Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rare agreement on guns?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rare agreement on guns?

Wednesday, Apr 17, 2013

* Details matter, but this sure looks like a practical idea on guns

Both sides of the gun-control debate could be headed for a rare agreement at the Statehouse on a push by Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart to get guns out of the hands of felons and the seriously mentally ill.

His plan would require gun owners to surrender their state-issued Firearm Owners Identification Cards within 48 hours of being notified they were ineligible to possess a gun because of being convicted of a felony or domestic violence or being judged mentally ill.

A top gun-rights advocate told the Chicago Sun-Times late Tuesday that his “intuition” was an agreement could be reached on the issue with gun-control supporters.

In Cook County, about 5,000 people have had their state gun permits revoked by the Illinois State Police, making them ineligible to buy weapons. But only about 1,000 have actually turned in the cards, leaving them able to buy ammunition at will, Dart’s office said.

Under the sheriff’s measure, those who had their permits taken away also would have to account for where their weapons would be maintained during the period of time their FOID cards were revoked.

* Meanwhile, John Schmidt defends onetime foe Attorney General Lisa Madigan on her refusal to say whether she’s appealing the appellate court ruling that declares Illinois’ public carry ban unconstitutional

In December I wrote in these pages on why Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan should not appeal the federal appellate court decision throwing out Illinois’ total ban on concealed carry. The Supreme Court decision in the New York case strongly reinforces that conclusion.

The question is one of judicial tactics, not a test of commitment to gun control. A total ban is the least defensible concealed carry law. In his December decision, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Richard Posner said the Illinois ban failed any test of constitutional scrutiny. That conclusion is almost inescapable now that the Illinois total ban is unique in the nation and Illinois crime rates give no support to the argument that the ban has a positive impact in reducing violence.

The positive side of the Supreme Court’s New York decision is that limits on concealed carry may pass constitutional muster. New York’s law requires any gun applicant to show a “special need” for a concealed carry permit and gives the permitting authority to local officials who can respond to differing statewide needs and interests. We don’t know how the appellate court would come out on such a law. In his decision, Posner expressed some reservation about the New York court’s analysis, but he reached no conclusion on whether a New York-type law would be upheld here.

Illinois can now follow New York’s lead and come up with a new law that the General Assembly believes meets Illinois’ particular needs and circumstances. After the New York decision, any reasonably drafted law, short of a total ban, has a real chance of withstanding constitutional challenge.

* And the Tribune editorial board concurs with that last point

So, let’s go. Illinois could live with a concealed-carry law that recognizes local needs and interests. Gov. Pat Quinn and other Democratic leaders have signaled support for that option. The gun lobby doesn’t like the New York template, but it would be interesting to watch pro-gun lawmakers defend a vote to defeat a bill that for the first time establishes concealed carry in Illinois.

The Illinois Legislature is scheduled to adjourn on May 31, nine days before the clock runs out on the appellate court’s grace period. That court could stay its ruling if Illinois appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court. Attorney General Lisa Madigan is wise to delay a decision on whether to appeal until the Legislature acts or doesn’t act.

Bottom line, the wisest course for the Legislature is to act: Pass a “may-issue” concealed carry law that provides local control.

The NRA won’t see the irony. To them, “may carry” might as well be “no carry.” From an ISRA action alert…

URGENT ALERT – YOUR IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED

GUN GRABBERS TRY TO HIJACK CONCEALED CARRY

YOU MUST MAKE PHONE CALLS IMMEDIATELY

Rabid gun grabber Rep. Kelly Cassidy has introduced amendments to HB0831 which hijack the court’s requirement to enact concealed carry and transform concealed carry into gun control.

IT’S IMPORTANT THAT YOU ACT IMMEDIATELY TO HALT CASSIDY’S SCHEME.

Kelly’s vision of concealed carry is absolutely unacceptable to law-abiding citizens. Her proposal contains all sorts of impediments to self defense – the worst of which is that carry licenses would be issues on a “may issue” basis.

UNDER KELLY’S PROPOSAL, YOU WOULD HAVE TO CONVINCE SOME POLITICAL HACK THAT YOUR LIFE IS WORTH DEFENDING.

That’s right, under Kelly Cassidy’s version of “concealed carry,” you would have to go down to your village hall and beg some civil servant for the right to defend yourself and your family from vicious street thugs. Of course, your chances of success will depend greatly on what you look like and how many checks you had written to your local sheriff’s reelection campaign committee.

* From the preamble in Rep. Cassidy’s bill

The Seventh Circuit’s opinion in Moore favorably cited Kachalsky v. County of Westchester, 701 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2012), a recent opinion of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld New York’s law restricting the carrying of firearms in public. New York’s law gives the local issuing authority considerable discretion in deciding whether to issue a license, and has been interpreted to require an applicant for an unrestricted license to demonstrate “a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of the general community”. By favorably citing the Second Circuit’s opinion in Kachalsky, the Seventh Circuit in Moore indicated that it agreed that New York’s requirements are consistent with the Second Amendment.

* From the bill

A sheriff or the [Chicago police superintendent] may submit a recommendation for approval of an application to the Department, if the applicant is an eligible individual under Section 20 who has sufficiently demonstrated, in the judgment of the sheriff or Superintendent, that:

    (1) he or she has a particularized need for the license;
    (2) he or she is a responsible person; and
    (3) the issuance of a license is in the public’s interest.

“Particularized need” is defined in the proposal as meaning that the applicant is “exposed to unusual personal danger, distinct from other members of the community.”

Discuss.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

68 Comments
  1. - Skeeter - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:04 am:

    One quick clarification. The post seems to equate the NRA with the ISRA.

    In my experience, Todd V is a tough negotiator but he’s not prone to making the kind of paranoid press releases that the ISRA does as a matter of routine.

    Those two seem to have very different tactics.

    The ISRA seems intent on scaring off moderates. In contrast, I know Todd has been working hard to pull in moderates and in particular, he’s been working on some Chicago Dems.


  2. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:05 am:

    ===The post seems to equate the NRA with the ISRA.===

    It may not be clear enough, but make no mistake that they are on the same page on this Cassidy bill.


  3. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:07 am:

    But you’re right about Todd. He’s not the sort of guy that folks normally expect of NRA leadership.


  4. - How Ironic - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:07 am:

    I don’t like it. It seems to be a rather onerous method, and one that requires someone to determine ‘if’ your particular situation ‘needs’ to be addressed with a CCW.

    And what happens if the ‘need’ expires…do they come back for your permit? How is that enforced?

    It should be:

    1. Has a valid FOID
    2. Is a responsible person
    3. Attended and passed all required training courses.

    Then issue the permit.

    Otherwise it just seems like a legislative manuver to eliminate citizens from CCW under the guise of ‘may issue’.


  5. - Skeeter - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:09 am:

    One additional point — I’m a huge fan of Kelly Cassidy. Overall, she’s done some great work during her short time in Springfield. She’s been a great voice for freedom and equality.

    But I’m disappointed that she doesn’t seem to value freedom for reasonable people to own guns. Freedom has to have meaning, even if it means freedom to do things that others may not like, as long as nobody else is being harmed.

    I wish she would take a step back and look at whether her position on guns is consistent with her philosophical views on other issues.


  6. - Ghost - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:10 am:

    It makes me uncomfortable when any law has broad discretionary language that is vaguely defined. This “exposed to unusual personal danger” seems like a good way to approve friends and family, so to speak, but not the people you disfavor. it also seems a good way to enocurage “gifts” and political contributions to locals by people hopiong to have there permit approved.

    as we look to move away from corruption a discretionary law like this creates troublesome opportunity for those who give donations to be found to have provided unusual personal danger explanations while those who do not contribute will have their explanation denied.

    We already have problems in small counties with Local officials agreeing to give foid cards back to people convicted of domestic battery (even though they cant have guns under federal law); lack of oversight and uniform application is not empowering, it is unwatched opportunties for abuse and corruption.

    If we want to take this seriously it needs to be a deifned standard with bright and clear definitions applicable to all.


  7. - downstate commissioner - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:18 am:

    Actually, I would probably qualify for the permit, based on what I know about our local sheriff feelings about concealed carry.But if I were a pro-gun legislator, I would probably vote against a may-issue bill AT THIS TIME, in hopes that it would fail, and a shall-issue bill would be offered. The clock is still clicking…


  8. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:21 am:

    First of all the Dart legislation is a very good step read about it in the Trib. I could see a couple tweeks but they are primarily procedural. Such as the amount of time the individual has to transfer the firearms to someone else, what leeway he as a convicted felon is now going to have to transfer, can he sell them, etc. These should be easy to work out. I hope it passes.

    As for the May-issue thing. The problem, and why it won’t be hard for downstate legislators to vote against, is that it will be seen as the Chicago way right now. If you are an Alderman you can carry. If you are a shop owner like Luis Quizhpe then you don’t. If someone really want’s a May-issue then i suggest you junk the Special need language. I think most of us could live with a reasonable may-issue as a fall back position but the NY style is a de facto ban. Don’t forget a vote against this isn’t a vote against CCW since CCW still happens June 9th. If a May-Issue NY style bill was what Chicago wanted they should have attempted to pass it prior to December.


  9. - Ken_in_Aurora - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:30 am:

    ===To them, “may carry” might as well be “no carry.” ===

    I have no doubt that “may carry” legislation will result in SoCal-style CCW here in IL - i.e. no carry in Cook and certain other counties unless you are one of the political elite. I have emphatically requested my legislators vote against any such bill.


  10. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:35 am:

    The NRA called the New York law a de facto ban. I don’t see them changing their minds here.


  11. - Colossus - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:42 am:

    If Mason Born is signing on to this, then I think we’re starting to find a way to move forward on this one.


  12. - AFSCME Steward - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    That should be how


  13. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:46 am:

    Also, aren’ we already practicing local control in some areas of the state? Haven’t some state’s attorneys announced they will not enforce the state’s conceal carry ban? Isn’t that de facto conceal carry?


  14. - Ucster - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:52 am:

    “How Ironic” nails it in his post.


  15. - Amalia - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 11:55 am:

    glad to hear something hopeful on narrowing the ability of those who are dangerous from having guns.

    good luck Kelly.


  16. - low level - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:02 pm:

    @ wordslinger: exactly. The ‘checks to the sheriff’s reelection campaign committees’ or state’s attorneys reelection campaign committees in those areas must be flowing! (directly cited from the “Action Alert”)

    LOL- just when I thought it was safe, the ISRA outdoes itself once again with the hyperbole. Somebody protect me from the press release/action alert writers!


  17. - ronoglesby - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:05 pm:

    May issue will be no issue unless tou are hooked up. Rahm’s brother would get a permit but my brother would be said to not have enough ‘need’.

    Sorry any more areas for favors and corruption in this state is Not a good thing.


  18. - Steve - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:18 pm:

    What will be interesting is if the final Illinois bill allows significant local control. We could have a situation where suburbanites get the green light to carry from a suburban police chief and these suburbanites work in the Loop. While Chicago residents are denied the right to carry by and large because they haven’t made a campaign contribution.


  19. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:22 pm:

    –get the green light to carry from a suburban police chief and these suburbanites work in the Loop. –

    How many businesses and office buildings in the Loop are going to allow conceal carry within their walls? My guess is somewhere close to zero.


  20. - Happy Returns - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:25 pm:

    Unconstitutional. Violates 14th Amendment.

    (’What? That’s not what they mean by ‘equal protection’?! )


  21. - Mongo - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:31 pm:

    Rono…you have no faith in the guy near you that you voted for or against, in your own community? The whole point of local government is that it is local. The cynicism without any evidence does not help.

    After the NY decision, everyone should have seen this coming.

    Stop blasting, start compromising.

    And ditto to Low Level…I just about sprayed my coffee when I read the ISRA alert. Gee that really helps get the moderates on your side.


  22. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:38 pm:

    Colossus

    Didn’t know i was the sounding board here but okay. I think if you read the trib article that the NRA is on board for the Dart proposal. This is the kind of thing that should have been done when the FOID was first established.


  23. - Steve - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:43 pm:

    Wordslinger:

    Police officers carry handguns in many of those buildings , so what’s the big deal??? Does that mean the police can’t go into those buildings? I don’t feel unsafe when I eat in a Chicago restaurant and see Chicago police officers carrying guns. But, you are right: any property owner has a basic right to deny someone on their property. So if XWZ company doesn’t want gun owners on their property : that’s their right.


  24. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:47 pm:

    –Police officers carry handguns in many of those buildings , so what’s the big deal–

    That’s not a serious question, is it? I’m pretty sure, under the law, you can’t prevent a police officer from carrying their service weapon. They’re delegated all sorts of responsibilities, under the law.

    I believe the legislation under consideration allows property owners to prevent guns on their property.


  25. - ronoglesby - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:53 pm:

    @word

    Actually you are thinking big buildings, hundreds of smaller offices like my old ome would allow it. Talk about cramming everyone into one size fits all. He had a valid point you failed to address.


  26. - Realist - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 12:59 pm:

    Word, officers are not allowed to carry their service weapons into capitol buildings (even Stratton), security guards in private buildings might be able to prevent them in non-emergency cases.


  27. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:00 pm:

    –He had a valid point you failed to address.–

    What am I missing? The police are delegated all sorts of authority under the law the average person does not have.


  28. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:03 pm:

    –Word, officers are not allowed to carry their service weapons into capitol buildings (even Stratton)–

    I did not know that, thanks. I have seen baliffs requiring police officers to check their weapons before entering courtrooms.

    – security guards in private buildings might be able to prevent them in non-emergency cases. –

    I don’t know about that, but if I were a security guard, I probably wouldn’t try it.


  29. - John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:13 pm:

    Skeeter:
    This is why I hold my nose when voting.

    Cassidy holds civil rights dear and close to her heart, whether they are real or contrived, as long as they are the civil rights that she likes.

    To Cassidy, people have no right to self-defense with firearms. She willingly supports people outside of her district who feel the same way.

    http://new.livestream.com/blueroomstream/events/2019771/videos/16080680


  30. - Amalia - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:25 pm:

    “It’s easy to get around background checks. All you gotta do is tell immigration you’re a gun.”

    Jon Stewart on The Daily Show about immigration and gun issues.


  31. - Ggal - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:34 pm:

    this may be an insignificant question to the discussion, but who is the authority that judges who is mentally ill? This is about the Dart proposal.


  32. - 332bill - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:39 pm:

    Anybody else notice that the live fire portion of Cassidy’s bill doesn’t require you hit anything.


  33. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:42 pm:

    ggal

    I think that that is an action taken by a court. I may be incorrect.


  34. - Todd - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:45 pm:

    Couple of things, it is not just a may issue but may issue squared.so you have to get permission from the locals, then the state police have MAY issue on top of it.

    Add that there is no preemption,so on top of may issue, Oak Park makes it illegal to do anything more than step off the sidewalk.

    This isnt a carry law its a no carry law


  35. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:52 pm:

    Todd

    Question how does the landscape look, are we going to see anything before end of session? I am assume that the Cassidy bill is DOA?

    I started reading that thing looks like she had VPC write it. Talk about going to the extremes.


  36. - Amalia - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:54 pm:

    todd defines Kelly’s bill as may issue squared. how does he define the NY bill just refused review by the US Supremes?


  37. - John Boch - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:56 pm:

    This is nothing more than just the latest effort to saddle Illinoisans with an ineffective “may issue” bill.

    History has proven that “May Issue” firearms carry permit laws are widely subject to abuse, corruption, racial bigotry, and un-equal application based upon the whims of government officials

    Supporters of gun control don’t have the votes to pass “may issue”. If the votes were there, Speaker Madigan would have already gotten it through the House and on to the Senate.

    The bottom line: The National Rifle Association, the Illinois State Rifle Association and Guns Save Life have the votes to pass a shall-issue bill through the House if it were called by the Speaker and given an up or down vote.

    We also have the votes to stop “may issue” bills.

    Absent a true “shall issue” bill being signed into law before June 9th, we’ll be practicing unregulated “Constitutional Carry”. All the caterwauling in the world isn’t going to change that.

    John


  38. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 1:59 pm:

    @John:

    Actually John you’ll be subject to all sorts of varied local ordinances regarding carry and it will once again get mired in the courts. If you think you’ll just be able to strap on a gun and walk around you are wrong. It will be messy so I suggest everybody work something out. Enough with the arrogance from people.


  39. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:00 pm:

    John

    Same questions i asked Todd. Any hope for a bill prior to end of session? Seems like the closer they get to the deadline the less the do. Oh wait i forgot for a second what state i was in.


  40. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:03 pm:

    Demo

    Does that apply to MJM? That seems to be the holdup and the source of arrogance.


  41. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:07 pm:

    MB, if Brandon truly had the votes he’d have run his bill by now. Stop whining.


  42. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:10 pm:

    @Mason:

    It applies to everybody. All of you need to stop with the finger pointing. And if you don’t think your side is just as arrogant then you have blinders on. And I hate to tell you but things like that ISRA garbage don’t endear those of us who are reasonable and rational to the cause. Both sides need to get a handle on this kind of nonsense.


  43. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:10 pm:

    That was me above


  44. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:17 pm:

    Demo

    I agree with you on the stupidity of the little alerts. I usually Trash can them as soon as i see them. I can agree that a reasonable bill is preferable to no bill. However the reasonable bill is being ignored while we go through a political dog and pony show. There is room in the Phelps bill for negotiation yet only one side “appears” to be at the table. Now it could be that there are talks i am not aware of. On the outside here this looks more like a political bomb throwing match then an attempt to reach an agreement. Of course maybe this is par for the course here in IL.


  45. - Todd - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:21 pm:

    Amila– i consider the new york law a bad law.

    The court decision from the second doesn’t really impact the rulling of the 7th

    The Suprems didnt issue an opinion, they just didnt take the case. We are still under the order to pass a bill.


  46. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:24 pm:

    @Mason:

    I have no illusions as far as the process. And I honestly couldn’t tell you what the sausage will look like once it comes out of the grinder (if it ever gets out). All I can say is that the loudest talkers are the extremists and those groups aren’t going to agree on anything. I would hope that there are discussions by people who have their heads on straight going on behind the scenes. All I know is that it’s going to be really messy if there isn’t a bill in June because you are going to have some people who think they can sling a gun on their belt and go on their way and I guarantee you there will be others waiting to arrest those people. It will be nasty.


  47. - Downstate Illinois - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:36 pm:

    The Cassidy bill says my right to self-defense is limited to what the sheriff will allow. That would likely violate the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guaranteeing equal protection under the law. Take someone like Sheriff Dart in Chicago who has flagrantly ignored laws he doesn’t like if he thinks it will help his re-election chances.

    From an ethical standpoint it creates an opportunity for corruption that less than ethical policitians will exploit. Considering that Gallatin County just sent its last sheriff to jail for selling drugs out of the evidence room, it’s a legitimate concern.

    I don’t need a license for the First Amendment and I certainly don’t need a permission slip for the Second.


  48. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 2:45 pm:

    ==I don’t need a license for the First Amendment and I certainly don’t need a permission slip for the Second. ==

    Actually sometimes you do need a license for the 1st Amendment (permits to gather, press credentials, etc.). And you actually do need permission for the 2nd (in the form of background checks, FOID card, etc.). Don’t get me wrong, I think the bill is dumb. But I don’t like these arguments about absolutes. There are no absolute rights. I don’t know of one that doesn’t have a caveat associated with it.


  49. - FormerParatrooper - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 3:17 pm:

    With what Scalia said in the McDonald case, Chicago residents could cite as a “special need”. He spoke of the crime rate, the call for National Hairs troops to patrol city from Alderman, seems that a cut paste of the decision should be suffice. Yes, a bit tongue in cheek on my part, but worth thinking about in the context of the proposal.


  50. - FormerParatrooper - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 3:19 pm:

    Gaurd not hairs….on my mobile here.


  51. - titan - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 3:21 pm:

    ===(1) he or she has a particularized need for the license;===

    In other words, he is a politically connected person. That’s just dandy. I suspect I could probably wrangle one out of my locals…but if one is subject to a patchwork maze of local control restrictions, it would be a complete cluster****


  52. - Amalia - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 3:26 pm:

    @Todd, you say the NY law is bad, but I wonder is it not as bad as Kelly’s bill?


  53. - Todd - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 3:56 pm:

    Hb831 failed with only 31 votes.

    I told you they didn’t have the votes


  54. - reelpro - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 4:02 pm:

    Outstanding, what is next?


  55. - Mason born - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 4:04 pm:

    Todd

    well done. Maybe now we can actually try to accomplish something.


  56. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 4:08 pm:

    Downstate Illinois: “From an ethical standpoint it creates an opportunity for corruption that less than ethical policitians will exploit.”

    Like secret-money PACs?


  57. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 4:14 pm:

    ronoglesby: “May issue will be no issue unless tou are hooked up. Rahm’s brother would get a permit but my brother would be said to not have enough ‘need’.”

    Except for the fact that Rahm’s brothers are not citizens of the state of Illinois. However, had Toomey-Manchin passed the US Senate & then the House & then been signed into law by President Obama, Zeke & Ari could’ve gotten permits in other states and used them in Illinois.


  58. - Mr. Wonderful - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 4:22 pm:

    Toddster - good to see that Cassidy bill go down so bad. Senate rejects background check red herring. A great day for the good guys!


  59. - Ken_in_Aurora - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 4:49 pm:

    === Hb831 failed with only 31 votes. ===

    A good end to a bad bill.


  60. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 5:00 pm:

    Is that an act from Rep. Bost or the real deal? He’s going to give his you tube record a run.


  61. - Mental Health Practitioner - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 5:05 pm:

    It is not practical to expect someone who has been adjudicated mentally ill to turn over their weapons and FOID card. Someone who is that seriously mentally ill is either already in the hospital or taken from the court room to the hospital. The law should be written giving the authorities the ability to go to their homes and take the weapons and card. Otherwise the onus is placed upon family members (if there are any) who may or may not have a FOID card much less the education or comfort level to deal with this problem.


  62. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 5:29 pm:

    @Mr. Wonderful:

    So everybody that disagrees with you is a bad guy? I think the Senate thing is ridiculous. The fact that the gun supporters (I don’t classify myself as either a supporter or an opponent) cannot even support background checks makes me shake my head in disgust. Reason has once again gone right out the door. You can give me all of the malarky you want about the “list” but its bull. Bottom line - the extremists won on this one.


  63. - Norseman - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 5:34 pm:

    Word, I’d say one part “act,” one part “real deal” and two parts “minority party frustration.” Designated floor spokesmen feel they have to be animated for effect. Bill Black gave us some great tirades. If you were watching the floor or on the web, he provided extra colors to enhance your viewing experience.


  64. - Amalia - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 5:48 pm:

    God bless Mark Kirk for voting for the background check bill. How that mild background check bill was not palatable to Senators is beyond me. and it got a majority of the U.S. Senate, just not 60 votes, so the majority of people in this country don’t get what they want.


  65. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 5:57 pm:

    Norseman, thanks. In this case, his side won big and he was still howling. I thought that was a bit odd.


  66. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 5:59 pm:

    @MHP
    But the ISRA will scream “CONFISCATION!#$@%^&*”


  67. - RNUG - Wednesday, Apr 17, 13 @ 9:34 pm:

    Mental Health Practitioner @ 5:05 pm:

    While I agrere with the thought and purpose, I would prefer the law require either the next of kin or the person with power of attorney for the health and well being of the “mentally ill” person be the one required to properly deal with it. I have no problem with law enforcement visiting that person to be sure the law is complied with. If there is no designated responsible person, I would prefer a court assign a relative to be the responsible person for that purpose.


  68. - the Patriot - Thursday, Apr 18, 13 @ 8:24 am:

    It is not possible to get ISP, local law enforcement, courts, and mental health records in a searchable format without spending tens of millions and over several years.

    The reality is that all of these issues are no longer going to be dictated by what is right and reasonable, but what we can or cannot afford. If you don’t like it, vote for republican next time.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Amazon HQ2 site list unveiled
* Out of sight out of mind?
* Frerichs tries to use state investments to prod Facebook into cleaning up its act
* The rise of the billionaire governors
* Camelot promises to grow lottery sales by 40 percent
* Munger tries to defend Rauner veto of Debt Transparency Act
* Rauner: "I can’t comment on any business disputes"
* Question of the day
* Rauner finally takes a stand on a federal issue
* Moody's says "political backlash" against pop tax could make other tax hikes more difficult
* Report: Amazon subsidy could add up to $2 billion
* *** UPDATED x1 *** 10,800 jobs lost in a single month, but Illinois media barely notices
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* MLB open thread
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* WASHINGTON: Illinois needs a voter revolt..
* Editorial: Who’s opposed to transparent, fiscal.....
* EDITORIAL: 3 chances for Legislature to put thi.....
* Rich Miller: Pritzker leads every region of state..
* More questions than answers in announced Illino.....
* Rauner outlines $200 million in cuts to state b.....
* EDITORIAL: 3 chances for Legislature to put thi.....
* Rauner outlines $200 million in cuts to Illinoi.....
* Rauner outlines $200 million in cuts to Illinoi.....


* Group works to reopen Civil War museum in Illinois
* Rauner outlines $200 million in cuts to Illinois budget
* Rosemont police calls Jenkins' death "sad," an accident
* 2nd school forfeits football game at Chicago due to safety
* 2nd school forfeits football game at Chicago due to safety
* Medical students in limbo as young immigrant program ends
* Federal government to keep $20K after Yellowstone drug bust
* Steelmaker moving HQ from Chicago-area to Alabama city
* Steelmaker moving HQ from Chicago-area to Alabama city
* Illinois teachers can get tax credit for buying supplies

* Illinois Lottery's new manager projects $4B in sales
* UIS students could study at newly proposed Chicago research center
* Aaron Schock attorneys contest federal claims on misstatements
* Under the Dome Podcast: Will lawmakers address gun control during the veto session?
* Chicago lawyer announces bid for Illinois attorney general
* Illinois borrows $1.5B at reduced interest to pay down debt
* Rauner cuts human services, other area in state budget
* Pritzker makes list of richest Americans; Rauner releases tax returns
* Pritzker makes list of richest Americans; Gov. Rauner doesn't
* Pritzker makes list of richest Americans, Gov. Rauner doesn't

* The biggest Chicago-area building sales
* Emanuel's challenges are far from over
* Clarification
* Outrage followed by nothing. It's a familiar cycle in Chicago.
* Boeing bets on pilotless planes


* Theo on Cubs’ 3-year run, challenges ahead: ‘Mission not accomplished’
* Man charged with dealing drugs in northwest suburbs
* Uncharacteristically physical ‘energy line’ gives Hawks a boost
* EDITORIAL: 3 chances for Legislature to put things right
* Man, 2 teens charged with NW suburban burglary, suspected of more
* SNEED: Long career draws memories of encounters with creepy men
* Bears vs. Panthers — What to Watch 4
* Man shot in leg in Englewood
* A month later, Puerto Rico still struggling to get electricity back
* MITCHELL: Time to call domestic violence what it is


* For Cubs, once may not be enough, but twice had better hurry
* 2nd school forfeits football game vs. Hope; 'Maybe we're not reading same Bible'
* Game of the Week: Bolingbrook vs. Lincoln-Way East
* Live from State Street, 'SNL' exhibit delivers laughs, lore
* Kenneka Jenkins' death photos 'raise more questions,' lawyer says as police close case
* 3 men charged in shooting after white nationalist Richard Spencer's speech in Florida
* As Cubs fans mourn, a Sox bar flies the 'L'
* Trump: Considering Powell and Taylor for Federal Reserve's top 2 posts
* Woman injured in Willowbrook explosions, three other fires reported
* After being assailed by Kelly, Rep. Wilson says White House full of 'white supremacists'


» Lawmaker Says Facebook Refuses To Fact Check Ads
» State Week: Chasing Amazon, Bonding Debt
» Teaching Kids To ‘Say Something’ In An Era of School Shootings
» Illinois Issues: Cities Lose Out On Retail Tax As Online Shopping Booms
» What Could Hurt Chicago’s Bid For Amazon’s HQ2?
» At CPS, More Special Education Dollars Go To White, Wealthier Students
» Illinois Bond Sale To Help Pay $16bn Debts
» Mayor To Propose Higher Prices For Ridesharing, Big Concerts
» WBEZ Investigation: CPS Secretly Overhauled Special Education At Students’ Expense
» How's The Illinois Economy? For Rauner Administration, Depends On The Audience


* Illinois Lottery's new manager projects $4B in sales
* Counterpoint: Updating antiquated systems will open door to transparency
* Point: Taxpayers deserve a better look at the state’s bills
* Thumbs Up: To recent acts of kindness in Springfield
* Eugene Robinson: Trump's the one who didn't know 'what he was signing up for'
* UIS students could study at newly proposed Chicago research center
* Aaron Schock attorneys contest federal claims on misstatements
* Illinois Trial Lawyers Association: U.S. Chamber Poll is another attack on the rights of Illinois citizens
* Marc A. Thiessen: The GOP's bump-stock cop-out
* Kathleen Parker: #MeToo: Tipping point, or outrage du jour?


* High school football scoreboard: Oct. 20-21, 2017
* Live updates: Friday Night Tweets 2017
* Group works to reopen Civil War museum in Illinois
* 8-vehicle crash on I-57 injures 2, closes southbound lanes at Illinois 15 for 2.5 hours
* Rock Island County Clerk expands genealogical services
* Rauner administration outlines more than $200M in cuts from Illinois budget
* HS Football: Monticello vs St. Joe
* Legendary Carbondale bagel business for sale for $3,500 on Craigslist
* Five at 5: Lawmakers mull gun control bills and 4 other stories you should see
* These historic Belleville homes were crumbling. Now neighborhood has a ‘little renaissance.’


* Arlington Heights couple continues Halloween tradition despite illness
* Naperville's North Central names 'stellar' science facility for alum Wentz
* Firefighters rescue two injured workers from Elgin trench
* Gasoline leak into sewers causes Willowbrook explosions, house fires
* Northwestern's Davis embraces the volleyball challenge in Big Ten

* Democratic 14th Congressional District can...
* GOP congressmen say Rauner 'let down' Illi...
* Bipartisan group of lawmakers pushes job t...
* Hundreds of high school students tour Smit...
* Naperville's Lauren Underwood to run for R...
* Helsinki Commission urges Erdogan to end p...
* Few Illinois pols seem eager to back Chica...
* Rival: Kinzinger not conservative - MyWebT...
* Dissident artist Ai Weiwei and US Rep. Ran...
* Hultgren 'disappointed' about potential re...

* Rock Island gets $971183 in federal grants......
* Decatur to get $1.2 million in federal hou......

* Rock Island gets $971183 in federal grants......
* Peoria, Pekin to receive federal housing g......

* Chicago Design Week’s best events
* Illinois teacher retirees: What the hell is Walgreen’s up to?
* Raimondo and Rahm make an offer to Amazon. It’s a secret.
* Will Third Time Be The Charm For 4537 N. Clark?
* The Chicago Trib’s scab columnist John Kass calls me a fanatic.
* Hitting Left with the Klonsky Brothers episode #37. Charles Thomas.
* Live From the Green Mill... It's Saturday Night!
* Forgotten Chicago Talks About Chicago's Arcade History, Saturday At The Bezazian
* Positive Loitering At Wilson/Broadway Tonight 6PM - 7PM
* How The Florida Project works wonders with cinematic time


* Illinois Awarded Funds to Offer Advanced Training on Detecting Impaired Driving
* Illinois EPA Announces Upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
* IEMA Highlights Emergency Preparedness for People with Access and Functional Needs in May - Ready Illinois website offers preparedness tips for people, caregivers
* First Lady Launches Illinois Family Connects
* Governor and Lt. Governor Unveil 2016 Journal of Local Government Shared Service Best Practices

  
* Better pictures of OnePlus 5T leak with 2:1 display in clear view
* Made for Google accessory makers called out on special page
* TouchArcade iOS Gaming Roundup: Campfire Cooking, Guns Royale, Warhammer Quest 2, and More
* Apple Hires Former Amazon Studios Exec to Lead International TV Development
* Huawei Mate 10 Pro camera matches DxOMark record for stills, shy of Pixel 2 overall
* MacRumors Giveaway: Win an InvisibleShield Glass+ Screen Protector for iPhone 7/8 From Zagg
* New Mate, New Axon, New BlackBerry ft. CrackBerry Kevin | #PNWeekly 275 (LIVE at 3pm ET)

* Avisail sees similarities in rebuild, stellar year
* White Sox Arizona Fall League overview
* Ron Gardenhire’s second chance back in AL Central
* Jimenez among prospects in winter leagues
* The five longest White Sox home runs of 2017
* We may as well talk radical realignment
* Adolfo 'grew up,' hit his stride in 2017


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller