Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here. To inquire about advertising on CapitolFax.com, click here.
Question of the day

Wednesday, Jul 1, 2026 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Should the state lift its ban on the purchase and use of fireworks? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.


       

57 Comments
  1. - JS Mill - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:37 pm:

    In my life of more than 50 years the ban has never been effective. Now you can buy fireworks at popup stands all over the place so what is the point? It would also take business away from Indiana. Fun benefit.


  2. - Keyrock - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:41 pm:

    I voted no. My aunt received serious leg injuries from kids throwing fireworks.

    The ban certainly doesn’t eliminate fireworks, but keeping fireworks illegal does reduce the number of injuries.


  3. - Save Ferris - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:41 pm:

    I like not worrying if my roof is going to go up in flames due to a teen neighbor’s roman candles.


  4. - Dance Band on the Titanic - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:43 pm:

    Not unless you believe that having 10 fingers leaves plenty to spare.


  5. - Apple - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:45 pm:

    Gosh yes. Remove the ban, regulate and tax. People are getting them anyway. Just please no social equity initiatives that fail miserably and drag on for years and years like they did with pot. Do it right or don’t bother.


  6. - Candy Dogood - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:47 pm:

    There’s a reason why we have these laws in place and it wasn’t because prior elected leaders hated fun and weren’t patriotic.

    Letting anyone purchase and store explosive and incendiary devices is not great public policy and let’s not pretend like we’ll only have responsible use when we don’t have that now.


  7. - Diane - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:47 pm:

    As much as it doesn’t discourage my neighbors from setting off fireworks every night for the entire week surrounding holidays, I certainly don’t want more people doing it.


  8. - Big Dipper - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:49 pm:

    Seeing as people have no self control and set them off at 2 and 3 a.m. I voted no.


  9. - Jack in Chatham - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:50 pm:

    No, keep the ban. The neighbors illegal fireworks scare my dogs and wake up the neighbors children. It is a noise nuisance.


  10. - btowntruth from forgottonia - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:55 pm:

    No.
    Big Dipper beat me to it.


  11. - Streator Curmudgeon - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:57 pm:

    Voted no.

    Gambling was “bad,” until we could tax it.

    Marijuana was “bad,” until we could tax it.

    Fireworks are still bad, and like the other two, if we tax them, they’ll still be bad. I doubt there will ever be a Fireworks Anonymous, but as Keyrock says above, keeping them illegal will reduce the number of injuries.

    I’m called the Curmudgeon because I think it’s kind of dumb to exchange your money for loud, annoying noises.


  12. - Sox Fan - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 1:59 pm:

    Similar to gambling restrictions, it may be time to acknowledge that firework restrictions do not effectively act as a deterrent. Might as well take the added revenue (I’ll admit I have no idea how much additional revenue is actually at issue)


  13. - Bears Fan - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:01 pm:

    I voted yes to remove the state ban but municipalities should be able to ban the sale and/or use of fireworks if they want to


  14. - Anyone Remember - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:05 pm:

    No. In addition to the injury concerns noted above, grew up in several “water poor” states where fires are a real concern. With climate change, droughts are more likely, increasing fire risk.


  15. - Candy Dogood - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:05 pm:

    Some of y’all are acting like the public policy problem is people using fireworks when they’re not supposed to and not the damage caused by forest fires and structure fires. Never mind the additional injuries to folks who misuse them or their victims.


  16. - Hmmmm - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:07 pm:

    No. SO sick of the fireworks and guns pouring over the border from Indiana.


  17. - Leslie K - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:08 pm:

    I voted no. I don’t think the ban is particularly effective, but eliminating it might signal to some that fireworks are safe. I know my reasoning is probably a bit lame on this.


  18. - Norseman - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:08 pm:

    Never cared for the ban until I moved to redneck land. We have to put up with fireworks for weeks. Of course, they’re not worried about others sleep.


  19. - DuPage Saint - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:08 pm:

    I voted no. And I would vote a big yes to enforcing the law
    Yes I am a grumpy old man but I did not like them when I was a kid


  20. - ChicagoVinny - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:14 pm:

    I voted no. It’s too easy to accidentally start structure and brush fires from fireworks.


  21. - Stix Hix - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:16 pm:

    Voted No.

    Chapin Rose needs the fireworks sale ban so he can continue to be outraged about it.


  22. - Louis G Atsaves - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:20 pm:

    Voted yes. I have spent holidays involving fireworks (like the 4th) in other states over the years. It’s basically legal everywhere else in other states. The difference between folks shooting fireworks from their backyards in other states and folks shooting fireworks near my backyard in this state is absolutely zero. So what have we banned here? Nothing.


  23. - Cyclone89 - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:20 pm:

    I voted no, but i would like to see police departments enforcing the ban. Instead many just post “dont call us for fireworks” type messages on social media.


  24. - Rahm's Parking Meter - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:22 pm:

    Get rid of the ban - lost tax revenue to WI and IN and no one enforces it.


  25. - Steve M - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:23 pm:

    I voted no as I find the amount of illegal activity going on all summer long in our area to be bad enough as it is. I’d love to see greater enforcement of the illegality


  26. - Lurker - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:34 pm:

    Not only did I vote no but I’d like to see serious enforcement. The negatives are just too much compared to the positives.


  27. - Amalia - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:38 pm:

    No.not that police enforce it…I know of one neighborhood with a fireworks display put on and most of the people running it are cops….but fire on my roof scares me. also ever talk to er personnel about the 4th of july? it’s not just a season of The Pitt. er personnel HATE the holiday because there’s lots of idiotic behavior with fireworks. keep the ban.


  28. - JS Mill - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:38 pm:

    =Some of y’all are acting like the public policy problem=

    You can already purchase some fireworks legally in Illinois.


  29. - Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:44 pm:

    Yes. Then again,

    1) I live in a very rural area

    2) I can drive 30-40 minutes to Cape Girardeau or Charleston Missouri and buy whatever I want. So, in effect, there is no ban down here.


  30. - Senator Clay Davis - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:50 pm:

    ::. Just please no social equity initiatives that fail miserably and drag on for years and years like they did with pot::

    Haha, this is exactly something Illinois would do. Then lawmakers would spend a month touting it in the media. It would take the Department three years to finalize rules and run the RFP. 60% of the eventual winners would essentialy be fronts for national fireworks conglomerates. “Krazy Kaplan’s Equitable Labor Fireworks for All” would dominate the market, which would cost 30% more than Indiana.


  31. - Kevie Kev - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 2:58 pm:

    =Get rid of the ban - lost tax revenue to WI and IN and no one enforces it.=

    This. Everybody around here goes down 55 to St Louis and stocks up…. I dont understand the “no” votes who then follow up with basically “everybody is doing it”. Ok. so you’re saying the ban is pointless.


  32. - Red Line Rambler - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:02 pm:

    Shoutout to the firework industry’s lobbying team. Former Deputy Minority Leader Matt Muphy has been putting tireless hours into this on behalf of his client! If he can’t do it, no one can!


  33. - Murph - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:04 pm:

    Just legalize ground-based sparklers. Sensible middle ground.


  34. - Think Again - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:09 pm:

    The firework ban is just about as effective as the law that required semi-auto rifle owners to voluntarily self-register with the ISP - lift it.


  35. - Concerned transplant - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:22 pm:

    I moved here from Iowa. In Iowa they were banned until a few years ago. One side effect when living in suburban areas, it is impossible to distinguish between gunshots and fireworks. There was a person who was shot and no body reported it because the sound was presumed fireworks. Not to mention the constant trauma that explosions cause to animals and Veterans. And the nuisance to citizens and property damage. Imagine spent glowing hot explosive by-product raining on your house or vehicle. We know there are people who will not use responsibly. I was so glad to be leaving all that in Iowa when I moved here.


  36. - Mike Sorensen - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:23 pm:

    Over here in Quincy, we also cover Hannibal, MO. Last year, the city council in Hannibal lifted its ban on fireworks within the city limits (since they’re legal in MO) specifically for the 4th of July weekend.

    In the previous five years leading up to the change, the fire department there had a total of 7 fireworks-related calls.

    In the 3-day period fireworks were allowed last year (July 3-5), the fire department has five calls for fireworks-related fires, including a two-story residence that was destroyed.

    They changed the city ordinance back to a full ban inside the city limits the following week.

    Take it for what you will, mileage may vary.


  37. - Peters Piece - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:28 pm:

    This past Independence Day a neighbor shot a firework into a window of another neighbor. Lots of fire and smoke damage. She has still not been able to return to her home. No never.


  38. - Concerned transplant - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:28 pm:

    To those arguing that laws aren’t enforced. I moved here from Des Moines Iowa. After living in Springfield for over a year now I can count on one hand the number of times I have heard fireworks since moving. In Des Moines it was a daily occurrence throughout the summer. Removing the law would create problems gauranteed.


  39. - NIU Grad - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:31 pm:

    Torn about this, but at the end of the day: just because Wisconsin and Indiana allows something, doesn’t mean we should. While I wish we could capture that revenue, if we truly do believe these are unsafe items for the general public we should maintain the ban.

    That being said…seeing that this is a straight 50/50 debate, this would be an excellent “keep them distracted” debate for a future General Assembly after the nonstop Bears conversations end.


  40. - Proud Papa Bear - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:47 pm:

    No
    I’m generally a “as long as it doesn’t affect me, do want you want” guy.
    This does affect me. I have enough trouble sleeping as it is.


  41. - James of Little Italy - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 3:55 pm:

    I voted “no”. I don’t have a strong opinion for a change.


  42. - Vote Quimby - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 4:04 pm:

    Voted yes. Same justification as cannabis… those who want to do it find a way regardless of any “ban,” it’s mostly safe with proper restrictions, and it will generate more revenue for the state.


  43. - reelpro - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 4:45 pm:

    What ban? I have lived in Illinois for over 74 years. Every year my town smells like a war zone. Fireworks have been going off half the night for over a week.


  44. - Dotnonymous x - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 5:07 pm:

    My neighbors put on a fireworks show that rivals a professional gig…we sit in our front yard until we can’t stand the gun powder smoke…they must spend thousands of dollars on fireworks?


  45. - stateandlake - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 5:37 pm:

    The local fireworks show around the Fourth of July scares the crap out of my dog. I startle easily as a result of past trauma. Imagine the effect on veterans dealing with PTSD. For these reasons I say keep the ban, and work with local law enforcement to minimize the use of fireworks under local ordinances.


  46. - Negatory - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 6:09 pm:

    Voted “No.”

    My vote was influenced by seeing a man with two missing fingers caused by mishandling fireworks as a youth.


  47. - Daisy - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 6:10 pm:

    The border states which sell fireworks also rank t in the top 5 nationally for fireworks injuries. The majority of amateur fireworks come in from overseas and don’t meet CPSC standards and are basically defective products which leads to them malfunctioning so much. There were 13,000 injuries last year and 15 fatalities (including 3 in IL). Unlike a sprained ankle, fireworks injuries are often catastrophic and result in dismemberments and years of skin grafting and scars, which the victim and their loved ones have to suffer through the rest of lives. There are over 100 professional pyrotechnic shows in the Chicagoland area this weekend that families can enjoy instead of spending it in the E.R. Keep them illegal!


  48. - BOOM-BOOM - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 6:24 pm:

    The ‘rockets’ red glare’ has symbolized American freedom since 1931. Responsible, legal amateur fireworks allow families to celebrate that tradition safely and proudly. If not dial 911.


  49. - In_The_Middle - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 7:01 pm:

    No. Because some people won’t have all 10 fingers after this weekend.


  50. - Cable Line Gardener - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 7:03 pm:

    No-I will live with the permanent scars in my one eye. We were too young and the ’safe’ firewood was defective. Leave it to the professionals.


  51. - ArchPundit - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 7:22 pm:

    You might convince me to allow the use for a few days around the fourth, but I’d suggest those who want to allow it all the time talk to some folks with PTSD. It’s a scourge on them and on pets for it to be more than a few days a year.


  52. - Benjamin - Wednesday, Jul 1, 26 @ 9:52 pm:

    Absolutely not. Illegal fireworks in the Chicago are already a scourge around the 4th of July. Making them legal to purchase and use would only encourage more of the same. If keeping fireworks illegal in this state is only a small deterrent to more people joining in, it’s worth it to me.


  53. - Lumpy Rutherford - Thursday, Jul 2, 26 @ 7:49 am:

    As a retired Firefighter, I’ve seen way too many injuries from fireworks. Unlike the professionals hired by municipalities, when the amateurs in the neighborhoods are blowing them off at 2a.m., it’s usually accompanied by heavy drinking. Not a good combination. Leave it to the professionals.


  54. - Geo#1 - Thursday, Jul 2, 26 @ 10:22 am:

    I worked in the fire service for 40 years and witnessed way too many fireworks injuries. Municipalities spend thousands of dollars to host professional fireworks displays. These displays continue to be the best option for the observation of safe displays prepared by trained professional pyrotechnicians. Leave it to the professionals!
    Keep fireworks out of the hands of amateurs.


  55. - Geo1 - Thursday, Jul 2, 26 @ 10:33 am:

    In my forty years in the fire service I has witnessed way too many injuries as a result of fireworks. Municipalities across the state host professional fireworks displays in part to discourage use of fireworks by untrained, and unlicensed people. Leave the fireworks up to the professionals! Keep fireworks out of the hands of the untrained.


  56. - LEAVE IT TO THE PROFESSIONALS - Thursday, Jul 2, 26 @ 10:39 am:

    Illinois’ current fireworks laws prioritize public safety while still allowing residents to enjoy professionally conducted displays. Expanding consumer fireworks would likely increase preventable injuries, fires, property damage, and demands on fire, EMS, and law enforcement agencies. Professional displays are conducted by trained, licensed operators with appropriate safety measures, significantly reducing risk to spectators and surrounding communities. Legalization would also create enforcement challenges and increase noise and quality-of-life concerns for residents, veterans, pets, and vulnerable populations. The existing laws provide a balanced approach that protects lives, property, and emergency resources while preserving opportunities for safe community celebrations.


  57. - Joel Severin - Thursday, Jul 2, 26 @ 11:50 am:

    “Should the state lift its ban on the purchase and use of fireworks.” NO Way


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - News update
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Campaign news
* Independent congressional candidates crash into legal realities
* Turning Promise Into Progress For Illinois Students
* Maybe answer the question
* Governor Pritzker, Fight For Us.
* Rate the new Pritzker TV ad
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Good morning!
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Selected press releases (Live coverage)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2026
June 2026
May 2026
April 2026
March 2026
February 2026
January 2026
December 2025
November 2025
October 2025
September 2025
August 2025
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS | SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax | Advertise Here | Mobile Version | Contact Rich Miller