|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - PART 2 - Schock; Mendoza; Smith; Mitchell; Bivins
Tuesday, Oct 21, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller
Enter your password to view comments |
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Money; Hoffman; Hassert; Cross; SDems; Dunn; Munson; Pay; Raoul (Use all caps in password)
Tuesday, Oct 21, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller
Enter your password to view comments |
|
More hurtful drama
Tuesday, Oct 21, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * From the AP…
I can’t believe the AP let that one go unchallenged. So what if the governor restores the cuts and revenue tanks? What does one have to do with the other? The General Assembly made some very specific cut restorations by using targeted skims from existing money in special state funds. Even if the overall budget completely tanks, there will be zero impact on the legislative package approved by the General Assembly, because it didn’t rely on any General Revenue Fund money. If GRF goes down, those special funds aren’t reduced. * What’s going on here is that the guv’s office is saying if GRF is way down they just may cut those programs again. Even after the General Assembly made its will known by overwhelmingly voting to restore funding for those facilities, programs and services. The argument that some of the skims aren’t allowed, which is made elsewhere in the piece, may or may not have validity. As of yet nobody has laid out the full legal reasoning. But this game of “I cut, you restore, I cut again” is a bit much. * Lots of administration types read this blog and comment here. I welcome the input. But I would like all of them to watch this video of a woman and her children being forced out of an alcohol and substance abuse center and into a homeless shelter because of this stupid, disgusting game…
|
|
Mother Tribune opens up its latest poll to us little people
Tuesday, Oct 21, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Tribune’s latest poll doesn’t tell us much that most of us already didn’t know or suspect…
* More…
* What is new, however, is that the Tribune has finally decided to post its poll results online. Mother Tribune has refused to do this in the past, so nobody knew what they might be withholding from us lowly plebes. So, when you see something like this in the article…
You can go to the poll and see that Obama leads among men (55-34) as well as women (58-30). That’s unusual. By the way, a 47-39 Obama lead in the collar counties is truly significant. And a four-point lead downstate, even though the MoE is pretty high for that result, is still nothing to sneeze at. * Looking at the poll also gives us this narrative…
Suburban women are absolutely key to winning Illinois. McCain is getting trounced in that demographic. And he’s not doing nearly as well as he should among conservatives. * Also not mentioned in the Trib story was this result on a question of which veep candidate is more qualifid to take over the duties of president. You may want to click the pic for a larger version… ![]() * And this little, but unsurprising nugget got buried…
The poll itself shows that McCain voters are sharply divided over President Bush’s job approval: 43-44. Also, 78 percent of independents disapprove of Bush’s performance, while just 12 percent approve. * Somewhat related…
|
| « NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |








