Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Maybe Madigan’s moves are a positive sign after all
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Maybe Madigan’s moves are a positive sign after all

Thursday, Jan 26, 2017

* I was starting to have some second thoughts this afternoon about being so harsh on Speaker Madigan’s statement yesterday and about Deputy Majority Leader Lang’s list of ideas.

Why? Because, once I thought about it some more, I realized these announcements could be seen as “markers” set down by Madigan. It’s the stuff he may want from a final deal. In that light, it shouldn’t be seen as a bad thing. It could very well be another step in the dance that must be taken before we’ll get to a deal.

And then, when I was deciding how I should write about this topic or if I should write about it at all, an e-mail suddenly landed in my in-box…

Speaker Michael J. Madigan, D-Chicago, has requested a legislative committee take up potential cost-cutting changes to the state’s procurement process offered by Gov. Bruce Rauner.

“Governor Rauner has proposed a series of changes to the state’s procurement process that could generate savings for the state, and I believe they are worth considering,” Madigan said. “I want to work with the governor to reduce the cost of state government while maintaining transparent and ethical conduct in contracting.”

Illinois enacted procurement reforms in 2009 following the impeachment of Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The reforms created a system of checks to reduce conflicts of interest, including the use of chief procurement officers, state purchasing officers, procurement monitors, and the Procurement Policy Board.

In a letter to state Rep. Al Riley, chairman of the House State Government Administration Committee, Madigan urged members of the committee to immediately begin vetting Rauner’s proposed changes to the state procurement code, and consider the governor’s proposal to streamline the process and reduce costs. In doing so, the committee will thoroughly vet the current procurement process and determine how the Legislature could eliminate unnecessary costs while ensuring ethical conduct.

“Considering these changes is an important step in making state government run more efficiently and at a lower cost to taxpayers, but also in fostering cooperation between the governor and the Legislature,” Madigan said. “The state’s procurement process must provide adequate protections for taxpayer dollars, but we must always be open to considering ways to implement this process with reduced cost.”

Usually whenever Madigan calls for a hearing on a gubernatorial idea, he’s planning to kill it. But today’s press release and the letter he sent to the committee’s chairman (click here) don’t seem to indicate that we’re in for yet another “fair trial before the hanging.”

So, anyway, let’s see where this goes.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

5 Comments
  1. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Jan 26, 17 @ 2:28 pm:

    I think when Madigan yesterday ha do his release and limited blowback on it, I felt that there’s things afoot trying to get “somewhere” at an end game.

    This continues to feed my hope.

    First the Governor saying in a speech I’d hope he’s say…

    … now Madigan, in back to back days, looking to Process

    Process. That’s the ball game now, and if it moves this stalling, I’m all about it.


  2. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jan 26, 17 @ 3:01 pm:

    If you need a pr boost, finding ways to improve efficiencies (aka going after waste, fraud, and abuse) is an easy one. Actually making huge strides is a. It more difficult, but I’d applaud the attempt at least. Again, attacking W,F and A won’t get us to solvency, but it must be one critical element in the process. It demonstrates to taxpayers (some) politicians think integrity is important.


  3. - 47th Ward - Thursday, Jan 26, 17 @ 3:22 pm:

    A fair chunk of the procurement code deals with incentives and set-aside requirements to assist minority-owned businesses (as female-owned and those owned by disabled people). So Riley probably won’t be eager to strip those provisions.

    There is some language about project labor agreements and prevailing wage too, and while I think Rauner has this in his sights, unless Madigan is trying to pin him down, I don’t see a majority of HDems voting to make those provisions voluntary.

    Another sizable chunk of the code deals with bidding procedures designed to lower costs and prevent fraud and abuse. Good procurement managers don’t need to follow so many rules, and they are indeed a burden. But history has shown time and again that some procurement managers can’t help themselves and public money gets mis-spent or stolen.

    “Procurement reform” is easier said than done. In total, it’s a complete mess. But this monstrosity was built up piece-by-piece over time and won’t be easy to un-do.


  4. - Chicagonk - Thursday, Jan 26, 17 @ 4:02 pm:

    I’ll know that something has changed once Madigan starts talking about revenue. My hope is that this is a prelude to a serious discussion about necessary tax increases. The committee can score the proposals and when they inevitably fall way short of closing the budget gap, Madigan and Rauner can come to an agreement on how to bridge that gap with new revenue.


  5. - LessAnon? - Thursday, Jan 26, 17 @ 4:46 pm:

    A lot of procurement regulation - more specifically requirements - were put in place by the Blagojevich regime. Things that IDOT had been doing like design-build on a few projects and the limited use of project labor agreements during the previous administration were basically ended or reverse under Blago, in an effort to curry union favor wherever possible and stick it to non-union contractors. That’s all fine and good, except it increases the cost and can lower efficiency when it comes to design build. Some real savings could be found there if the Speaker will let it through. Not holding my breath, but the prospect is both unexpected and encouraging.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* State Journal-Register endorses Rauner "with reservations"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Pritzker campaign lawyer hints at defamation suit, claims campaign was never served
* Rauner says he's "trying to eradicate" the Madigan machine "cancer," but the "treatments are tough"
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Speaker Ryan to campaign for Davis *** Trump likely coming to Illinois to boost Bost
* Musical Interlude: Try (just a little bit harder)
* Tell me another fairytale, Grandpa
* Rauner again denies any delays at Quincy veterans' home
* "Speed dating" candidates
* Lawyer won't answer simple questions as some anonymous former Pritzker staffers speak out
* AFL-CIO launches "massive" digital ad buy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller