Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Why did ACLU Illinois staffers picket the organization this week?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Why did ACLU Illinois staffers picket the organization this week?

Friday, Aug 30, 2024 - Posted by Isabel Miller

* In These Times back in 2021

A union fight that is playing out in Illinois highlights how progressive organizations can use technical objections to the scope of a proposed union to effectively pursue union-busting while maintaining plausible deniability that they are doing so. This effort to have it both ways makes sense when you consider where this labor battle is happening: at the ACLU.

The past two years has been a landmark one for unionization at the ACLU, part of the broader, ongoing wave of nonprofit organizing. As the pandemic raged in 2020, workers at several ACLU state branches unionized–including in Kansas, where the staff faced a corporate-style anti-union campaign. In January of 2021 about 300 staffers nationwide formed the civil liberties group’s largest staff union, called ACLU Staff United. In subsequent months, more state ACLU staffs across the country have successfully unionized, and ACLU staff union drives are underway in other states, like Virginia and Illinois*. Workers have vowed to continue until they have successfully unionized every state office. 

Though common sense might tell you that an organization that proudly declares that it “has championed the right of workers to organize unions since its inception more than 90 years ago” would be an easy place to unionize, that has not been completely true. While most of the union drives at the ACLU have secured voluntary recognition from management — a necessary baseline for any employer to be considered pro-union — that has not been the case in Illinois. In late June, workers there asked management to recognize their staff union, part of the National Organization of Legal Services Workers. More than five months later, they are still waiting.  […]

For months now, management and the union have been locked in a stalemate over the issue of how many workers will be allowed to be members of the unit. Restricting the size of a proposed unit is a common tactic by employers, who often seek to assert that as many employees as possible are managers or supervisors, and are therefore not eligible to be union members. These sorts of negotiations, though cloaked in legalistic language, are usually more about power than about law — how fiercely management chooses to argue over vague job descriptions comes down to whether they are comfortable working with a staff union, or whether they see it as a priority to make the union as small and weak as possible from the very beginning. 

Fed up with the delays, the ACLU of IL Staff United finally filed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board in early October, seeking a resolution. The union had a two-day hearing at the NLRB that concluded on November 1. Though the timeline is not certain, the union expects to get a ruling on the size of its unit soon, and then it can proceed to a formal vote for certification.

* The National Labor Relations Board ruled in favor of the union’s right to hold an election in December of 2021

[T]he Employer provided only broad assertions to support its claims, and has thus failed to meet its burden to prove that the disputed classifications should be excluded because they are supervisory, managerial, or confidential in nature. Accordingly, I am directing a self-determination election among the petitioned-for appropriate unit of employees, including permitting the professional employees in the unit to first determine whether or not they wish to be included in the same unit with the nonprofessional employees, as set forth below.

* The union claims they have not received raises since 2021


* Yesterday, the union picketed to demand a contract

* More…

       

9 Comments
  1. - Norseman - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 11:28 am:

    Unlike legislative/campaign unions, I’m open to learning from the folks about this. I just wonder whether unionizing an organization dependent upon donations is problematic. Is the revenue stream for the ACLU stable?


  2. - Pot calling kettle - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 11:54 am:

    This should not be problematic as evidenced by other state ACLUs recognizing bargaining units.


  3. - 990 - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 12:00 pm:

    If you check out their 990, the Illinois branch has an insane executive compensation (they paid two legal directors over half a million dollars in the same year!). These are some of the smartest lawyers and advocates in our state, many of whom work long hours and on weekends, and the least the ACLU can do is give them the respect and compensation they deserve.


  4. - Isn’t Union in their name? - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 12:04 pm:

    People should check out their 990. Executive compensation is eye popping for an org reliant on donations…


  5. - charles in charge - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 12:06 pm:

    ==Is the revenue stream for the ACLU stable?==

    In short, yes.

    https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/362682569


  6. - Curious - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 12:19 pm:

    Wonder how much this donation-based organization is paying in lawyers fees to fight all this? Doesn’t seem good stewardship of donor funds not to mention a good look to the public.


  7. - Norseman - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 12:20 pm:

    Thanks charles in charge. Good luck to the union organizers.


  8. - 990s - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 1:08 pm:

    It’s obvious who leadership values most - themselves. According to the 990s, through FY2013-FY2018, the percentage of total functional expenses going to executive compensation averaged 6.2%. It has BALLOONED since then to 41.6% in FY2023. Across 45 ACLU affiliates’ publicly available 990s (excluding National), ACLU-IL’s expenses toward executive compensation were the HIGHEST in FY2022 at almost $2,245,505 (about 40% of total functional expenses), over $1.4 MILLION MORE than the ACLU office with the next highest executive compensation. The next highest ACLU office was ACLU-WA Found, with executive compensation at $822,797 (but only constituting about 9% of their total functional expenses). The average of expenses towards executive compensation across 44 affiliates (excluding National and ACLU-IL), was only $158,500, not even half of ACLU-IL Executive Director Colleen Connell’s average annual salary over the past ten years (she’s raked in over 3.6 MILLION since FY2013). Given the top-heaviness and self-importance their spending illustrates, it makes sad sense they’re nickel-and-diming the staff doing the actual work. SHAME ON THEM!


  9. - Bob - Friday, Aug 30, 24 @ 1:24 pm:

    I already halted my ACLU donations when they helped the NRA in New York. Wish I hadn’t just so I could use this as the reason.


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Roundup: Testimony focuses on ex-aides loyalty to Madigan
* Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders
* Some not-great state flag redesign contest feedback from WGN
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker: Gia Biagi signals a “new era” at IDOT
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller