Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » AG Madigan wants expansion of hate crime law
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
AG Madigan wants expansion of hate crime law

Friday, Feb 24, 2017

* Sun-Times

Responding to what she called a spike in reports of harassment and vandalism targeting Jews, Muslims and other minorities, Attorney General Lisa Madigan is calling for legislation that would broaden Illinois hate crime laws.

Madigan on Thursday hosted a “summit” at the Thompson Center, with a panel of leaders from two dozen advocacy groups, ranging from the Jewish United Fund to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, to Lambda Legal and the National Immigrant Justice Center. The disparate groups were concerned about an increase in hostility toward Muslims, immigrants and LGBTQ people they claim has coincided with Donald Trump’s rise to the presidency.

“We just had active-shooter training at our office, because we also realize that we have to keep our people safe,” said Kim Fountain, chief operating officer of Center on Halsted, an LGBTQ rights organization. “It scared a lot of our staff, but we had to do it.”

Madigan is backing legislation that would make electronic harassment on Facebook, Twitter or other social media a prosecutable offense, and also would give her office the power to pursue civil damages for victims of hate crimes.

* The proposed new provisions are underlined and bolded

A person commits hate crime when, by reason of the actual or perceived race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or national origin of another individual or group of individuals, regardless of the existence of any other motivating factor or factors, he or she commits assault, battery, aggravated assault, intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, misdemeanor theft, criminal trespass to residence, misdemeanor criminal damage to property, criminal trespass to vehicle, criminal trespass to real property, mob action, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications as these crimes are defined in [other statutes].

* From the synopsis, it also adds this provision

Provides that independent of any criminal prosecution or the result of a criminal prosecution, any person suffering intimidation, stalking, cyberstalking, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, harassment by telephone, or harassment through electronic communications may bring a civil action for damages, injunction or other appropriate relief. Provides that the Attorney General may bring an action for civil damages for a hate crime in the name of the People of the State. Provides that the court shall impose a civil penalty of $25,000 for each violation of the hate crime statute.


- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Anon - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:35 am:

    Seems kinda vague. If I tweet at a politician telling them to f*ck off, is that a crime?

  2. - A guy - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:36 am:

    It seemed the law was pretty comprehensive before and would allow for appropriate prosecution. If this is keeping up with technology and being more precise, it’s probably a good thing. The new law though, does seem to open up to a lot more interpretation.

  3. - NoGifts - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:39 am:

    I too think it is vague. “obscene messages?” And I have felt that we already have laws to protect people from harassment. Why do we need a special case? Plus I don’t think any rapes have been prosecuted as hate crimes, and is there another crime more motivated by hate?

  4. - Anon - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:40 am:

    buzzweed: where’s your source on that?

  5. - Mama - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:40 am:

    The Attorney General is correct in adding her proposed new provisions.

    I feel schools need to explain the harassment law to their students and tell them what their rights are if they are harassed.

  6. - East Central Illinois - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:41 am:

    The phrase ” . . . any person suffering intimidation . . . ” seems very vague. People can “feel intimidated” all the time over a variety of issues. Situations that could possibly come into play would be someone disagreeing with a politician or a supporter of a politician - - sermons (some people MIGHT get offended or intimidated by a sermon). Heck . . . even on this site from time to time it could be argued that commenters get possibly get “intimidated”.

  7. - downstate commissioner - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:44 am:

    $25,000 seems a bit muvh for a facebook comment put up by some teenager. Threats and obscene messages are a long way from burning a cross or beating someone up.
    Modernizing the statute is okay, but overkill on punishments just doesn’t work….

  8. - Mama - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:45 am:

    Would the AG’s new law help the people being harassed by the federal government?

  9. - NeverPoliticallyCorrect - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:45 am:

    This is the problem with Hate Crime Laws. They try to regulate thought and speech. That’s a very slippery slope.

  10. - Anon - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:45 am:

    Apparently, transmission of obscene messages is already a crime. Who knew!

    (720 ILCS 5/26.5-1)
    Sec. 26.5-1. Transmission of obscene messages.
    (a) A person commits transmission of obscene messages when he or she sends messages or uses language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral with the intent to offend by means of or while using a telephone or telegraph facilities, equipment or wires of any person, firm or corporation engaged in the transmission of news or messages between states or within the State of Illinois.
    (b) The trier of fact may infer intent to offend from the use of language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral.

  11. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:48 am:

    A mandatory penalty of $25,000 for each alleged violation — e.g. intimidation, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, or harassment through electronic communications — if the alleged offense is merely determined to be more likely to be true than not true?

    The proposed hate crime civil action looks overly broad and ruinously severe to me.

    – MrJM

  12. - Mama - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:50 am:

    “$25,000 seems a bit muvh for a facebook comment put up by some teenager”

    I think the fee should be $5,000. The fee needs to be high enough to get the parents to stop their kids from harassing others. Teenage Facebook posts are not harmless.

  13. - Last Bull Moose - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:56 am:

    The language is too broad. I don’t like the civil penalty pile on.

    There are passages in the Christian Bible and Koran that could qualify as hate speech today. Is it now illegal to post those passages?

  14. - Roman - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:57 am:

    Buzzweed, still waiting for your source.

  15. - Anonymous - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 11:58 am:

    After she worked to prevent union employees from being paid, why not concoct a half thought out policy that likely infringes upon the 1st amanedment? Bring those favorable back up, right? A resolution to save the whales might have done an equal job without future freedom of speech lawsuits.

  16. - Saluki - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 12:02 pm:

    Political pandering.

  17. - Rich Miller - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 12:06 pm:

    Yes, Saluki, because on any post that relates at all to race, we can always count on you to chime in.

  18. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 12:06 pm:

    “CAIR, which was designated by U.S. government as terrorist linked.”


    The State Department’s list of designated terrorist organizations:

    Or, if reading isn’t your strong suit, here is video of a State Department spokesman saying Nov. 18, 2014: “The United States does not consider these U.S. organizations to be terrorist organizations,” going on to specify CAIR and Muslim American Society by name:

    And any credibility you may have had, buzzweed? Gone.

    – MrJM

  19. - Anonymous - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 12:14 pm:

    Religious affiliation and LGBTQ community include all races. It is equal opportunity political pandering.

  20. - flippy - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 12:41 pm:

    “If I tweet at a politician telling them to f*ck off, is that a crime?”

    Possibly yes if you then insert a wildy insensitive racist inflammatory slur after “f*ck off”. Maybe.

  21. - Lobo y Olla - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 1:17 pm:

    A mandatory penalty of $25,000 for each alleged violation — e.g. intimidation, disorderly conduct, transmission of obscene messages, or harassment through electronic communications — if the alleged offense is merely determined to be more likely to be true than not true?

    This is the standard for all civil cases. Nothing new.

  22. - Liberty - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 1:48 pm:

    US ally United Arab Emirates declared CAIR a terrorist organization.

  23. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 1:59 pm:

    “US ally United Arab Emirates declared CAIR a terrorist organization.”

    And the State Department of the United States of America EXPLICITLY stated, “The United States does not consider these U.S. organizations [CAIR and the Muslim American Society] to be terrorist organizations.”

    But if you would rather take your cues from the UAE instead of the USA, nobody’s gonna stop you.

    – MrJM

  24. - walker - Friday, Feb 24, 17 @ 2:08 pm:

    Politicians, per se, are not a protected class in this statute. Bringing them, and political speech, into this discussion, are red herrings.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* IEPA issues "seal order" on Sterigenics plant
* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* Rep. Chapa LaVia will head IDVA after previous appointee bows out
* Question of the day
* Mary Morrissey named new executive director of DPI
* Transparency issues
* It's just a bill
* Amazon leads $700 million investment round for Rivian
* Hysterical much?
* Minimum wage roundup
* Poll: Five points separate five mayoral candidates as union money whacks Daley
* Should the state sell the Tollway to boost the pension funds?
* Southern Illinois state's attorney vows not to enforce assault weapons ban if it becomes law
* Daley would keep hope alive for those who want pension benefit cuts
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...










Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller