Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Davis tries to counter claims that he won’t defend pre-existing condition coverage
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Davis tries to counter claims that he won’t defend pre-existing condition coverage

Wednesday, Sep 19, 2018

* Press release…

Today, Rodney Davis’ campaign released a new TV ad on his work to improve health care. The ad features Rodney’s wife Shannon, a registered nurse and 19-year cancer survivor.

Davis fought to improve health care and maintain multiple layers of protections for people with pre-existing conditions in the American Health Care Act (AHCA). He voted to lower costs and increase access to group and employer-sponsored health insurance. The health care changes in the AHCA are modeled after changes made by the State of Maine, which lowered premium costs for Americans aged 60 by more than $7,000.

Recent ads by an outside group supporting Davis’ opponent make claims fact checkers have considered misleading and fail to tell the whole story. The Washington Post and explain.

Under Obamacare, premiums have risen by 108 percent since 2013 and every county in the 13th District is down to one or two insurance providers. Whether you’re healthy, young, old, or have a pre-existing condition, people are seeing increased costs and fewer choices under the current system.

* The ad

* Transcript…

The attacks on Rodney are just ridiculous I’m someone with a pre-existing condition, and will have that for the rest of my life. The genetic form of cancer that I have can affect our children. They have that chance to have the same type of cancer that I do.

Rodney, his ultimate goal is just to make sure everybody has the health care that they want and the choices and the options that they choose. Rodney’s willing to work across party lines to fight for better health care for all of us. It’s personal for us.

* Londrigan campaign…

Today, Betsy Dirksen Londrigan responded to Congressman Rodney Davis supposedly “reaffirming” his support for protections for those with pre-existing conditions, through a non-binding resolution without any legal weight. In reality, Davis voted 11 times to repeal the ACA without a replacement – which would eliminate protections for those with pre-existing conditions – and voted for the AHCA, which the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, independent fact checkers, and the AARP have all said would have weakened protections for those with pre-existing conditions including by making their coverage unaffordable.

“Honestly, it’s stunning that my opponent has the audacity to tout a worthless, partisan resolution claiming that he supports the very same protections for folks with pre-existing conditions that he has voted to gut over and over again,” said Betsy Dirksen Londrigan, candidate for Illinois’ 13th Congressional District. “This resolution protects exactly zero of the 290,800 non-elderly people in our district with pre-existing conditions – including all three of my children, and my husband Tom – and only a career politician like Rodney Davis would pretend that it does. For all who faced losing protections they counted on or being unable to afford their coverage altogether, this cheap talk is offensive. His actions speak clearly, and this resolution is nothing but more Washington political maneuvering.”

Check the facts:

    * Davis Voted For Republican Budget That Repealed Affordable Care Act. [H Con Res 25, Vote #88, 3/21/13]
    * Davis Voted To Repeal The Affordable Care Act. [HR 45, Vote #154, 5/16/13; CQ Floor Votes, 5/16/13]
    * Davis Voted For Republican Budget That Repealed Affordable Care Act. [H Con Res 96, Vote #177, 4/10/14]
    * Davis Voted To Repeal Affordable Care Act. [HR 596, Vote #58, 2/3/15; CQ Floor Votes, 2/3/15]
    * Davis Voted For Budget Alternative That Repealed The Affordable Care Act. [H. Con Res. 27, Vote #141, 3/25/15; US News and World Report,3/25/15]
    * Davis Voted For Republican Budget That Repealed The Affordable Care Act. [H. Con Res. 27, Vote #142, 3/25/15; New York Times, 3/25/15]
    * Davis Voted For Republican Conference Report On Budget That Began Process To Repeal Affordable Care Act. [S Con Res 11, Vote #183, 4/30/15; Bloomberg, 4/29/15]
    * Davis Voted To Repeal Major Pillars Of Affordable Care Act, Including Individual Mandate. [HR 3762, Vote #568, 10/23/15; Los Angeles Times, 10/23/15]
    * Davis Voted To Repeal The Affordable Care Act. [HR 3762, Vote #6, 1/6/16; CNN, 1/6/16]
    * Davis Voted To Overturn Obama’s Veto Of Bill That Would Repeal The Affordable Care Act. [HR 3762, Vote #53, 2/2/16; Washington Post,2/2/16] Note: Reported as 63rd vote
    * Davis Voted To Begin Process Of Repealing Affordable Care Act. [S Con Res 3, Vote #58, 1/13/17; CNN, 1/3/17]

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Pundent - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 12:43 pm:

    You can’t favor coverage for preexisting conditions without supporting the individual mandate. Anyone claiming otherwise is being dishonest.

  2. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 12:53 pm:

    You can’t vote for bills that eliminate the pre-existing condition protections and then say you aren’t in favor of eliminating those protections.

  3. - TooManyJens - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 12:56 pm:

    The first paragraph of Londrigan’s press release sums up the situation very well. It would appear that Davis agrees in part, since the FactCheck article linked by his campaign outlines the ways in which the AHCA would have weakened protections for people with pre-existing conditions.

  4. - WSJ Paywall - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 12:58 pm:

    If you’re explaining you’re losing.

  5. - Norseman - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 12:59 pm:

    === You can’t favor coverage for preexisting conditions without supporting the individual mandate. Anyone claiming otherwise is being dishonest. ===

    Obviously Davis is playing the GOP two-step fib. But your statement should be modified to reflect that only supporting the coverage of preexisting conditions without a funding mechanism as represented by the individual mandate would lead to higher costs. Dems wanted to fix Obamacare to address cost issues. GOP wants to open it to bring back happy times for insurers and businesses.

  6. - Lego - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 1:01 pm:

    Better spot than any Londrigan one produced yet.

  7. - Generic Drone - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 1:26 pm:

    Davis also supported taking more money from Social Security to use in other areas of spending. Keep that in mind while voting.

  8. - lollinois - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 1:27 pm:

    This is Rodney Davis in a nutshell.He takes partisan stances in all his statements and votes but then claims he is willing to reach across the aisle. He says he wants to protect pre-existing conditions right up until he votes not to do that.

    “Believe what I say, not what I do”.

  9. - Colin O'Scopy - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 1:28 pm:

    =Better spot than any Londrigan one produced yet.=

    If what you say is true, then why is Rodney defending himself? It’s easy for the wife (or husband) of a sitting member of Congress, with that Bentley health care program, to say they have a pre-existing condition. But in reality, she will never “wont” for a better plan.

    If Rodney is such a champion for health care, why doesn’t he roll up his sleeves and push for it?

  10. - siualum - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 2:01 pm:

    Rodney should work to ensure we have access to the same health insurance he gets as a US rep. At the same cost.

  11. - Disappointed - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 2:44 pm:

    Davis plays the nice guy back in his district.
    In DC he’s just as hostile to the middle class as any of the other scoundrels and fools in the GOP house.

  12. - Al - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 2:57 pm:

    There are a trillion reasons to vote against Davis. He favors and votes for literally Trillion dollar out of balance budgets.

  13. - knownothing - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 3:34 pm:

    Davis’ entire re-election strategy is literally “Don’t judge me by what I’ve done, judge me by the things I say”

  14. - Mr. Smith - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 4:14 pm:

    Rep. Davis only represents those folks who agree with him. He refuses to meet with his constituents unless he is guaranteed friendly ground and crowd support. He looks and sounds like Mr. Nice Guy, until he gets back to DC. Then it is entirely another story.

    He REALLY needs to be sent packing in November.

  15. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Sep 19, 18 @ 10:00 pm:

    Dude, you voted multiple times to repeal the law that protected those with pre-existing conditions, without any replacement.

    Just nasty, swamp monster, in the tank for Big Insurance.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Tribune: FBI raids Kevin Quinn's house
* Question of the day
* How the expungement/pardon process will work
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Reformer criticizes Pritzker for not using tax money to fly to public events
* Our sorry state
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Fun with numbers
* What's next for cannabis?
* President Preckwinkle wants another term
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...





Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller