10K will soon be worth more to Dold’s opponents than it is to him. I expect he’ll reconsider his comments rather quickly as a result.


  10. - Wordslinger - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:05 pm:

    LOL, how much in “earned media” do you think Dold will get as a result of the National Journal piece? Lot more than $10K, that’s for sure.

    Not a penny remains — what does that mean, we spent it already? Is that a gag, or are they that thick?

    What would you call that? “Not-a-penny- wise, going-to-get-pounded foolish?”


  11. - A guy - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:19 pm:

    Dumb. $10K with bad juju all over it. Give it away to a popular charity in the district. Yesterday.


  12. - Shore - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:19 pm:

    I hope we’re not going to start running these committee press releases every time they come out now 18 months out of an election. So many more worthwhile stories.


  13. - Arsenal - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:22 pm:

    Dold has taken money from people I find far more odious than Aaron Schock.

    Come to think of it, politicians I really like and admire have almost certainly taken money from people worse than Schock, too.


  14. - Anonymous - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:35 pm:

    He would want you to keep it cuz it’s one Grand Old Party.


  15. - lou brock - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:37 pm:

    Peoria City Council candidates Chuck Weaver and Eric Turner have still not returned their contributions from Aaron Schock - $5000 and $2500 respectively


  16. - How Ironic - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 12:51 pm:

    “Dold spokeswoman Danielle Hagen said that “not one penny of these contributions remain in Congressman Dold’s account.”

    As if that makes it ‘right’. Your honor, my client doesn’t have one penny of the embezzled funds in their account any longer. Clearly, this excuses the crime, and he should be allowed to walk.

    “Not one bullet remained in the chamber, therefore you can’t prove who fired the gun”

    What a dope.


  17. - Anonymous - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 1:04 pm:

    The money was given to Schock by people supporting him on issues. Why should it be given away to charity. Were all the donations raised by Congressman Jackson over the years donated to charity?


  18. - Streator Curmudgeon - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 1:07 pm:

    The presidents on those bills have small mouths, but they speak loudly.


  19. - illini - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 2:23 pm:

    Didn’t Mike Bost get money as well?


  20. - The Way I See It - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 5:10 pm:

    Its totally a questions of optics, nothing more. This isn’t a situation where Schock obtained the money illegitimately and tried to use it buy access and adulation. This was all raised by him, presumably properly. No casual observer of politics will get the difference and the PR cost is much greater than $10K. Costly money indeed.


  21. - Rich Miller - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 5:14 pm:

    ===Its totally a questions of optics, nothing more===

    LOL

    You think allegations of taxpayer theft are pure optics?


  22. - walker - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 6:14 pm:

    Mr Dold please review what your spokesperson has to say on sensitive issues, so that such foolishness is avoided.


  23. - illini - Monday, Mar 30, 15 @ 8:47 pm:

    Should have read the National Journal article before I commented earlier. Rep. Bost was a recipient of his money. I thought my memory was correct. In addition, Rep. Davis received money as well and if I am not mistaken he was appointed to chair a House committee to review Congressional ethics, inappropriate activities and put in charge of trying to “clean house”.

    So if Rodney Davis has not relinquished his money, and he is charged with reviewing ethics and propriety among his peers, it strikes me as this being an ultimate insult to the citizens who elected him.

    Putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop!!!!

    Optics, indeed - hypocrisy, certainly.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed until Tuesday
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Tribune asked 16 mayoral candidates to release tax returns, 6 complied
* A rough idea of what they're looking at
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Rauner was wrong about "record levels" of unionization
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY: Stava-Murray updates
* Pritzker's inauguration ball tix will benefit Cabrini Green Legal Aid Clinic and Illinois Fairgrounds Foundation
* Rauner claims he's been too busy to reflect on his term
* Pritzker's day in DC
* *** UPDATED x3 - Morrison wants emergency meeting of ILGOP - McConnaughay explains - Schneider responds *** Rauner says he tried to drop out of race after primary
* Feds re-raid Ald. Burke's office
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller