SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 - Madigan says bill 12 votes shy *** Still short

Wednesday, Mar 13, 2013

*** UPDATE *** House Speaker Michael Madigan says the vote gap is even worse than the Windy City Times/Illinois Review estimate…


[ *** End Of Update *** ]

* The Windy City Times took a close look last week at where the roll call stood on same sex marriage. The Illinois Review published it in a more unreadable form, apparently unaware that they were getting their source information from a gay publication.

I looked at the list, which purports to show that gay marriage is ten votes shy of passage. I’ve talked to some of the House members on that list and I think some of the “No” votes are now leaning in favor of the bill.

But it isn’t going to be easy. One House Democrat I talked with last week wants to vote for gay marriage, but his strongly Catholic wife is absolutely, completely dead set against it. Sometimes, these things happen. Legislators are human beings, after all. He said he’d likely push for an amendment strengthening the protections for religious institutions.

Even with a generous tilt, I think it’s still maybe one to five votes shy of passage, depending on whatever the prevailing winds are at the moment. But proponents are pretty darned sure they can pass this thing, so expect a very strong final push.

* Meanwhile, this isn’t gonna work at all

Paul Caprio, Family PAC’s director, provides the voice in the robocall and says, “Your state representative Mike Smiddy has received $6,500 from Chicago homosexuals.”

Henry County Republican Jon Zahm works as a field director for Family PAC and sent a statement to local media about the robocall.

Mr. Zahm initially said he did not know which “Chicago homosexuals” the robocall referred to.

But in a subsequent interview he pointed to donations to Rep. Smiddy’s election campaign from two groups that advocate for equal rights for gay people and to a contribution from Fred Eychaner, who Mr. Zahm said is “openly gay.”

The robocall…

Smiddy is an avowed liberal. No way will a robocall move him off that bill

“This is an issue primarily about the welfare of the children, protection of children, and what effect same-sex marriage has on that welfare and outcome,” Family-PAC’s Caprio said Sunday, claiming that children would less likely know their cultural and medical history if their parents were gay.

“Is it possible that what they call Parent 1 and Parent 2 could raise a child in a loving manner? Sure. But don’t you think it’s important a person know who their biological parents are?” he said.

Smiddy said adopted children can seek out their biological parents regardless of the parents’ orientation and called Caprio’s assertion “ridiculous.”

“I honestly thought it was a very ridiculous comment and a very untrue comment,” Smiddy said.

Caprio’s statement that he has been taking money from “Chicago homosexuals” is “greatly offensive.”

* And while these robocalls are more interesting, I’m not sure how effective they’ll be

With a vote looming in the Illinois House, Rev. James Meeks is taking a stand against same-sex marriage by sending an “emergency message” to Illinois households.

Meeks, pastor of Salem Baptist Church on Chicago’s South Side and former state senator, said the pre-recorded call that reached roughly 200,000 households in 14 legislative districts beginning Friday was sent mostly to African-Americans.

“Please listen closely,” the message began. “Your state representative in Springfield is under serious pressure to redefine marriage in Illinois. If marriage between one man and one woman is redefined to add same-sex marriage, our family structure, as we know it, is in serious jeopardy.

“While being a member of the General Assembly for the last 10 years, I maintained the fact that this decision is too big for 177 people to make. If we are going to change Illinois, as we know it on such a broad scale, then your voice and input are very much needed.”

The National Organization for Marriage, a nonprofit that lobbies for defining marriage between a man and a woman, funded the pre-recorded message. The group’s backers include a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and a presidential appointee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

“Obviously [Meeks is] a very well known figure in the area,” said Brian Brown, the organization’s president and co-founder. “He’s an African-American standing up for the issue. We’re very happy he was willing to make the calls and stand up for marriage.”

Then again, Meeks may only have to scare one or two votes off the bill to kill it. Stay tuned.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


51 Comments
  1. - Chavez-respecting Obamist - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:03 am:

    Two things:

    Why would children who have gay parents not know who their biological parents are/were? Is it some kind of gay thing where the couple pretends they had the kid the same way other couples have children? If it’s a lesbian couple, they do what my brother and his wife did–eventually they explain IVF to the child when said child is old enough to understand about the test tube.

    And also equal rights are good for the economy: http://progressillinois.com/posts/content/2013/03/12/marriage-equality-boosts-economy


  2. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:19 am:

    The level of anti-gay vitriol from some of these people greatly saddens me. The treatment of gays by these people essentially indicates that they think gay people are less than equal members of society.

    First of all, these robocalls about donations by “homosexuals” couldn’t be any more offensive. Not that anybody has a right to not be offended, but the insinuation about gays with this robocall is disgusting.

    Second, as a gay person and a parent of 3 children, I get very angry when people suggest that I am somehow less of a family and less of a parent simply because I am gay. What really infuriates me about the Family-PAC statement is this particular phrase: “protection of children.” Protection from what exactly? Are gay people dangerous somehow? Maybe they are trying to protect kids from the loving family gay people can provide to kids.

    Finally, I am most saddened by our religious leaders’ assault against gays. If the issue were somehow related to the fact that churches would be forced to marry gay people then I would likely side with them. But that’s not the issue. Nobody is forcing churches to participate in these ceremonies. Their issue is simple: it offends are religious beliefs and we believe our religious beliefs trump everything else. I have news for these pastors. You and your followers are free to believe what you want. It’s a free country, and I’m thankful that we are allowed to shout our beliefs, in public, from the highest mountain. But, when it comes to my life, and more importantly my rights as a member of society, you need to keep your noses out of it. I’m not bound by your religious beliefs.

    A lot of people argue that gays are militant and try to throw it in everybody’s face. And, there are some that do go about it the wrong way. The reason I am so passionate is because there is an attack on me going on. And that attack is based solely on the fact that I am gay. I have news for the world. Gay people exist and they are here to stay. We have a right to be treated with respect and dignity and not be treated as some sort of lesser human beings simply because we are gay. I’m tired of the anti-gay rhetoric and I look forward to the continued fight against those who are anti-gay until we ground them into oblivion and take our place as an equal member of society.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:23 am:

    Caprio and Zahm…

    They are the BEST examples of being “Right”, instead of winning at the Ballot Box.

    I have nothing against anyone being against SSM, or even saying they are going to vote against it.

    My issue has always been, you can NOT have one issue, ANY one issue, be the “Litmus Test” to your credibility of being a Republican.

    Family-PAC, and those who “speak” for that organization make no bones about, “Our way, or the highway, and if we cut off your nose to spite all of us …GOOD!”

    Really? Chicago Homosexuals?

    Are Peoria Homosexuals more “tolerable” to Caprio or Zahm? “Well, it was a ‘Peoria Homosexual’ who gave money, maybe we should re-think this. ..”

    Zealots who … THINK … they can dictate the “no tolerance” doctrine, or be seen as a RINO miss the point of being part of a Political Party. Religions can, and do, dictate the morality of its followers, and that is the role. Politcal Parties are not a “religion”, although it is easy to find the GOP Zealots who try to stain anyone opposed to them …RINO.

    Now I know Smiddy is a Dem. I am not missing THAT point, but Family-PAC’s history or threats and “slates” and intimidation towards Republicans, based on what Family-PAC thinks a “true Republican” should be, is exactly the rationale of these RoboCalls in Smiddy’s district is the “wake-up” call to any Republican in the House;

    “We called into Smiddy’s District, don’t think we won’t do the same to you.”

    Work the bill, Family-PAC, kill it, do the work necessary to succeed, but let’s stop with the “Chicago Homosexuals”. It’s shameful, embarrassing, and reeks of a group more desperate about a failing issue, than an organization that can make valid points to influence legislation.

    One last thought …Does Family-PAC… think …there are NO homosexuals outside
    Chicago? A valid question, since it appears Family-PAC is worried about an … invasion… of its Purity outside Chicago?

    Just wondering.


  4. - Just Me - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:23 am:

    I thought equal marriage was a part of the Democratic party’s platform, and since the House is controlled by Democrats, I’m surprised there is an issue. I thought elected officials and party leaders always followed the platform or were removed from their positions?

    Oh wait…..


  5. - Keep Calm and Carry On - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:28 am:

    “Just Me” makes a good point.

    Highly instructive example of how the two parties deal with differences of opinion.


  6. - qcexaminer - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:28 am:

    “Legislators are human beings”? What about human rights? What about being on the right side of history? What about the right to be with who you love? What about the civil rights struggle of our times?

    Oops, politics happen.

    Checking out the yes vote list I noticed Pat Verschoore is a yes for SSM but voted against civil unions. What’s up with that?

    Rich you always like to point out the pressure the Catholic Church and other traditional values groups use, but you never, ever say anything about the tactics gay advocacy groups use.

    I’ll bet you have some juicy stories about THAT!


  7. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:33 am:

    - Just Me -,

    Great Point!

    Well said, and thank you for shining a harsh, but needed spotlight on what seems to be the “struggle” of My Party, that doesn’t need to be a “struggle”… at all.

    Thanks.


  8. - Esquire - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:37 am:

    I would like to listen to the taped message from Reverend Meeks.


  9. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:49 am:

    Flipping 12 votes would seem to be a bridge too far at this point.


  10. - Conservative Republican - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:49 am:

    Get a clue. The “Chicago homosexuals” reference is not some indication that Chicago is more gay than any other part of the state, but that the Chicago-centric GBLT PAC money is driving this issue, with the consequences being felt in downstate districts. Its an anti Chicago dig, subsumed in the pro-family rallying cry.


  11. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:51 am:

    Needing 12 votes is a tough “ask” for Rep. Harris to get fairly quick.

    This Bill is going to need some “work” and time, like a Late May timetable.

    Speaker Madigan ain’t no “Vote Countula”.


  12. - ZC - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 9:51 am:

    >> I’m surprised there is an issue. I thought elected officials and party leaders always followed the platform or were removed from their positions?

    Just Me, this is an intensely visible vote that is highly salient to the public (and media) and one that even normally under-informed Illinoisans will have a moral opinion about. To use a poli sci term, it’s highly “traceable” come election (and primary) time. Different rules apply, is my supposition.


  13. - Wensicia - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:00 am:

    Very disappointing.


  14. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:01 am:

    ===I’ll bet you have some juicy stories about THAT!===

    Actually, not really. So far, at least, it’s been pretty tame and standard stuff.


  15. - Skeeter - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:05 am:

    Not to digress, but this is at least the second time in recent memory (the other was with Todd V) where the Illinois Review has basically taken another publication’s work without attributing the source.

    Somebody over there needs to take a look at what they are doing.


  16. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:05 am:

    @Conservative Republican:

    I don’t understand your comment about the “consequences being felt in downstate districts.” Are you suggesting that Chicago is the only area that supports same sex marriage and that this somehow is a steamroll of downstate? I live downstate and fully support same sex marriage as do many other people I know that live downstate. This isn’t a Chicago centric issue no matter how hard some of you attempt to say it is.


  17. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:07 am:

    ===Get a clue.===

    Since I was … MOCKING … the idea of Chicago being more/less/same than say, Peoria, maybe you need to read things more carefully.

    ===Its an anti Chicago dig.===

    Really? Or is it both a “Chicago” dig, or a “Homosexual” dig?

    If you say it’s not a “Homosexual” dig too, then why the heck get involved in SSM which is supported … by Homosexuals?

    Can’t wish away the “dig” as geography-only.


  18. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:11 am:

    “The “Chicago homosexuals” reference is not some indication that Chicago is more gay than any other part of the state….”

    Even with the proposed NHL realignment from 6 divisions to 4, I’d expect Bettman to shut down the league owned revenue draining Phoenix franchise, so maybe Chicago could get a second hockey team.


  19. - Colossus - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:21 am:

    Anon@10:11 - You owe me a clean keyboard. This one has too much coffee on it.


  20. - Shoeless - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    I’m interested in the possibility of horse-trading. Is it possible that say, some downstaters could be persuaded to vote for marriage equality of some non-downstaters say they’ll back off, at the least, anything to ban or freeze fracking? Just an idea.

    I’m amazed by the legislator who’d rather not upset his wife than vote for this bill. Would this be acceptable if his wife were opposed to [insert name of oppressed minority group legislation here]?


  21. - Served - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 10:33 am:

    I’m going to need clarification from Paul Caprio. If I was born and raised and went to college downstate, but now reside in Chicago, do I count as a Chicago Homosexual, or should I register as something else?


  22. - the Patriot - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:01 am:

    The vote shows the reality that a majority of IL voters may want it, but most of those are in Chicago. The lack of votes shows that a majority of downstate districts do not want it or care.

    I really think the problem for SSM proponents is they are still a very small minority of people and our society is so self involved, most people just don’t care. Do you think the basic downstate voter is going to back his legislator because of how he feels about taxes, pensions, guns, education, or SSM. This makes a great blog topic, but like it or not this issue is not even on the radar for a majority of voters.


  23. - Ruby - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:14 am:

    Patriot, the same can be said of the ERA, but here we are 89 years later and the ERA is still not ratified in Illinois.


  24. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:15 am:

    ===The vote shows the reality that a majority of IL voters may want it, but most of those are in Chicago. The lack of votes shows that a majority of downstate districts do not want it or care.===

    If a majority of ILLINOIS voters … want it … why does it matter where?

    Can you clarify? No snark, asking… Can you clarify how you reconcile a majority of Illinois voters differs as to where those voters are …?


  25. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:23 am:

    Further,

    Are you saying that, as PER district, when you “count” the districts and those who represent those districts, there is the disconnect, like the ERA votes, for example?

    A mojority of voters favor “X”, but they are packed in too few districts to overturn the other Reps. whose district may/may not have a large enough constituency to influence the elected Rep?

    That is what I am/was think you were going, am I right?


  26. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:37 am:

    Been saying to have a Referendum on this for quite a while… Let the people decide, and then our elected officials can assure that laws are written to protect EVERYONE’s rights, including Churches.


  27. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    @Cinci:

    YOU DON’T VOTE ON ISSUES OF EQUAL RIGHTS. I get tired of this mantra that the “people” should get to vote on issues. You already did vote - for a Representative. If you don’t like our system then move to change it. Otherwise work within it.


  28. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:44 am:

    @Cinci:

    Also point to me where the law DOESN’T protect Churches. That’s always been a red herring argument for those looking for cover to oppose SSM.


  29. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:46 am:

    Again right on target OW…

    Think the Meeks call is going to have an impact.


  30. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:46 am:

    - Been saying to have a Referendum on this for quite a while… -

    And it’s roundly been pointed out that in Illinois that wouldn’t matter. It’s just a cop out so you don’t have to admit you’re against.

    It’s coming, if not this session, likely the next. The world won’t end, and those who oppose it loudest will leave a shameful legacy.


  31. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:47 am:

    I normally hang up as soon as I realize a call is robo-political, but maybe I shouldn’t.

    Not only does that beat most sitcoms, it takes less time.


  32. - Ray Midge - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:50 am:

    @Patriot - You’re half right. Most people don’t care. But if you ask them their opinion, they think, “If two people want to get married, who am I to stand in their way?” That’s the majority view in Illinois, and in the country.


  33. - Chavez-respecting Obamist - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 11:59 am:

    If this is such a non-issue among Downstate voters, why wouldn’t their reps vote for it? They should not fear backlash over an issue no one cares about.


  34. - Arthur Andersen - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 12:18 pm:

    Chavez, good point and congrats on the best new handle we’ve seen around here in some time. Love it.


  35. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 12:20 pm:

    - AA - beat me to it, I enjoy that handle, - Chavez-respecting Obamist -.

    Well done!!


  36. - Midwest Mom - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 1:08 pm:

    Demoralized and Chavez–
    I agree completely. EQUAL RIGHTS IS NOT UP FOR VOTE!

    If we keep screwing around with this, MN will beat us to it and we’ll appear even more incompetant. Even IA beat us to it! CO just made a step forward this week as well. IT’S TIME TO GET ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY.


  37. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 1:20 pm:

    Perspective in today’s Salon from a former Iowa GOP state senator, Jeff Angelo, who sponsored a state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, on the state’s four-year experience with gay marriage:

    –“Most of our small towns have people in them that are gay, and live peaceful lives. They’re not made to feel like outsiders. So what occurred to me was that the political debate didn’t really match up what was going on in Iowa communities. And that’s when I thought this is just unfair. There’s no evil force that’s out there that’s trying to destroy marriage. It was people that just wanted to fall in love, and have stable families and monogamous relationships just like I do. That’s what changed my mind.”–

    I’m sure Family PAC would say he’s a tool of those Des Moines homosexuals.

    http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/former_gop_state_senator_no_evil_force_is_trying_to_destroy_marriage/


  38. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 1:55 pm:

    For the record, thanks - OneMan -, appreciate that.

    ===…he’s a tool of those Des Moines homosexuals.===

    Wonder what cities Family-PAC has homosexuals they agree with …

    Yeah, that’s what I thought.


  39. - ChicagoR - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 2:02 pm:

    Well, guess I’ll put the tux away for a while…


  40. - LincolnLounger - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 2:34 pm:

    Can somebody explain to me why the Speaker was giving out vote counts on an issue like this? Wouldn’t he defer to Harris?

    I’m sure I am missing something.


  41. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 2:37 pm:

    –Can somebody explain to me why the Speaker was giving out vote counts on an issue like this? Wouldn’t he defer to Harris?–

    Not surprisingly, I suspect he wants to put pressure on some suburban Republicans who would like to see the issue go away.


  42. - LincolnLounger - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 2:54 pm:

    Possibly, wordslinger (your condescension noted, by the way). Some of my friends say he just gave cover to African-American legislators afraid of their church leaders.


  43. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 3:04 pm:

    LL, I don’t know where you see the condescension. I’m not very subtle.


  44. - Chavez-respecting Obamist - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 3:58 pm:

    FTR, I am the poster formerly known as Cheryl44. I just couldn’t resist.


  45. - haverford - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 4:24 pm:

    Late to the game here, but had to comment about the mystery legislator.

    He was sent there to represent his constituents, not his wife.


  46. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 4:32 pm:

    In terms of donations, unless I have missed something you have to report you who work for and not much else…

    Just waiting for the day one of my donations becomes

    “Donations from obese suburban curlers”


  47. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 4:35 pm:

    ===Not surprisingly, I suspect he wants to put pressure on some suburban Republicans who would like to see the issue go away.===

    100% concur.

    The Speaker is not being subtle to “educate” all the “Undecided”s as to where everything stands …If there are ZERO Reublicans, and it fails, and after all this SSM-ILGOP dust up, this is not done by accident.


  48. - Just Me - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 5:14 pm:

    @Concinnatus: Illinois is a republic form of government. We elect our officials to vote on legislation. You should advocate for a constitutional amendment, and then your point will make sense.


  49. - Just The Way It Is One - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 6:47 pm:

    This one’s going to be a Cliffhanger at best, and apparently, as previous mutterings have indicated, as well as this current report, the proposal may just fall short. Hence, on such an incredibly divided issue, is it really the best thing to push right now? Highly questionable…


  50. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 7:16 pm:

    –Hence, on such an incredibly divided issue, is it really the best thing to push right now? Highly questionable…–

    LOL, nice try.

    Supporters want a vote. Hard-core opponents want a vote.

    Those who don’t want to vote, don’t want a vote.

    But there will be a vote. And it will be recorded.

    And that scares some quite a bit.


  51. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 13, 13 @ 7:41 pm:

    ===Supporters want a vote. Hard-core opponents want a vote.

    Those who don’t want to vote, don’t want a vote.

    But there will be a vote. And it will be recorded===

    lol

    Too true! That Madigan…


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Remap reformers say recordings of Con-Con debates support their case
* Question of the day
* Sunlight Foundation tags the wrong Michael J. Madigan
* Rauner vetoes bills pushed by disability advocates, first responders, unions
* Independent Maps has appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court
* Rauner signs three controversial bills: Marijuana decriminalization, Contraception coverage; "Right of Conscience Act"
* Republicans "pledge" not to vote for Madigan for Speaker
* More on the Lottery announcement
* Caption contest!
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Whatever the number is, it's still pretty darned high
* Careful what you wish for
* Duckworth speech focused on Trump as new ads slam her
* Just legalize it, already
* Today's number: 32 percent
* Cullerton repeats demand that Rauner will decide tax hike
* One way 2016 could impact 2018
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Is it over or not?
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Samsung sets up battery test, Galaxy S7 wins it (of course)
* Microsoft awards hardware startup ENTy the 2016 Imagine Cup
* Review: Standzout's Helix Dock for Apple Watch is Compact and Convenient
* Pokémon Go’s paying user base has reached a plateau
* ZTE Axon 7 Unboxing: Budget busting first impressions
* One source might have all the answers for OPPO F1s specs
* [TA Deals] Get yourself hosted on the web with A2 Hosting and a Radix “.tech” domain

* White Sox playing part in trade deadline pitching freeze
* Offense lacking for White Sox in ace's return
* The 5 toughest 'buy or sell' dilemmas
* Sale rejoins team with tough-luck loss
* Offense lacking for White Sox in Sale's return
* Offense lacking for White Sox in ace's return
* A relentless Rizzo teased Navarro as only an ex-teammate could

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penaltie.....
* Gov. Rauner signs bill reducing pot penalties i.....
* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penaltie.....
* The PI Week In Review..
* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penaltie.....
* Gov signs bill reducing marijuana penalties in .....
* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penaltie.....
* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penaltie.....
* Letter: Rauner veto compromises Alzheimer's car.....
* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penaltie.....


* Obama Foundation formally announces library's Chicago site
* Drew Peterson gets 40-year sentence in murder-for-hire case
* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penalties in Illinois
* Deadly Chicago police-involved shooting under investigation
* Authorities: Arrest made in 2015 Burlington shooting death
* Rauner vetoes plan aimed at preventing elderly care cutbacks
* Obama Foundation formally announces library's Chicago site
* APNewsBreak: Rauner signs bill reducing pot penalties
* The Latest: Special prosecutor appointed in McDonald case
* Officer says prosecutors silenced him in Sandra Bland case

* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penalties in Illinois
* Duckworth lawsuit settlement final, attorney general says
* Illinois seeking new private manager for state's lottery
* Attorney General: Duckworth lawsuit settlement final
* Health-care hiring keeps local unemployment at lowest in state
* Local unemployment again lowest in state for June
* Durbin rips Rauner, says governor tries to divide Illinois
* Illinois seeking new private manager for state's lotter
* Chicago-area man convicted of $4.7 million Medicaid fraud
* Blagojevich won't attend resentencing, to take part by video

* GOP still betting millions on Madigan's unpopularity
* Chicago's budget gap: $137.6 million
* Why aren't more Chicago businesses adopting schools?
* Rauner signs bill reducing pot penalties
* Behind Harvard shakeup, a star trading desk that unraveled fast


* Man charged with slaying of hoops standout Jonathan Mills
* Heyward homers, drives in three runs as Cubs rout Mariners, 12-1
* Bears G Ted Larsen ‘not scared of any rookies or younger guys’
* Prosecutor: Student ‘smirked’ when confronted with rape charge
* John Fountain: Spitting facts to fight fiction
* Bears notebook: Kyle Long ‘day-by-day’ with left calf strain
* Man held without bail in murder on notorious West Englewood block
* Metra’s midday express service on Rock Island Line starts Monday
* Chicago has had more than its share of, um, colorful characters
* Daley nephew’s probation ends in Koschman case


* What to watch for at Rio's opening ceremony
* Tale of two conventions: Emanuel goes from influential leader to fading star
* Ex-judge named to probe conduct of Chicago cops after Laquan McDonald shooting
* Friday's recap: Cubs 12, Mariners 1
* South Side man charged in slaying of North Lawndale basketball standout
* More charges filed against man accused of suburban mom's fatal highway shooting
* Bears lineman Mitch Unrein's wife takes aim at gold in Rio
* One officer dead, another seriously wounded in San Diego shootout
* Lollapalooza day two: Day Waves bring good-natured jangle
* UIC student charged with sexual assault of ex-high school classmate


* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penalties in Illinois
* Charles Krauthammer: What's the case for Hillary?
* Duckworth lawsuit settlement final, attorney general says
* Illinois seeking new private manager for state's lottery
* Attorney General: Duckworth lawsuit settlement final
* Health-care hiring keeps local unemployment at lowest in state
* Local unemployment again lowest in state for June
* Durbin rips Rauner, says governor tries to divide Illinois
* Chicago-area man convicted of $4.7 million Medicaid fraud
* Blagojevich won't attend resentencing, to take part by video


* Near ideal growing weather in most areas
* Franklin Hospital adopts controversial ER provider policy as temporary solution
* Governor signs bill reducing marijuana penalties in Illinois
* Drew Peterson gets 40-year sentence in murder-for-hire case
* Thomasboro man accused of molesting boy
* Veto clears way for changes to elderly care program
* 2 in custody over robbery at Sprint store in Champaign
* Governor signs bill decriminalizing marijuana in Illinois
* Interim CEO named at Sarah Bush Lincoln
* Rantoul man arraigned for aggravated battery


* Wood Dale's Prairie Fest washed out again
* Wade followed his dream back to Chicago
* Motorola Solutions sells rest of Schaumburg campus
* Prospect graduate sues District 214, claiming discrimination
* Viking ship named for Arlington Heights man's ancestor

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Dick Durbin leads pack in Dem governor pol......
* Illinois, Wisconsin briefs - Dubuque Teleg......

* 2 US Senate candidates fail to gather need......

* Texas prosecutors drop felony charges on Center for Medical Progress investigative journalists
* Rauner signs bill requiring pro-life medical personnel, agencies to disobey their consciences
* Surviving Health Care
* Strick calls for candidates to reject Madigan for House Speaker
* O'Keefe poses as Hillary supporter among angry Bernie fans
* 'Freedom Square' Tent City
* The PI Week In Review
* Democratic Party Platform slides left to appease Sanders supporters
* Former East St. Louis sex trafficker sentenced to 30 years
* Rep. Ives signs "No vote for Speaker Madigan" pledge


* Governor Takes Bill Action
* Governor Announces Appointments
* Governor Rauner and Illinois Lottery Seek New Management Partner
* College Changes Everything™ Conference Highlights Critical Role Of Higher Education In Economic Recovery And Growth
* Summer Camp Builds Bonds between Incarcerated Moms and Children




Hosted by MCS -- CapitolFax.com Privacy Policy -- SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax -- Advertise Here -- Mobile Version -- Contact Rich Miller