Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Former Rep. Scott Drury wins court round against Dan Proft
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Former Rep. Scott Drury wins court round against Dan Proft

Thursday, Aug 4, 2022 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Celeste Bott at Law360

An Illinois appellate panel has revived a defamation suit filed by Loevy & Loevy attorney and former Illinois Rep. Scott Drury against a conservative radio host and political action committee, finding a lower court erred in granting the defendants summary judgment before resolving a discovery dispute.

Reversing a summary judgment win for the Liberty Principles PAC and Dan Proft, a Chicago radio host and former Republican candidate for Illinois governor, the appellate court said on Tuesday that a Cook County judge abused their discretion when they resolved the case before ruling on Drury’s motion to compel discovery, saying the defendants have conceded that some of the discovery sought in that request was relevant to the issue of actual malice, a central issue of the summary judgment motion.

* This lawsuit has been around for years. From the appellate opinion

On October 9, 2014, the trial court issued an order that stayed discovery in this matter until further order of the court. On February 26, 2018, plaintiff filed the second amended complaint at issue. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that defendants1 made allegedly defamatory statements in a cable television advertisement and a campaign advertisement sent by United States mail. The statements in the cable television advertisement about which plaintiff complained were:

    “Scott Drury wants to cut funding for our local schools by as much as seventy per cent. Incumbent State Representative Scott Drury has put his Chicago Democrat Party’s bosses ahead of our schools. Drury’s plan would cut state funding for our schools by more than $6.9 million. Drury’s plan would send our tax dollars to Chicago schools. Scott Drury made the choice to serve Illinois’ political ruling class at the expense of our schools. On November 4, you have a choice. Bring balance back to state government by voting no on Scott Drury.”

Plaintiff’s complaint further alleges that on or about October 4, 2014, defendants caused to be published to voters a mail campaign advertisement containing the following statements:

    “Scott Drury supports defunding our schools so that party bosses will fund his campaign,”
    “Incumbent State Rep. Scott Drury is doing the bidding of Illinois’ Political Ruling Class at the Expense of our Local Schools,”
    “Scott Drury has made the choice to serve Illinois’ Political Ruling Class at the expense of our schools,”

and that Drury had a plan to cut approximately $7 million from local schools.

On April 3, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion to vacate the stay of discovery. On April 25, 2019, the trial court issued an order finding that defendants did not oppose plaintiff’s motion, granting plaintiff’s motion to vacate the stay of discovery, and ordering that all written discovery was to be completed on or before July 29, 2019. […]

Plaintiff’s affidavit averred, in part, that defendants’ failure to produce documents in response to plaintiff’s discovery requests had prejudiced plaintiff’s ability to conduct discovery and made his ability to conduct depositions less effective. Plaintiff averred that defendant Proft was a defendant in the litigation, was a hostile witness, and that plaintiff could not speak to Proft directly. Plaintiff also averred, in part, that if sworn defendant Proft would testify that “[p]rior to publishing the Defamatory Statements he [(Proft)] did not make an inquiry to ascertain whether it was his inference that [plaintiff] supported Senate Bill 16 (the bill associated with the conduct described in the allegedly defamatory statements), and did so for corrupt reasons, rather than another one that was the correct inference to draw,” “[p]rior to publishing the Defamatory Statements, he failed to make inquiry to ascertain whether the inference he drew that [plaintiff] supported Senate Bill 16, and did so for corrupt reasons, was correct where there were other inferences that may have been drawn from the same events,” and “[p]rior to publishing the Defamatory Statements, he did not inquire into whether: (i) [plaintiff] was a Democrat because his values more closely aligned with those of the Democratic Party than other parties; (ii) INCS Action PAC supported [plaintiff] because he was an incumbent legislator who supported charter schools; or (iii) [plaintiff] did not co-sponsor House Resolution 1276 (attacking Senate Bill 16) because he was unaware of it, he rarely co-sponsored House Resolutions, and House Resolution 1276 was introduced when the House of Representatives was not in session and was not assigned to committee. […]

We find the trial court abused its discretion by ruling on defendants’ motion for summary judgment before ruling on plaintiff’s motion to compel [discovery]; therefore, we have no need to reach plaintiff’s remaining arguments. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s judgment ruling that it could “proceed to hear the Motion for Summary Judgment before resolving the Motion to Compel,” reverse the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of defendants as premature, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this order.


  1. - AlfondoGonz - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 1:50 pm:

    “Former Rep Scott Drury”?

    This headline simply must be mistaken. My understanding is his title is “Former
    Federal Prosecutor Scott Drury.”


  2. - NotRich - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 1:57 pm:

    I forgot about this arrogance v arrogance case.

  3. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 2:10 pm:

    Maybe Proft should have Drury on his radio program and they can hash it out for the dozens of Proft listeners.

    That would be compelling radio.

  4. - Amalia - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 2:11 pm:

    Drury is arrogant but Proft is dangerous, so good on this.

  5. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 2:13 pm:

    Advice for Proft: you can probably settle this thing for the price of a good clock.

  6. - New Day - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 2:13 pm:

    Who to root for in this drama…oh who to root for?

  7. - Long time Independent - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 2:18 pm:

    Eventually someone sooner then later Is going to prevail on one of these law suits and get a big pay day. When they do we all will be better off because the line has been crossed so many times by candidates on both side of the isle. This last primary was maybe one of the worst I’ve ever seen and it needs to be called out and stopped.

  8. - walker - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 2:27 pm:

    Isn’t Dan the “Follow the Rules” guy? Maybe he’ll use this as an opportunity to ask for donations to his PAC, implying it’s for his defense fund. He’s a proven fund raiser lol

  9. - Fan - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 2:29 pm:

    Wow. Maybe a few decades if candidates should sue Cosgrove over the lies he has told.

  10. - Just Sayin - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 3:04 pm:

    ==(i) [plaintiff] was a Democrat because his values more closely aligned with those of the Democratic Party than other parties; ==

    Except when it came to his support of Rauner alongside Franks and Dunkin during the budget impasse.

  11. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Thursday, Aug 4, 22 @ 3:09 pm:

    It seems more like a civil procedure ruling than a ruling on defamation law. No summary judgment before discovery is finish. Still, if those statements are defamation, there are a lot of defamers out there.

  12. - Huh? - Friday, Aug 5, 22 @ 9:09 am:

    Slinging mud during a political campaign is defamation?

    Where is the political poofery defense?

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Isabel’s afternoon briefing
* Beyond the horse race
* Cannabis baron ridicules equity programs: "We’re going to give these assets to felons and people that have two heads and all this kind of stuff"
* IEPA says it won't do anything about polluting refineries
* Pritzker stands behind his messaging, claims support for candidates
* A quick Illinois history lesson
* Vallas gets out in front of attacks
* Following the money
* A massive failure
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Laurence Msall
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller