Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Public Interest Legal Foundation sues Illinois over access to voter registration files
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Public Interest Legal Foundation sues Illinois over access to voter registration files

Tuesday, Jul 28, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Background

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is an American conservative legal group based in Indianapolis, Indiana,which is known for suing states and local governments to purge voters from election rolls. The group has made false claims about the extent of voter fraud in the United States. The organization has published the information of eligible voters online, including Social Security numbers, falsely accusing them of being fraudulent voters.

The nonprofit was constituted in 2012 to “assist states and others” to fight “lawlessness” in American elections. They assert that “large numbers of ineligible aliens are registering to vote and casting ballots”, although lists that they have displayed of such supposed voters prove to actually include American natives who are eligible voters. PILF said their lists had been based on state government lists of declared “non-citizens” removed from local voter rolls. Some U.S. citizens were wrongfully purged in the process.

* Press release

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) filed a lawsuit today against the Illinois State Board of Elections for failing to disclose voter registration records under federal law (Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Sandvoss et. al).

“Federal law requires transparency in election records,” PILF President and General Counsel J. Christian Adams said. “Just because someone isn’t engaging in partisan electioneering should not prevent them from ensuring that Illinois’ voter rolls are in order. Illinois’ records must be made available to the public, not just politicians.”

The complaint, filed July 27, explains the Foundation initially requested access to Illinois’ federally required statewide voter file and voting histories on October 16, 2019. On February 21 and after a failed inspection of records, the Foundation provided notice that litigation would commence if voter registration data was not provided as required under federal law.

The Foundation seeks relief under Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which requires officials to make voter list maintenance documents like the voter roll itself available for inspection to the general public. The law also offers a private right to file a lawsuit if denied.

Other federal courts which have confronted the issue have sided in favor of disclosure of public records.

The Foundation is pursuing litigation against Maine and Maryland for similar inspection rights violations. Delaware and Massachusetts opened access to their respective registration records pursuant to PILF’s federal inspection requests.

The Foundation accesses public voter registration database extracts to perform audits for deceased, duplicated, and otherwise outdated/corrupted records. Findings can result in federal list maintenance lawsuits to correct flagged registrant files. Lawsuits against Detroit and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, recently wrapped along those lines.

The Foundation has also shared data via court briefs involving changes to mail ballot rules and procedures that have arisen due to the COVID-19 pandemic across 11 cases in California, Connecticut, Georgia, North Carolina, New Mexico, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

The new case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The case number is 3:20-cv-03190. The attorney for the Public Interest Legal Foundation is Sue Becker. Chicago-based Christine Svenson serves as local counsel.

* From the lawsuit

Section 10 ILCS 5/1A-25(4) restricts those allowed to receive a copy of the voter registration list to just two types of entities: political committees or government entities (“Restricted Access Law”). No other entity or individual is allowed to receive a copy of the voter registration list under the Restricted Access Law.

The Restricted Access Law contains just one exception, which is that a person may view the voter registration list at the office of the State Board of Elections […]

[Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993] provides, in relevant part, “Each State shall maintain for at least 2 years and shall make available for public inspection and, where available, photocopying at a reasonable cost, all records concerning the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible voters”

So, it appears they have a decent case here. We’ll see. I’d hate to pay that copying bill, though.

* Also, you may remember attorney Christine Svenson

She is active in the local Republican party and has served as the Cook County Republican Party’s general counsel. […]

Svenson represented a client who sued Dan Rutherford, a 2014 candidate for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, for alleged sexual harassment. Rutherford accused Svenson and her client of fabricating the allegations to help his opponent, now Governor Bruce Rauner. Svenson denied any political motivations. She had previously received $3,500 from the Rauner campaign, but said it was for legal work reviewing a lease for Rauner.

The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice.


  1. - @misterjayem - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 11:36 am:

    “So, it appears they have a decent case here.”

    Serious question: Who’s the “they” in this sentence, Rich?

    – MrJM

  2. - Ron - In Texas - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 11:39 am:

    Looks like that foundation has federal law on their side.

  3. - DuPage Saint - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 11:45 am:

    I read it that list should be available. I believe government bodies should follow law and resent it when it they try to avoid or delay. Does not matter if group seeking info is shady, your opponent or just a kook law applies for everyone

  4. - twowaystreet - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 11:51 am:

    I am guessing the state will argue that since you can view the list that they are open to public inspection. Not sure if that is a great argument.

    IL one of only a few states where non-political groups cannot get their hands on the list. Another example of IL political parties trying to hold too much control and now it is biting them in the rear. They should have opened it more, while putting the proper restrictions in place so groups like this cannot have free rein with voter’s information. This could go very bad for IL voters.

  5. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 11:56 am:

    === The organization has published the information of eligible voters online, including Social Security numbers, falsely accusing them of being fraudulent voters.===
    Slandering people, abetting identity thieves, how has PILF escaped bring sued into the Stone Age?

  6. - Cheryl44 - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 12:18 pm:

    I hope this ends up purging RWNJ voters.

  7. - Hadley - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 12:46 pm:

    It appears to be a false claim that they published social security numbers accusing them of being fraudulent voters. That is a false claim.

  8. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 2:15 pm:

    ===That is a false claim.===
    Apparently PILF removed them after being sued.

  9. - 40,000 ft - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 2:44 pm:

    Why would IL State Board of Elections deny this?

    Of course they are doing a fabulous job maintaining the voter rolls.

    It seems like it would be an easy decision with lots of good PR and political good will.

    (btw, who pays to defend the Board of Elections when they don’t want to comply with federal law?)

  10. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jul 28, 20 @ 3:21 pm:

    Give them the list. Then, when they stomp their feet and make their wild claims about voter fraud and wanting to purge voter rolls, ignore them.

    This organization has one purpose and one purpose only and that is to ensure that as few people as possible can vote. They have no interest in democracy. Their only interest is in their hyper-partisan agenda.

  11. - PILF, seriously? - Wednesday, Jul 29, 20 @ 12:45 am:

    What an unfortunate acronym. I thought PILF meant “Person I’d Like to Fool around with” or some such.

  12. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Wednesday, Jul 29, 20 @ 9:55 am:

    PILF, as in pilfer these social security numbers please.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* It’s just a bill
* Meanwhile, in Opposite Land…
* *** UPDATED x1 *** FBI agent confirms that feds have been probing Madigan since at least 2014
* That toddlin' town roundup
* Let's see if we can get this cemetery cleaned up
* A look ahead
* Today's quotable
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* Some possible holes in the defense
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* *** ComEd 4 trial live coverage ***
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller