|
*** UPDATED x1 - Rauner administration responds *** AFSCME explains Rauner’s overtime pay demand
Friday, Dec 16, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller * AFSCME Council 31 is handing out a new flier to state workers to counter some of the statements made by the Rauner administration. This part was the most interesting to me. Click here for the full flier…
I asked the governor’s office for a response at about 1:30. I’ll post it if they send one. * Related…
*** UPDATE *** From Catherine Kelly…
|
|
But what if Drury does run?
Friday, Dec 16, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller * Rep. Scott Drury is not the most popular guy in the House. Let’s all stipulate to that. He’s on the odd side, if you ask me. But what if he does run for House Speaker? When cornered, politically vulnerable House Democrats always tell reporters and constituents that they had a binary choice between voting for fellow Democrat Mike Madigan and voting for the Republican, so they went with the Democrat. But if Drury runs, HDems could conceivably have a choice between voting for the Democrat Madigan and voting for a Democrat who’s also a “former federal prosecutor,” as Drury loves to refer to himself. * People out there in Voter Land simply don’t know Drury like many Statehouse types do. All they’ll know is that some “reformer” Democrat stuck his neck out and the mushrooms still voted for Madigan, who is the most unpopular politician in this state by far. That’s a precarious position for Downstate and suburban targets. And, don’t kid yourself, plenty of Chicago Democrats also hear about Madigan at the doors and at events. Drury could make life seriously complicated for his caucus. …Adding… Some of you may be missing the point here. I doubt at this point that Drury can actually get elected. He’s Scott Drury, after all, and just about every HDem member has already pledged a vote for Madigan. This post is about the potential political consequences of voting with Madigan and against Drury.
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |








