Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker hit yet again on taxes
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker hit yet again on taxes

Wednesday, Apr 18, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* This tracker video is from a meet-and-greet with Pritzker supporters last Saturday in Evanston

* Transcript…

Let’s actually pass a balanced budget with a progressive income tax - you can hear what a theme of this campaign is gonna be, right?

* From Will Allison at the Rauner campaign…

JB Pritzker just admitted that raising taxes will be the theme of his campaign. It’s a clear contrast with Bruce Rauner who knows that Illinoisans are already over taxed.

The Pritzker campaign responded with a link. Click here.

They don’t appear to be too worried.

       

26 Comments
  1. - Stormfield - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 2:59 pm:

    Have to say, the link does answer a lot of questions.


  2. - NeverGonnaLetYouDown - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:01 pm:

    For a guy that can guarantee that neither Pritzker or Rauner will be getting my vote, I’ve just gotta say, well played Pritzker group. Well played.

    Just had a thought, I wonder what campaign season would look like if Redditors were running them?… Probably MUCH more enjoyable.


  3. - Perrid - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:01 pm:

    I like the response, it made me laugh. A progressive income tax isn’t necessarily a hike, though would just make future hikes easier to pass. And if the state just wanted to break even, the top earners (don’t know where the cutoff would have to be) would have a hike, but the majority would have a cut. So the rhetoric is so much hot air and a little bit of paranoia…


  4. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:02 pm:

    Excellent. Please make this the theme of the campaign. It’s popular. Of course Pritzker’s plan has to cut taxes for many, so that’s equally important. If it does, push that baby hard.

    Rauner has staked a ridiculous position. He is flat-out lying about the dangers of a progressive income tax. He is as rigid as can be about the super-rich not paying a penny more than everyone else in the state.


  5. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:03 pm:

    https://xkcd.com/1981/


  6. - PJ - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:05 pm:

    I hope Rauner’s got better than this. Hoping Illinois voters can’t understand the distinction between what JB’s actually proposing and “tax him omg!” isn’t going to bring him back from 30 points underwater, or whatever insane negatives he’s hitting. At some point he has to find a reason for people to vote *for* him instead of against his opponent.


  7. - Lt Guv - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:10 pm:

    Great response.


  8. - Anon - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:24 pm:

    The new state and local tax write off work around is not going to fly with the IRS.

    Throw a new progressive income tax on top of what will be starkly higher tax bills already next year and you will see a statewide revolt from the high earners who face potentially massive increases in their taxes with that hypothetical 1-2 punch.


  9. - Christopher - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:37 pm:

    I guess I was glad that the link was “Never Gonna Give You Up,” instead of “Together Forever.” Otherwise, I’d have been Rauner rolled.


  10. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:43 pm:

    Right now… Will Allison isn’t matching up too well to the Pritzker Crew.

    Get me the “Superstars”, then I’ll measure how close…

    The BTIA(tm)… Better Try It Again.

    Capiche?


  11. - WhoKnew - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:53 pm:

    “It’s a clear contrast with Bruce Rauner who knows that Illinoisans are clearly dis-proportionately taxed.”

    There fixed it for ya!! /s


  12. - Anon0091 - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:56 pm:

    Love it conceptually, but Rick Astley? Ugh. Can’t we leave him in the 80s where he belongs.


  13. - Rutro - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 3:57 pm:

    Hilarious, I don’t get it, but hilarious


  14. - Lucky Pierre - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 4:00 pm:

    JB is all about paying his fair share

    Since Tuesday March 20th

    Still waiting on the reinstallation of the toilets in the spare mansion, the 230 K in property tax avoided and the repatriation of the Cayman accounts

    No Plan B if he can’t get the progressive tax passed via a constitutional amendment, an extremely high bar that was not possible even for the 12 years the Democrats had control of Springfield

    Hoodwinking voters into thinking someone else will pay for all of his proposals and employers won’t react by investing less in Illinois


  15. - Redraider - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 4:06 pm:

    Bruce Rauner never has and never will be about paying his fair share, Lucky , Still waiting on how he justifies tripling his income since becoming Governor in Illinois, while so many others are hurting


  16. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 4:08 pm:

    ===No Plan B if he can’t get the progressive tax passed via a constitutional amendment, an extremely high bar that was not possible even for the 12 years the Democrats had control of Springfield===

    (Sigh)

    “Incumbent Governor Bruce Rauner has “No Plan B” as he couldn’t get any of the prevailing wage or collective bargaining diminishings passed, via property tax relief or starving social service and higher education. An extremely low bar that was not possible due in large part of Gov. Rauner’s failure to fully grasp the 60 and 30 votes needed to govern, the first and most important rule to control legislation and policy in Springfield”

    What else ya got?


  17. - Ron - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 4:38 pm:

    Reraider, remind what did JB pay in Illinois income tax in 2014?


  18. - Ron - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 4:47 pm:

    Grandson, you continue to say the same thing. Unfortunately, JB has yet to announce what these progressive rates might be.


  19. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 4:49 pm:

    ==an extremely high bar that was not possible even for the 12 years the Democrats had control of Springfield==

    Before, on a day when defending Rauner required something different than today, you claimed that Democrats during the Blago/Quinn years didn’t even try to pass a progressive income tax. Now, it’s that they couldn’t pull it off. Fascinating stuff.


  20. - Sue - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 5:16 pm:

    Reraider- fortunately you are not the Stats treasurer. If Rauner’s income tripled due to his investments- his Illinois tax bill also tripled. Rauner does not take a salary from the State. Compare to the Big Boy JB- he pays no Illinois taxes based on what was reported and scammed Cook County on his property tax bill. Other then that JB seems like a great guy to be our next Dem Governor


  21. - Silicon Prairie - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 5:33 pm:

    I am very interested in JBs plan since a couple of times a week he says his campaign pledge is to raise taxes.Not sure if you can run on that.Give me a plan


  22. - Streamwood Retiree - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 10:08 pm:

    Sue, JB didn’t scam. He’s not going to the cell next to blago. He took advantage of a loophole. You can too. I suggested it to my wife since we live so near to McDonald’s. She said,”Are you nuts? Am I going to get up in the night, dress and go to McDonald’s?” I’d certainly do it to a vacant investment property.
    Oh. And I don’t pay IL income taxes either. My income is SS and a Federal pension. Should I voluntarily pay what I legally don’t owe?


  23. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 18, 18 @ 11:36 pm:

    It’s ironic that Rauner’s policies of not having a budget and not paying the state’s bills bills will result in higher taxes which hey’ll blame on the Democrats.


  24. - Bill Baar - Thursday, Apr 19, 18 @ 7:44 am:

    JB the one Democrat who could lose against Rauner


  25. - richard523 - Thursday, Apr 19, 18 @ 9:55 am:

    How much is the income tax in California?

    Income Tax Brackets

    Married, Filing Separately

    California Taxable Income

    Rate

    $41,629 - $52,612 8.00%
    $52,612 - $268,750 9.30%
    $268,750 - $322,499 10.30%


  26. - Richard523 - Thursday, Apr 19, 18 @ 9:58 am:

    Just imagine if we pay California’s income tax rate. persons/couples who earn $52,000 will pay 8%, persons/couples who earn $ 53,000 will pay over 9 %. Residents of Illinois will go packing out of the State


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller