Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Today’s number: $1 billion
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Today’s number: $1 billion

Wednesday, Feb 25, 2015

* Jake Griffin takes a look at the optional municipal sales tax add-on, which raised nearly $1 billion for local governments last year above and beyond their share of the state sales tax

Last year, 296 towns imposed a sales tax on top of the state’s 6.25 percent, Illinois Department of Revenue data show. That’s up from 185 towns eight years ago. And elected officials in 173 of those towns have the authority to raise sales tax rates without asking voters for permission. […]

Increasing the sales tax rate is a much “easier sell” than raising property taxes because sales taxes are charged to nonresidents as well, Sagona said. That’s why municipal sales taxes have become increasingly popular and local governments haven’t been shy about increasing rates.

Money raised by municipal sales taxes has risen 51.8 percent since 2006, while the amount all Illinois towns receive from a separate 1 percent share of the state’s sales tax has increased just 11.9 percent, according to the revenue department figures.

The extra municipal sales taxes represent 22 percent of the $4.7 billion in total sales taxes paid to counties, all Illinois municipalities, the Regional Transportation Authority and a few other local government entities in 2014. […]

From 2006 to 2014, the number of towns charging home-rule sales taxes increased from 134 to 173. But the highest growth came in the form of voter-approved municipal sales taxes, which were charged in 123 towns last year, up from 51 in 2006.

The point of the story is some local governments may look at that sales tax as a way to cushion the blow of the governor’s proposed budget cuts. Then again, plenty of towns are already maxing out on the tax.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

22 Comments
  1. - A guy - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 9:52 am:

    Yep.


  2. - DuPage - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 9:57 am:

    Some towns will put on more sales tax, along with other revenue increases, and blame it on the state. This gives them cover, and they will probably raise more then what they lose from the state.


  3. - Mittuns - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 9:59 am:

    Of course they have, they need more tax money to make up for all of the property tax revenue they’ve doled out via TIFs to the Wal-Marts of the world.


  4. - PublicServant - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 10:04 am:

    I wouldn’t count on local governments letting Rauner off the hook as far as raising taxes is concerned. I’m sure they’re appreciative of him attempting to put them on the spot. I’m sure they’re just kicking back and thinking that raising the local sales tax is a good idea. uh hum sure…

    And thanks A Guy for the informative comment. Appreciate that.


  5. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 10:04 am:

    Not a surprise.

    Finding new sources of tax revenue and ensuring that existing taxes do no harm is basic good government.

    I believe that all municipalities should consider all tax revenues, ensuring that their government services are never endangered. Promises unmet are worse than no promises. Depending upon only a few sources of tax income jeopardizes the long term sustainability of a government.

    Anti-tax citizens are not cheap. They are anti-tax when they do not see value for their taxes. When governments are ran badly, they fail to provide value. Lowering taxes to satisfy citizens angry over their taxes, doesn’t solve this problem. Citizens value good government and will pay taxes up to the point where they see value for their taxes.


  6. - Mouthy - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 10:29 am:

    Is Springfield the champ?


  7. - Anonin' - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 10:34 am:

    So BVR wants to freeze real estate taxes and hack the income tax and get the locals to raise sales tax….shrewd, veryyyyyyy shrewd


  8. - RNUG - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 10:42 am:

    == Is Springfield the champ? ==

    Nope. Springfield is 8.5% total; highest listed in Illinois is 9.75% total. Lots of cities at 9% or higher.


  9. - RNUG - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 10:59 am:

    == Citizens value good government and will pay taxes up to the point where they see value for their taxes. ==

    I would expand that to say, based on when I lived in Chicago, that citizens will even accept a certain level of “corruption tax” IF they receive the expected level of services.


  10. - Mouthy - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 11:08 am:

    Thanks RNUG. If it takes voter approval to increase property taxes and city counsels such as Springfield can increase the taxes themselves, is it any wonder why sales tax increases are so popular..


  11. - A guy - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 11:09 am:

    Agreed RNUG. In some measure those same citizens become part in parcel part of the corruption in some manner. It’s not corruption tax. It’s corruption dues.


  12. - Out Here In The Middle - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 11:21 am:

    As a non-resident increased use of municipal sales taxes are a great reason to have UPS deliver my purchases . . . .


  13. - RNUG - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 11:27 am:

    == corruption dues ==

    Thought the PC term these days was “user fees”.


  14. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 11:37 am:

    ===Thought the PC term these days was “user fees”. ===

    No, think “right to work.” The word “dues” makes more sense.

    lol


  15. - Helpful Hardware Man - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 11:40 am:

    Is Amazon required to collect local sales taxes depending on the residency of its customers?


  16. - Cheswick - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 12:14 pm:

    == s Amazon required to collect local sales taxes depending on the residency of its customers? ==

    State only, so far (6.25%).


  17. - Nilwood - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 1:43 pm:

    We shop sales tax rates like other bargain hunters do other prices. Saved $650+ on a recent van purchase on sales taxes alone. It does add up pretty quick.


  18. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 1:45 pm:

    === Saved $650+ on a recent van purchase on sales taxes alone===

    Not unless you broke the law. Your vehicle sales tax is based on where you live, not where you buy.


  19. - Nilwood - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 1:58 pm:

    Nilwood doesn’t have local sales taxes. Spfd dealers insisted that they have to collect them.


  20. - A guy - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 2:12 pm:

    Go register that car without proof of paying sales tax. Get back to us.


  21. - Nilwood - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 2:23 pm:

    We paid the state tax, just not local taxes.


  22. - A guy - Wednesday, Feb 25, 15 @ 4:04 pm:

    If you have no local or county tax as a component of your sales tax, then you paid precisely what was due.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* State Journal-Register endorses Rauner "with reservations"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Pritzker campaign lawyer hints at defamation suit, claims campaign was never served
* Rauner says he's "trying to eradicate" the Madigan machine "cancer," but the "treatments are tough"
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Speaker Ryan to campaign for Davis *** Trump likely coming to Illinois to boost Bost
* Musical Interlude: Try (just a little bit harder)
* Tell me another fairytale, Grandpa
* Rauner again denies any delays at Quincy veterans' home
* "Speed dating" candidates
* Lawyer won't answer simple questions as some anonymous former Pritzker staffers speak out
* AFL-CIO launches "massive" digital ad buy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller