Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Pot, meet kettle
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pot, meet kettle

Tuesday, Mar 31, 2015

* From a July, 2010 press release

Tenth District Congressional candidate Robert Dold called on opponent Dan Seals today to return his $41,217 contribution from the Rangel Victory Fund. Yesterday it was disclosed and widely reported that the House Ethics Committee will charge New York Representative Charles Rangel with multiple ethics violations.

Rep. Rangel is among Seals’s largest contributors. In March 2010, after the House began its initial probe into Rangel’s alleged ethics violations, Seals gave $14,000 in contributions from Rangel to charity. Despite Dold’s urging, Seals has thus far refused to return the full $55,217 he has received from Rangel during his six-year run for the 10th District Congressional seat.

On August 20, 2008, Seals received $41,217 from the Rangel Victory Fund.

“Dan Seals should know that the right thing to do is to return the tainted Rangel money,” said Dold. “Illinois voters have had enough of unethical politicians.”

You’ll recall that Congressman Dold has refused to jettison the $10,000 he received from now disgraced almost former Congressman Aaron Schock. Dold’s spokesperson said that the Schock money had all been spent, but that two-year-old Rangel contribution was also surely gone by July of 2010.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

30 Comments
  1. - A guy - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 1:32 pm:

    Taint is taint whether it’s $40K or $10K. The only difference is the number. Unload the dough Bob where it can do something besides attract criticism.

    Rangel sure was more generous with the honey pot than Schock.


  2. - OneMan - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 1:38 pm:

    That’s different because it was the other guys money


  3. - sal-says - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 1:39 pm:

    Just nothin’ like hypocrisy.


  4. - Wensicia - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 2:00 pm:

    Do as I say, not as I do.


  5. - DuPage - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 2:03 pm:

    Ethics. A word unfamiliar to most politicians, especially ones getting money from 1%ers.


  6. - Annon3 - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 2:05 pm:

    He must be banking on very few people from Kenliworth read this blog!


  7. - illini - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 2:11 pm:

    Again, look at my comments yesterday - neither Davis or Bost ( from my part of the state ) have made any amends for receiving tainted money or at least not to my knowledge. And now Davis is chairing a House committee to review the ethics of its own members.

    And I do acknowledge that this issue cuts both ways, whether D or R - that still does not make it right or acceptable


  8. - Precinct Captain - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 2:45 pm:

    Bozo Bob Dold is at it again with rank hypocrisy? I’m shocked!


  9. - Huh? - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 2:56 pm:

    I don’t understand this rush to donate cash from a disgraced politician. From my perspective, it is a little like Schock repaying to the government ill gotten gand due to false travel vouchers. How does that undo the crime?

    How does donating the cash undo the receiving the supposedly tainted cash?


  10. - Concerned - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 3:04 pm:

    Hey Huh, the point is that, whether you think there is a moral or logical basis for returning the cash or not, it has become the thing to do under these sorts of circumstances. Others do it and, importantly to this thread, Dold has demanded that others return the cash in like circumstances. Yet when called upon to do the same, he finds an excuse not to. That, my friend, is called hypocrisy!


  11. - Amateur Hour - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 3:04 pm:

    Prior to this revelation, I would have said don’t return the money. Now it’s pretty clear Dold has to follow his own standards. This is literally the exact same situation in reverse. Great ad.


  12. - Chris - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 3:11 pm:

    It’s like a bad rendition of Casablanca:

    I am shocked! Shocked!!! To hear hypocrisy from a Congressman.

    Of all the campaign funds of all the politicians in all the world, he had to deposit money into mine.


  13. - Larouchebag - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 3:18 pm:

    After this, why the heck would anyone vote for someone as callous as Dold? He must think his voters are real idiots.


  14. - Guru - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 3:26 pm:

    Let’s not forget the Dold attack on Seals for living outside the district. Has anyone seen Dold moving into the 10th district after six years of promising to move north? Problem will be solved when he decides to run for the Senate seat.


  15. - illini - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 3:54 pm:

    It appears once again that I among a select few South of I-80 that chooses to comment. Maybe because this is largely R country. Where is the outrage with Bost and Davis and the money they received??????????

    Or has this issue become old news?

    If the situation were reversed, I am relatively certain the outrage would have been different!


  16. - mcb - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 3:59 pm:

    One big difference for now is that Schock hasn’t been charged with anything.


  17. - Chris - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 4:01 pm:

    “One big difference for now is that Schock hasn’t been charged with anything.”

    Another big different is that Rangel didn’t resign to avoid being charged by the House. Indeed, Rangel was re-elected afterward…


  18. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 4:06 pm:

    With all do respect to the posters and author, these two cases are totally different.

    1. Rangel is black.
    2. Rangel is a Democrat.

    It is no secret that we hold African American politicians, particularly Democratic ones, to a different standard, especially when it comes to alleged corruption.


  19. - Six Degrees of Separation - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 4:40 pm:

    YDD, it is noted that Rangel is still in office while Schock is not.


  20. - Carl Nyberg - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 4:48 pm:

    I suppose if Rangel had resigned from Congress, he wouldn’t be in Congress either.


  21. - anonin' - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 5:20 pm:

    When Dold is done with the bob abd weave we know a place in the 18th that will accept the donation and say thanks


  22. - illini - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 5:51 pm:

    YDD - I’m not at all certain that I share your perspectives. I am a solid D and am as critical of my own party as I am of the other side.


  23. - big noise - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 6:24 pm:

    is bob dold moving into his congressional district? any news? i assume his school age kids would finish their year, but then….?


  24. - low level - Tuesday, Mar 31, 15 @ 7:25 pm:

    Illini - no need to share his perspectives.
    That is why it’s called an opinion.

    YDD is exactly correct. Rangel is the wrong everything, from Harlem no less! and Schock is all the right demographics from good old Peoria.

    But if it is tainted it is trained Bob! Bob! Dold


  25. - Whateves - Wednesday, Apr 1, 15 @ 12:23 am:

    Obfuscate. Political operatives - Google the word. This is simple the DCCC trying to spin the truth. You make it seem like Dold accepted $10,000 from Schock in the 2016 cycle. Not true. He took $10,000 in 2013 and March 2014. It’s gone. And look up “obfuscate”.


  26. - Whateves - Wednesday, Apr 1, 15 @ 12:24 am:

    Obfuscate. Political operatives - Google the word. This is simple the DCCC trying to spin the truth. You make it seem like Dold accepted $10,000 from Schock in the 2014 cycle. Not true. He took $10,000 in 2013 and March 2014. It’s gone. And look up “obfuscate”.


  27. - Really? - Wednesday, Apr 1, 15 @ 12:41 am:

    Whateves: Seriously? Dold can fork over 10 grand that he has raised since if he actually cared about ethics.

    Let’s all remember this when we see another commercial about him being independent aND thoughtful.

    There goes the rumor that Kirk was going to step down so Dold can run for Senate…or is that still possible?


  28. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Apr 1, 15 @ 8:32 am:

    Dold needs to take the money and ensure that he gets it to every charity he would like to get a PR boost from. Acknowledge who gave him the money, explain what he is doing with it, and then before the press, tell the District why the good folks at the charity selected, gets money for the good work they do.

    Eat crow. Make it look tasty. Make political opponents wish they had crow to eat too.


  29. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Apr 1, 15 @ 8:43 am:

    Dold should have Congressman Rangel visit during the campaign and do the honor of handing out the Schock contribution. You know, filthy congressman with no conscience with filthy money, handing out the filthy money donated by a filthy congressman with enough conscience to resign - it all would fit very well.


  30. - Wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 1, 15 @ 9:03 am:

    Dolds getting a lot of free publicity for that $10K.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner vetoes second bill to address gender wage gap
* Munger moves to DCEO
* Preckwinkle mayoral announcement roundup
* Follow the money
* Empty threat? Or does somebody know something we don't?
* A couple of quick debate clips
* Supremes side with hospitals on property taxes
* Report: IEPA stonewalls AG until HGOP leader steps in
* A TIF primer
* Raoul's new ad blasts Harold over abortion rights
* Debate coverage roundup
* Question of the day
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller