Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Fox Chicago looks at HGOP staff, primaries
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Fox Chicago looks at HGOP staff, primaries

Wednesday, Feb 24, 2010

* Fox Chicago followed up on its “Madigoons” story from yesterday with one about the House Republicans

The Republicans are doing the very same thing as Democrats. We discovered 13 staffers taking a leaves of absence and being farmed out to do political work.

It’s not included in the Fox write-up, but if you watch the video you’ll see the chit-chat after the story included a charge from the House Democrats that 13 HGOP staffers taken off the payroll is way too low, along with a suggestion that the Republicans might have been using staff on state time for campaigns. The allegation wasn’t investigated further, however.

* House GOP Leader Tom Cross defended the practice of taking state staff off the payroll for campaigns…

“You get young kids that come to work for you that like politics and like policy and say I want to get involved in campaigns,” Cross said. “And that’s okay.”

As Cross explained, it’s only okay — and ethical — if there is a distinct line between state work done at taxpayer expense and political work done off the state payroll.

“We passed a law several years ago, an ethics bill, that made it very clear that you can’t do any political work while on state time,” he said. “Which would seem to be the obvious thing.”

Like the Democrats, we also found Republican staffers getting paychecks from campaigns while working fulltime for the state.

Leader Cross’s chief of staff Matthew O’Shea earned $140,000 in his state salary, but also collected $12,000 from the Republican party.

“He does political work, he likes it he want to do it,” Cross said of O’Shea’s two jobs. “It’s over and above his state work.”

* This is kinda interesting…

But there’s no explanation for another case uncovered by FOX Chicago Investigates. In July, 2008, house Republicans hired a pair of policy analysts to work for the state. After only two weeks on the job, they jumped off the state payroll to go work for the Republican party until after the November election.

So why put someone on the state payroll for two-weeks? Cross said he did not know the specifics of those two hirings.

* Patrick Collins kinda misses the point, at least when it comes to general elections…

“When [legislative leaders have] the ability to control the dollars as well as the people that’s really a one-two punch that can change the dynamic of a race,” he said.

Since everybody is doing this, it doesn’t really impact general elections. Primaries, however, are different stories…

When Democratic St. Rep. Dan Burke found himself in a tough race this year, Madigan told Burke to fire his campaign manager, and sent in state worker Tom Wogan to run Burke’s campaign.

Burke won.

Republicans also gave employees time off for the 2010 primary and paid them more than $50,000 dollars for campaign work.

Almost always, primary opponents who aren’t backed by the leaders are in a very disadvantageous position.

* Rich Means gets to the heart of the real problem here…

Election attorney Rich Means has battled state staffers on the campaign trail and says the ability to assign armies of state workers to political races gives legislative leaders a hammer.

“What it does is give all the power to the legislative leaders,” Means said. “It stifles political dissent within the political parties. It stifles independence in the legislature. It just closes the system down.”

* Picking on individual, rank-and-file staffers is way unfair. I don’t think Fox handled that aspect very well at all. In my mind, this issue is only tangentially about whether staff ought to be allowed to jump off state payrolls to work campaigns.

And completely separating politics from the Legislature is a goofy concept. Our democratic system is fundamentally based on campaigns - a basic fact that people like Collins don’t seem to understand. Still, there ought to be a limit.

What is important here is the power of the leaders. Without that staff, they can’t control their members nearly as well.

Here’s just one example: People who staff committees answer directly to the leaders, not the chairpersons and minority spokespersons. The leaders appoint the committee chairs. They appoint the committee members. It’s total, absolute control.

* Watch the entire Fox report


- Posted by Rich Miller        

47 Comments
  1. - Niles Township - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 8:53 am:

    So for all that talk comparing the local Fox station (WFLD) with the corporate cousin, Fox News Channel, it does appear that our local Fox station is actually ‘fair and balanced.’


  2. - Stones - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 8:57 am:

    You mean to tell me that people who work for the legislative leaders also do paid work for political campaigns? Thank goodness we have investigative reporting to enlighten us to these practices!


  3. - titan - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 8:57 am:

    Everyone who works in the political realm has opinions - usually very storng ones - about politics. If they didn’t, I would wonder if they were truly intelligent enough to be doing that sort of work. The good ones, though, they check their leanings at the door and do their work fairly.

    The idea that anything can be done in a “nonpartisan” fashion by appointed or “merit selected” people is a total myth. And one can’t separate govenrment from politics because teh sort of people who are enthused about it enough to do it for a living (and do it well) are by their nature political people.


  4. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:00 am:

    What is important here is the power of the leaders.

    I agree. There appears to be an unintended consequence that can be addressed by both political parties within their policies.

    Making this a state issue is a stretch. Expecting a solution via the state would be a stretch too. The best solution is the one closest to the identified issue. In my opinion, that would be the Democratic and Republican caucuses.

    We have to hold our political parties accountable for their misjudgements and mistakes. Claiming that “everyone” is responsible fails to do this. When this occurs, both parties end up colluding towards a lower ethical standard instead of seizing the opportunity to stand apart and winning with the higher ethical standard.

    This is not about Fox anymore than it would be about the color of the newspaper print used to present this information. Shooting the messenger is a fool’s errand.


  5. - Still Gettin Twisted - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:02 am:

    many people have talked about how FOX “picked” on the staffers. They didn’t “pick” on the GOP staffers.. Madigan declined to go on camera for the story. Cross went on camera. are the two related?


  6. - Wacker Drive - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:06 am:

    This is nothing, Blagojevich’s Illinois Tollway staff (big ones and little ones) collected pay checks from the tollway while getting paid for campaign work.
    When’s someone going to seriously investigate that cesspool of corruption?


  7. - Anon - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:07 am:

    I find it fascinating that the report specifically names several democratic staffers and goes so far as to show pictures, yet they refrain from naming a single republican staffer. If you watch both reports, the most “damning” part happens to be the statement that the HGOP put 2 people on payroll for a grand total of 2 weeks and then moved them to political…but, of course, they don’t mention the names of those people. Instead let’s show a picture of some guy who worked for Burke.


  8. - Indeedy - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:11 am:

    Interesting to me that Cross went on air for this story but Madigan did not, not last night or even the night before. In my opinion, if leadership won’t stand forward and speak to the issue, talking to their lieutenants is way fair.


  9. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:11 am:

    ===yet they refrain from naming a single republican staffer===

    They named the HGOP chief of staff.


  10. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:14 am:

    The real issue is leadership, that’s true, and that’s why the Fox Report was so off the mark. If staff practices are an issue, it’s minor in the scheme of things.

    Plus, even Don Hewitt and Dan Rather admitted that “gotcha” journalism is cheap and unfair.


  11. - Indeedy - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:14 am:

    **Instead let’s show a picture of some guy who worked for Burke.**

    Anon: There’s a reason for that. Unfortunately, that part of the story, old as the hills and not fleshed out sufficiently, is not being told.


  12. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:16 am:

    Plus, even Don Hewitt and Dan Rather admitted that “gotcha” journalism is cheap and unfair.

    Especially after they got caught up in Rathergate.


  13. - siriusly - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:21 am:

    It’s not as black and white as Fox would have us believe. The legislators, by nature, are making political decisions and doing political work almost always at the same time they are doing their official duties. Sure, they can’t raise political contributions on state property, but by the nature of their jobs the lines are completely blurred.

    So how can we not expect the staff people who work for those legislators to not have similar dual-responsibilities? The Madigan staff people have for a very long time been very diligent about the separation of work duties and work places. Those staffers work 60+ hours a week during session and they don’t get “overtime” like union-represented state workers, so I agree with Rich that Placko is a little out of bounds by focusing on them.

    Overall the story missed the mark for me. Staffers jumping on an off the payroll, that’s fine by me. But who controls the political staffs for the state is the real issue. It’s not the political parties, as it should be. The control is in the hands of the actual legislative leaders which is the problem.

    So when a legislator (like Rep. Burke) needs political help, he doesn’t ask the political party - he asks his legislative leader. That’s the problem IMHO.

    The legislative staffer doesn’t go to his boss and say “hey, can I take a leave of absence, I need to do something for my other job?” It goes like this “staffer - you are going on leave next week because Rep. XXX needs help with his primary campaign.” That’s where the problem exists, the control, not the actual concept of p-t


  14. - siriusly - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:22 am:

    This was also not exactly the Republican version of yesterday’s story. Part two was more like “here’s what we told you the Democrats to and oh yeah, the republicans do it too.”

    I don’t care about partisan balance because this isn’t a partisan story, but I’m just saying.


  15. - Coach - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:29 am:

    The fact that Cross went on camera and Madigan did not really is not a surprise. Madigan seldom speaks to the press (particularly when he is on the hot seat), while Cross regularly speaks with the press.

    More importantly, the lead to the story was incredibly misleading. By stating to viewers that “you’re paying for it” when staffers jump over to campaign work, Fox is more than implying that taxpayers are footing the bill for campaign activity — and that the staffers are therefore breaking the law. That’s simply not the case.

    Of course, it’s not nearly as sexy to begin a story by pointing out that staffers move to campaign payroll (off state payroll) precisely to avoid breaking the law. But that doesn’t excuse Fox’s blatantly misleading lead. It just goes to show how Fox’s story is fundamentally weak; they obscured the facts just to jazz it up.


  16. - Greg - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:31 am:

    Did many of you expect a positive, nuanced presentation of your industry? Do you think hedge funds, teachers, or any other field that gets frequent media attention is satisfied with the coverage? This isn’t picking on staffers…not if you were around to watch how non-CDS AIG employees were treated. Anything better than outright slander should be considered a victory when subject to such attention.


  17. - Jake from Elwood - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:47 am:

    Dane Placko’s answer as to how to best curb this practice in the future is to “stop them at the ballot box”. The solution offered is unrealistic given that the genesis of the “problem” is that state workers support party-affiliated candidates (often incumbents) to preserve the respective power bases. Not a real keen analysis there, Dane-O.


  18. - Anon2 - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:48 am:

    I cannot speak for both staffs. However, I am certain that for at least one of the parties, if not almost certainly both, any political work done off state-time is purely voluntary (voluntary in that involvement is not coerced; the staffers are still paid from political funds). Cross was correct, the staffers do it because they want to be involved, not because they are strong-armed into it. These people are not working for the DMV or the post office - It would be unnatural to have a partisan political staff with no interest in politics. These people ARE interested in politics and are practically begging to be involved in any way that they can in the “off season.” There is nothing wrong or immoral or illegal about these practices in either caucus.


  19. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:49 am:

    ==So when a legislator (like Rep. Burke) needs political help, he doesn’t ask the political party - he asks his legislative leader. That’s the problem IMHO.==

    So instead of asking Speaker Madigan they should ask Chairman Madigan?


  20. - Anon2 - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 9:55 am:

    “But there’s no explanation for another case uncovered by FOX Chicago Investigates. In July, 2008, house Republicans hired a pair of policy analysts to work for the state. After only two weeks on the job, they jumped off the state payroll to go work for the Republican party until after the November election.”

    Given the time frame, these two individuals were probably recent ILSIP interns that were retained permanently. Under this program, interns work for staff but are paid from the University of Illinois Springfield payroll. When they are retained, records would seem like they were just hired onto staff (because technically they were), but in reality, they had likely been there 10 or 11 months.


  21. - D.P. Gumby - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 10:09 am:

    As usual, Rich hits on the real story, which requires nuance, while the superficial media reports something that is more smoke than fire and melodrama than substance.


  22. - Obamarama - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 10:12 am:

    ===teh sort of people who are enthused about it enough to do it for a living (and do it well) are by their nature political people.===

    Amen, brother. Until reform groups and journalists understand the true, personal nature of these folks themselves…. wait that is never going to happen.

    Governing to some extent, and campaigning to a major extent is something that is in someone’s blood. Either you are cut out for it, or you aren’t (generally). Those of us who have been involved with campaigns intimately know this. How many times have you heard or said yourself “he/she is just not cut out for this/doesn’t have the chin for this, etc.”

    Those that are “cut out for it” are often greatly consumed by the political process. It is what they eat, sleep and blog. If you think any of the folks named in the last two Fox stories aren’t at work right now with their nose to the grindstone as usual, then you don’t get them–just like the reform groups and media.


  23. - Justice - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 10:12 am:

    Thank goodness the politicians are helping assure their own survival, so they can help make our’s a better state, with adaquate funding and a common sense balanced budget. We simply couldn’t get along without them. Nothing like me first and you second….or third. After all, there are our contributors!

    The staff’s sharing of time to support the legislative process and to assure their boss’s reelection, so they can continue to save us from ourselves, as they are so needed, doesn’t appear to be against the law? If we don’t think it is right, change the rules…..or simply vote them all out.

    Regardless of who carries the message, we should look at what, if anything, needs to be done. I for one wouldn’t want their job with such little pay and long hours. But power is some peoples own reward.


  24. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 10:48 am:

    I wonder if Wogan was surprised when he realized he was the featured staffer on the Republican expose.


  25. - jake - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 10:52 am:

    One thing that would help the situation would be if the House members were elected for four year terms instead of two, so they would not be in perpetual campaign mode. It would make sense if, in any Senate district, you elected the Senator in one cycle, and the House members in the other cycle.


  26. - Corey - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 10:54 am:

    ==I wonder if Wogan was surprised when he realized he was the featured staffer on the Republican expose.==

    Lol.

    Steve Brown said yesterday Placko told him the series was split because it became “unwieldly”. Some split. How are the campaign needs of Dan Burke part of a Republican piece? This was just terrible journalism, all around. There is no defending it.


  27. - Masters Phil - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 11:21 am:

    ==I cannot speak for both staffs. However, I am certain that for at least one of the parties, if not almost certainly both, any political work done off state-time is purely voluntary (voluntary in that involvement is not coerced; the staffers are still paid from political funds). ==

    I was on one of the legislative staffs in the early oughts. Working or not working campaigns was NOT optional. I believe things are different now but back then, particularly issues/policy staff, you worked campaigns when they told you to work a campaign. But again, from what I understand, the coercion aspect is minimal now.


  28. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 11:23 am:

    ===particularly issues/policy staff, you worked campaigns when they told you to work a campaign.===

    Why would anyone want to work on Issues or Policy and not want to work on campaigns?


  29. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 11:23 am:

    Uh, we taxpayers ARE paying for this practice. If these “minions” can jump on and off the state payroll to do political work when ordered, then how important are their state “jobs” to the legislative process?

    This full time/part time/now you see them/now you don’t stuff may be old hat to many of us around here, but it doesn’t make it right, nor will the public buy a lot of comments on this topic posted here and yesterday.

    If these folks are so valuable to the parties, they should become full time staffers of the parties, with benefits, even if it forces the parties to raise more funds to do this.

    The current system allows the parties to keep key people employed in between elections on taxpayer dimes.


  30. - just sayin' - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 11:27 am:

    I do think Cross and the Republicans have been sloppy about keeping a Chinese Wall between the state work and politics. And it’s hard to believe that a $144 thousand dollar a year state worker or whatever is truly doing all of his “side” political work after 5 PM and on weekends.

    Also, Placko said at the end that the Republican staffers keep their state benefits when they move over to campaigns, but that the GOP reimburses the state for that.

    Really? Placko might want to check the D-2’s filed with the State Board of Elections to confirm if that’s true. That expense would have to be listed. If the state is still subsidizing the political work in any way, that’s a crime.

    Overall, good reports by Placko.


  31. - MikeMacD - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 11:30 am:

    “ability to assign armies of state workers”

    34 Democratic and 13 GOP workers, probably in the 20’s and 30’s age range. Mighty puny armies in my opinion.

    Illinois is what, close to 13 Million people?


  32. - Indeedy - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 11:52 am:

    **How are the campaign needs of Dan Burke part of a Republican piece?**

    The same way it’s a Democrat issue when a Republican challenger gets knocked off the ballot in Vernon Hills.

    **Why would anyone want to work on Issues or Policy and not want to work on campaigns?**

    Because they live in Illinois ;-))


  33. - Masters Phil - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 12:18 pm:

    ==Why would anyone want to work on Issues or Policy and not want to work on campaigns? ==

    Rich, I’m not saying an issues/policy staffer wouldn’t want to work on a campaign, I sure did. I’m simply pointing to the previous comment and saying it wasn’t optional. And, it certainly wasn’t optional where you were sent. I suppose looking back, there were many from other areas of staff that didn’t wish to be involved but were “coerced” into campaign work. But again, I don’t think that remains the case today.


  34. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 12:43 pm:

    ==The current system allows the parties to keep key people employed in between elections on taxpayer dimes. ==

    Or it provides employment to good people when they aren’t needed in Springfield.

    Legislative work and campaign work are both seasonal. The system as it is allows these folks to go where the work is.


  35. - Uncle Kurt '86 - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 1:10 pm:

    =Uh, we taxpayers ARE paying for this practice. If these “minions” can jump on and off the state payroll to do political work when ordered, then how important are their state “jobs” to the legislative process?=

    So you are in favor of this efficient way to keep younger employees employed, WHILE NOT EARNING TAX PAYER DOLLARS, at times when the legislature is not in session, and thus saving the state money had the employees not taken leave and continued to receive checks signed by the comptroller???

    Legislative staff is necessary during session. Undisputed. So, I think we can all agree that this practice, at the very least, SAVES the state money.

    Okay, thank you, proceed…


  36. - Boscobud - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 2:12 pm:

    Who pays for there health insurance while they are on leave?

    THE STATE!!!

    Okay, thank you, please proceed….


  37. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 3:08 pm:

    ==Who pays for there health insurance while they are on leave?==

    I believe they have to pay or their employer must pay. I do not think the state pays.


  38. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 3:18 pm:

    === And completely separating politics from the Legislature is a goofy concept. Our democratic system is fundamentally based on campaigns - a basic fact that people like Collins don’t seem to understand. Still, there ought to be a limit.

    What is important here is the power of the leaders. Without that staff, they can’t control their members nearly as well.

    Here’s just one example: People who staff committees answer directly to the leaders, not the chairpersons and minority spokespersons. The leaders appoint the committee chairs. They appoint the committee members. It’s total, absolute control. ===

    I think Rich’s first point is precise. You don’t work in the General Assembly - for either party - if you aren’t passionate about the issues. If you care about what your side is doing, you WANT to be in the majority. You WANT to get your members re-elected.

    Maybe there SHOULD be a limit, but what should it be? Frankly, as far as the leave-of-absence is voluntary — and as far as I know it is — there isn’t a problem.

    To Rich’s second point, atleast on the House Democratic side, its inaccurate to say that staff doesn’t answer to committee chairs or their members. Madigan may sign the paychecks, but your job is to keep the members happy. Unhappy members make the phone ring. Unhappy members are less likely to take a controversial vote. Unhappy members lead to chaos, and everything grinds to a halt.


  39. - Curious - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 3:44 pm:

    Re:- Boscobud - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 2:12 pm:

    “Who pays for there health insurance while they are on leave?

    THE STATE!!!

    Okay, thank you, please proceed….”

    As has already been discussed elsewhere on this site, in the instances cited by Fox News Chicago, the state workers on a leave of absence who are working on Democratic campaigns share the burden of the health insurance premiums with their new employer, not the state. All other benefits that state worker enjoys while on state payroll are suspended while an employee is on leave, which the employee can choose buy back at a later time if they so choose, but only when they are back on the state payroll.

    So in summary, no, the state does not pay for their health insurance while they are on leave doing political work. The worker does, in conjunction with their political employer.


  40. - Boscobud - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 3:47 pm:

    ===I believe they have to pay or their employer must pay. I do not think the state pays.===

    I think there employer is THE STATE. We the tax payers are getting the bill. This is a small part as to why the state is in such debt.


  41. - Bill - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 4:28 pm:

    ==Unhappy members lead to chaos, and everything grinds to a halt.==
    As opposed to what we have now?


  42. - Montrose - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 4:52 pm:

    *To Rich’s second point, atleast on the House Democratic side, its inaccurate to say that staff doesn’t answer to committee chairs or their members. Madigan may sign the paychecks, but your job is to keep the members happy. Unhappy members make the phone ring. Unhappy members are less likely to take a controversial vote. Unhappy members lead to chaos, and everything grinds to a halt.*

    So, members are the customers. That makes sense. Madigan still hires and fires.


  43. - Team Sleep - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 4:55 pm:

    This is as big of a non-issue issue as there is. Exempt public employees at state and federal levels often take leave time or use vacation time to do necessary political work for all sorts of campaigns - be it for their boss or for another candidate. Hiring new staff members to only handle the political aspects may work for some campaigns, but many politicians and party leaders prefer to have their old hands and reliable staffers available for both government and political work. And why shouldn’t they?

    The only reason the split becomes a problems is when coercion exists. But two points arise from the coercion angle. First, how many staffers would claim coercion? Second, is it really coercion when your job is literally on the line?

    If you want to poke holes at one practice, it would be the actions of people like Mr. O’Shea. If you are already a high-level employee, is it really a good idea for a leader such as Tom Cross to “loan” out his top staffer to another entity for “outside” work that, in a roundabout way, will help Tom Cross in the long run? At that point, one could legitimately question a staffer’s true motive as well as question time splits.


  44. - heet101 - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 6:33 pm:

    Boscobud

    You’re wrong. At least as far as the GOP staff is concerned.


  45. - Visual Manager - Wednesday, Feb 24, 10 @ 11:46 pm:

    Fox did flash many names on that report…
    Kinda sad for Fox to pick on those people just to prove that they have no idea what is going on. Read Arrington For Illinois…


  46. - Boscobud - Thursday, Feb 25, 10 @ 6:43 am:

    What a minute…. You mean to tell me that when a state employee leaves to go work on a campaign for a person who gets paid from the state doesn’t get insurance from the state!!!!! What are all you smoking!!!!

    In other words a state rep is having trouble with a election and there party decides to help them by taking employees and taking them off there payroll. Know that employee is going to want health insurance so is this state rep going to pay all or part out of pocket for this person? I don’t think so…… They tax payers are going to pay.

    I just saw a article in the Daily Herald about how some of the state reps offices are behind on paying for there rent in there offices because the state has no money to pay for it. So why won’t the state reps pay for it themselves and ask the state to pay them?


  47. - Curious - Thursday, Feb 25, 10 @ 7:30 am:

    When Fox is picking on and slandering Dorothy Brown, Todd Stoger, Mayor Daley, etc., etc., you people watch it with glee.

    Now that the bullseye is on people YOU know, you have a problem with it.

    What hypocrites.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner issues executive order barring legislators from representing clients at PTAB
* Kennedy: Limit top progressive income tax rate to less than 6 percent
* Question of the day
* Next week's House session cancelled
* *** UPDATED x2 - Pritzker "Did Chris Kennedy Just Endorse Bruce Rauner?" - Kennedy campaign tries to explain *** Kennedy says Rauner "should be applauded" for "trying to do what he thinks is best for the state of Illinois"
* Sen. Donne Trotter retires
* Illinois payrolls were up just 0.5 percent last year
* Vitriol continues in Durkin's primary race
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Judge clears courtroom in Rauner lawsuit hearing
* You can't "fully inform" voters without money
* State agrees to a $400 million consent decree
* Rate Prizker's new online ad
* Rauner gets another property tax press pop
* Emanuel pokes Rauner over Amazon comments
* Rauner's new Pritzker ad cost just $11,900
* Kennedy unveils health care plan
* Gov. Rauner gets his own blog
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* Chuck Sweeny: Governor of Illinois race; follow.....
* Chuck Sweeny: Governor of Illinois race; follow.....
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax a.....
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax a.....
* Minority Leader Brady sees a very tough year tr.....
* Hospitals worry about closures, layoffs as they.....
* 2 Republicans seek 107th state representative seat..
* Ives Beats Rauner in Straw Poll..
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax a.....


* Schools test approach that lets students learn at own pace
* Chicago police shoot man officers say was attacking woman
* Metra fares, service cuts coming in February
* Thousands expected at women's marches across Illinois
* EXCHANGE: Few shelters from cold for suburban homeless
* EXCHANGE: Cannery now handles weddings instead of pumpkins
* Serial stowaway arrested again at Chicago's O'Hare airport
* Former teacher sentenced to prison in child porn case
* Illinois union pioneer Paul Booth dead at 74
* Indiana man gets prison term for selling guns in Illinois

* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax appeals
* Outdoor sports participants hoping for larger cut in farm bill
* U of I trustees approve 4th-straight tuition freeze
* Rauner to air extended ad of Pritzker, Blagojevich on wiretap
* Mendoza to keynote Women's March Saturday in Springfield
* Chicago mayor vows to step up Amazon second headquarters bid
* Under the Dome Podcast: More Blago-Pritzker talk, Rauner confirms Duke is racist
* U of I withdrew 35 job offers after background checks
* Frerichs: Can't get tax break for using college savings plan on private K-12 tuition
* Illinois governor to air extended ad of rival, Blagojevich on wiretap

* What you need to know about the L.A. Times 'frat-boy executive' scandal
* Law firms' 2018 resolution: Less paper
* Could this company become Chicago's own Salesforce?
* Manufacturers discover marketing
* In Chicago, does the new tax law mean a bonus?


* Humboldt Park man charged with December armed robberies
* Baby thrown from balcony in South Shore in serious condition
* Man shot in ankle in Austin drive-by attack
* Woman struck by CTA bus in Old Town
* Chicago Police involved in Gresham shooting
* CX-3 is mighty Mazda crossover
* Police: Target shoplifters fled police, caused crash in Plainfield
* US flu season gets worse, has ‘lot more steam’ than expected
* Chicago rapper Fredo Santana reportedly dead at 27
* Daughter, father seriously hurt in Burnside home fire


* LINDA C. BLACK HOROSCOPES for 1/20/18
* Women will march around the globe today, in show of political force and outrage
* With or without Corey Crawford, end of Blackhawks dynasty looms
* Government shutdown begins, and so does the finger-pointing
* Proposed Topgolf, rec center project could bring hundreds of jobs to Lincolnshire
* Live blog: Latest updates, photos, video from the 2018 Women's March Chicago
* Turkish military begins war against Kurdish forces in north Syria
* Toddler in serious condition after being thrown from balcony on South Side
* Spotlight to focus on women at 24th annual SAG Awards
* Police: Officers shoot man during attack on woman


» Chicago Schools Chief: Cost A Driver In Special Ed Overhaul
» One Year Later, Women’s March Demands More Than Attendance
» State Week: Education Funding, Pritzker-Blagojevich, Rauner-Duke
» Sheriff Offers To Help Review Police Shootings In Suburban Cook County
» A Prescription For Fruits And Veggies: One Solution To Food Insecurity in Illinois
» A Call For Transparency
» 2 Illinois Governor Candidates Spend $26M In Last 3 Months
» State Board of Education: Double School Funding Now
» Lawmakers Demand Fast Internet For Rural Schools
» 2 Dreamers Discuss Helping Other Immigrants Amid Uncertainty


* Ed Rogers: High stakes for Trump at the World Economic Forum
* Scott Reeder: Formula for political success is to listen to voters
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax appeals
* Outdoor sports participants hoping for larger cut in farm bill
* Point: Trump's stance gives hope to an Iranian majority that longs for freedom
* Counterpoint: Trump's assertive policies rally Iranian support for the Ayatollahs
* Thumbs Up: To investing in infrastructure
* Eugene Robinson: An administration with no credibility cannot lead
* U of I trustees approve 4th-straight tuition freeze
* Rauner to air extended ad of Pritzker, Blagojevich on wiretap


* Central Illinoisans feel heard, supported at anti-abortion March for Life
* Police seek ‘person of interest’ in life-threatening battery case
* What you may have missed: Gun violence, MLK march, Celebration fence, governor's race and new DMH facility
* Animal Control boosts adoption efforts, makes local connections
* Gateway Arch, Old Courthouse among sites closed during government shutdown
* State Farm building eyed for other uses
* Southern Illinois farmers see improvements, hope for more under Trump presidency
* What would you do if a nuclear missile was headed our way?
* A fine-feathered mystery
* Area teens to tackle road safety


* Defense wins championships, or at least the NFC title
* Papadakis and Cizeron win 4th straight European gold
* Bucks' Antetokounmpo to miss 2 games to rest sore knee
* The Latest: Danish chef behind Noma thanks Bocuse
* Clark, Kim and changing of guard in Olympic halfpipe

* Dissident artist Ai Weiwei and US Rep. Ran...
* Bipartisan Illinois criticism follows Trum...
* 'Time' Magazine's Powerful Cover Features ...
* Letter: Talk to tax preparer about GOP tax...
* Our view: End patronage at Algonquin Towns...
* Letters to the editor: Election commission...
* Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and...
* Lawmakers back renaming Warrenville post o...
* Teacher raised in Yorkville running agains...
* Suburban Democrats line up to challenge Ro...

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...
* Live updates: Government shutdown - Politi......
* Women's marches protest Donald Trump on an......

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...

* Thank you Sen. Donne Trotter
* Chance The Rapper Visited Uptown Last Night
* “Chicago” West?
* Donald Trump And The Rhetoric Of Dictators
* The Beachwood Radio Sports Hour #184: Bell & Bulls, Vic & Vikes, Corey's Confusion
* Thorner/O'Neil: Social Engineering: Transferring Parental Control of Children to Teachers
* Governor to be featured at bi-partisan Lincoln Forum in January
* 7 members of Illinois Congressional delegation co-sponsor Born Alive measure
* Chicago Ex Fest canceled amid allegations of sexual misconduct against its organizer
* Mom and Dad is a bracing Mad magazine-style satire


* Illinois Awarded Funds to Offer Advanced Training on Detecting Impaired Driving
* Illinois EPA Announces Upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
* IEMA Highlights Emergency Preparedness for People with Access and Functional Needs in May - Ready Illinois website offers preparedness tips for people, caregivers
* First Lady Launches Illinois Family Connects
* Governor and Lt. Governor Unveil 2016 Journal of Local Government Shared Service Best Practices

  
* Portrait Camera App 'Focos' Gains Real Lens Optical Effects and Improved Shooting Mode
* Shell wants to turn smartwatches into smartphones on a wing (or two)
* Gboard goes big on GIF creation in the suggestion bar
* iOS 11 is now on 65 percent of devices
* FCC sees US variants of Nokia 6 (2018) or Nokia 7
* Skagen Falster smartwatches are now available to buy
* Google Play services update fixes Chromecast Wi-Fi bug

* White Sox seeking new flagship radio home
* Engel working to steady barrel in Year 2
* WLS parent company looking to end White Sox radio deal
* Inbox: Who replaces Rodon in the rotation?
* 2018 South Side Sox Hall of Fame Ballot
* With maturity comes lofty expectations for Eloy
* Collins ranked MLB's No. 9 catching prospect


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller