|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Another #MeToo moment?
Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller * Here we go again?…
The activist might want to think about moving that presser up to tomorrow in case they leave town Wednesday night or early Thursday. Also, absolutely no speculation will be permitted in comments. Don’t get yourself banned for life. *** UPDATE *** Sun-Times…
|
|
Madigan says Rauner is “willfully misleading taxpayers”
Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller * Press release…
Well, that kind of language will help the budget talks I’m sure. Say what you want about him, but the governor has stayed pretty darned mum lately, and that hasn’t hurt things. Just the opposite. * The roll call is here. Just 61 members voted for it. The Democrats voting against it were pretty much what you’d expect: Costello, Kifowit and Scherer. Kifowit is the only non-target. DeLuca, Drury and Yingling (another target) didn’t vote. But Rep. Natalie Phelps Finnie and Katie Stuart, both Tier One targets, voted “Yes.” That’ll make for some interesting ads. …Adding… Rauner campaign…
|
|
*** UPDATED x2 *** Breen makes budget demands on abortion funding
Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller * Some background is here. From Illinois Review…
Um, no. Medicaid and state employee group health insurance aren’t appropriated like that. No disrespect intended because I’m just using this example for illustrative purposes, but you won’t find a line item for costs due to treating broken bones, either. There are some specific Medicaid approps for grants, but this wouldn’t fall under that topic. I suppose you could insert a line and give it a $0 value, but state law now requires abortions to be funded, so, if we learned anything during the impasse, we know the judiciary will undoubtedly step in and force the state to follow the law it just passed. The law says fund abortions for Medicaid recipients and state employees, so the state has no choice but to fund them unless and until that statute is repealed. * From Rep. Breen’s comments…
The General Assembly did take a vote on this topic last year when it passed HB40, which mandated this funding. So, a majority already exists. And it’s now the law of the land. Like it or hate it, the state has to fund it. * Unless they separate those two approps out of the main budget bill and put them on a stand-alone bill, the only option Rep. Breen really has is to vote against the budget and all budgets moving forward unless something happens to HB40. He could also work to gin up opposition to the budget, but he’s a member of House GOP leadership - and the last floor leader who worked hard against Leader Durkin on a budget is retiring in January. And, by the way, there’s sharp disagreement over HB40’s actual cost. It’s been on the books since January 1st, so I suppose we could probably get an estimate soon. *** UPDATE 1 *** Media advisory…
*** UPDATE 2 *** Text from Rep. Breen…
The idea of splitting out the approp into a stand-alone looks like where this demand is heading.
|
|
Rauner starts cutting ribbons
Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller * It’s an election year, after all…
That McClugage Bridge replacement, among lots of other stuff, was in the governor’s capital plan he unveiled in February. * From the Civic Federation’s analysis of that capital plan…
…Adding… DGA…
|
|
*** LIVE *** Session coverage
Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller * As a side note, the Senate is planning to convene this Thursday the 31st at ten o’clock in the morning. Is that a sign they believe the budget will be wrapped up early? Could be. Until then, follow the action with ScribbleLive…
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |








