Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rauner on Dunkin’s loss
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rauner on Dunkin’s loss

Tuesday, Apr 19, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From the Morris Herald

Pointing out how critical it will be for Republicans to win seats in the upcoming election, Rauner referred to the contentious March primary race in which state Rep. Ken Dunkin, D-Chicago, lost his seat.

He said Dunkin lost because he didn’t show up in Springfield for a potential veto override of a Madigan-backed bill designed to limit the governor’s control in negotiating with state employee unions.

“We were able to get one Democrat off of the override, so my veto stood,” Rauner said. “But the Democrat leadership got so cranky … they took him out of the primary. This is the Chicago machine power that we’re dealing with.”

Dunkin also missed another vote that day, to fund the state’s child care assistance program. In the end, nobody but Rauner stood up for him, which was telling.

* Related…

* Rauner ally Dunkin has $1.2M in campaign fund — what will he do with it?: Dunkin did not return phone messages Monday and was listed as an excused absence at the Capitol.

* In Defeat, State Rep. Ken Dunkin Kept A Million-dollar Consolation Prize: “It’s very unusual,” says Kent Redfield, a retired political science professor and a longtime observer of money in Illinois politics. “People are going to speculate as to exactly what was going on,” says Redfield. “Was there an arrangement? Is this a golden parachute?”

       

51 Comments
  1. - Ghost - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:10 pm:

    What about Rauners teac to Sam McCann? is that the RUnerite machine power (failing) we are seeing?


  2. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:13 pm:

    Ken Dunkin is no George Bailey…

    ===In the end, nobody but Rauner stood up for him, which was telling.===

    That’s more than Dunkin’s legacy in the GA, it’s an indictment on Dunkin, his character, and the affirmation of what the Century Club wins (3 of them) actually mean.

    Dunkin’s nothing now, the $1.2 million notwithstanding.


  3. - cdog - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:18 pm:

    Will anything come of the early voting shenanigans in Dunkin’s district?


  4. - Gooner - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:26 pm:

    “The Democrat leadership”?

    Rauner has gone from a smart guy to just another right winger reciting his points.

    Disappointing.


  5. - cdog - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:29 pm:

    From the last link –
    “Between dark money and regular political donations, groups aligned with Rauner’s agenda have put together more than $46 million. The donors—those that have been disclosed—are from just nine households.”

    That’s scary.

    After all the nonsense, Stratton will be so much better for that district.

    A work horse is always better than a show horse, especially when work is involved.


  6. - Mama - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:31 pm:

    “Was there an arrangement?”
    I think ‘an arrangement’ is a given.


  7. - Beaner - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:31 pm:

    Attorney’s will be expensive to splain to the election board givin’ people cash for their vote is totally okee-dokey. These are not casual complaints, they are on freakin’ video, and the sound and visual quality are good.
    Inquiring minds just have one question for Dunkin:
    Do you prefer an upper or lower bunk?


  8. - Great Caesar's Ghost! - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:32 pm:

    Apparently the Rauner Machine still has a lot to learn.

    Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Whose the Crankiest One of All … I vote for Rauner.


  9. - Annonin' - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:39 pm:

    Did BigBrain talk about who really control Dunkin’ checkin’ account? Dunk/M* or BigBrains?


  10. - Mouthy - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:39 pm:

    One thing for sure. Nobody’s gonna ask him to return it.


  11. - Bee - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:42 pm:

    “But the Democrat leadership got so cranky … they took him out of the primary. This is the Chicago machine power that we’re dealing with.”

    Maybe just semantics but, they took him out in the primary. They didn’t take him out of the primary.


  12. - JS Mill - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:47 pm:

    You would think that a Dartmouth and Harvard graduate would understand words better.

    His hypocrisy is maddening.


  13. - Wensicia - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:48 pm:

    “But the Democrat leadership got so cranky … they took him out of the primary.”

    The voters took him out during the primary, despite the $1 million plus contribution by Rauner supporters. Who’s cranky now?


  14. - The Captain - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:52 pm:

    Elections with a 36 point margin aren’t decided by leaders, superpacs, money, campaign tricks or insiders, they’re decided by voters. Decisively so.


  15. - Anon - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 3:57 pm:

    Except that Rauner claims that the tax paying voters lost Dunkin’s race. Always nice to see how dark money respects voters.


  16. - Chicago Cynic - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:06 pm:

    Golden Parachute! Kudos to Kent. I really struggled yesterday to come up with a euphemism for payoff. Well done Kent!


  17. - MSIX - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:06 pm:

    =“We were able to get one Democrat off of the override, so my veto stood,” Rauner said.=

    Considering Dunkin has a cool mil now, does this statement by The Bruce not smell a lot like…um, something not kosher?


  18. - Precinct Captain - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:09 pm:

    Is it fair to say Bruce got “cranky” with Sam McCann?


  19. - Former Downstater - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:10 pm:

    Excused absence on Monday for Dunkin? Not surprising since I saw him in South Beach Sunday afternoon.


  20. - The Way I See It - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:10 pm:

    The quote by MSIX is telling. There was a deal, not just a scheduling conflict with a trip for the kids. Everyone knew it, but there it is ….


  21. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:16 pm:

    Um, does the Governor recall the Sam McCann race? Seems to be some similarities there don’t ya think? I guess because he was the one being cranky it was ok?


  22. - Jack Stephens - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:17 pm:

    Since you dont have email Bruce, hope you see this here.

    You were NOT elected for a massive expansion of the Wealthy Welfare state. In fact, you never said anything you stood for other than Pat Quinn is bad. You have no mandate. Your time here is finished.

    Love,
    Jack


  23. - Just saying... - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:36 pm:

    Rauner to the GOP Caucus…”We’re still winning - stick with me…don’t worry about the revolts in your districts…ummm trust me, it’ll be ok…I never lose”…
    Geesh!


  24. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:37 pm:

    Can you imagine what Rauner is going to be like in his last year and/or last couple months in office? GA might as well take all of that time off unless the GOP members are in full revolt by then.


  25. - One to the Dome - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:43 pm:

    I’m sure Rauner would be cranky if MCCann’s opponent ended up with a $1million windfall after losing. I am also sure there are a few of the GOP rank and file members a little cranky too since their allies funded a opposing party’s candidate and then he kept it.


  26. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 4:44 pm:

    –“Was there an arrangement?”–

    No, I’m sure a great humanitarian like Dan Proft was thrilled to give up control of $1.3 million to Ken Dunkin because he admires his fiscal acuity.

    The secretive types who gave the money to Proft — I’m sure they had nothing to do with it. They’re too shy to assert themselves like that. That’s why they’re secret.

    And they talk about a corrupt Chicago machine….


  27. - @MisterJayEm - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:06 pm:

    Bruce Rauner lies awake at night wondering how poor Ken Dunkin will ever make ends meet with a lousy $1.2 million…

    – MrJM


  28. - cdog - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:09 pm:

    “We were able to get one Democrat off of the override, so my veto stood,” Rauner said.

    Do tell, Mr. Rauner. How did that story go again?

    Rauner’s filters, the ones that he uses before he inserts his foot/leg/lower torso in his mouth, are really special.

    “I saw him (Dunkin) in South Beach Sunday afternoon.” Doing research for his next political career move, I am sure. /s

    (I hope Dunkin sends a thank you letter to the Illinois Project for Opportunity, or was that the Illinois Growth Project Opportunity, or was that Grow Illinois …. /s…. more word salad …./s)

    (Also, I appreciate, and am always a student of, Wordslinger’s logic and argumentation. :)


  29. - LizPhairTax - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:10 pm:

    How much of it has Tony Peraicia convinced Joesph Baar Topinka he’s entitled to?


  30. - SoILiberty - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:14 pm:

    Century Club wins (3 of them)

    Who has won the most? How far back does the ‘award’ go?


  31. - Signal and Noise - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:19 pm:

    I don’t buy it. He spent a bunch of street cash, sent mailers, did tv ads but none of that is reported. Something is fishy.


  32. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:27 pm:

    Someone riddle me this…

    Rauner holds $20 million, won’t give either GOP GA caucuses autonomy to be the lead of monies in a seven-figure nature… so far.

    Dunkin, who is a Democrat used to thwart overrides for Rauner is so… trusted… Dunkin still has $1.2 million parked… and Rauner is “fine” with that money still there?

    Rauner trusts Dunkin with $1.2 million, but can’t trust Radogno or Durkin with seven-figures sitting in their two accounts?

    That make sense?

    That wash?

    That seem logical?


  33. - Arthur Andersen - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:41 pm:

    OW, was the use of the term “wash” intentional?

    PS: Word, may need to break out the decoder rings; someone may have a doppelgänger or fanboy..


  34. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:42 pm:

    - AA -,

    Some things I just can’t slip by, can I?

    Easter Eggs…


  35. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 5:49 pm:

    Couldn’t we clear up all of these allegations pretty quickly if Dunkin announced he was donating the $1.2 million to Chicago State University?


  36. - Anon - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 6:03 pm:

    How about slated candidates who are unopposed, but hold mega-fundraising events.


  37. - Casual observer - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 6:18 pm:

    Is this Rauner’s way of telling house and senate Dems “there’s more where that came from”? Will anyone bite and vote against their caucus?


  38. - burbanite - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 6:34 pm:

    What I find telling is Rauner’s statement, “we were able to get one Democrat off of the override” Which seems to support that Dunkin was recruited not to show up for the vote.


  39. - James Knell - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 6:46 pm:

    Somebody has too much money and I’m not talking about Dunkin.


  40. - cdog - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 6:51 pm:

    Maybe it will start something among GOP.

    They should act like they are going to go against Rauner, then he will have to pony up to keep them in line.

    That’s kind of a fun story line, ya?


  41. - anon - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 7:06 pm:

    === Who has won the trophy the most? How far back does the ‘award’ go? ===

    Dunkin is the only multiple winner. I think he has actually won it at least four times. It was his responsibility to engrave the occasions on the trophy, however, so one got missed. It goes back to the 80s I think.


  42. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 7:12 pm:

    Why is it that McCann and Mautino are being I vestigated for campaign fund mileage $, and Dunkin has 1.2 million left over….and nobody says a word?


  43. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 7:15 pm:

    Dunkin won 3 times.


  44. - Whatever - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 7:48 pm:

    ==Dunkin is the only multiple winner. I think he has actually won it at least four times.==

    Meh, quantity rather than quality. The all-time loser was Blago’s gross receipts tax (SB1 in the 95th GA) which never made it to an actual vote, but the House voted 107 to zero with 7 excused/present on HR 402 to tell the Senate not to bother sending it to them. Never researched it, but I suspect it’s the only shutout ever.


  45. - Rhino Slider - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 8:22 pm:

    A million dollars is pretty cheap to break Madigan’s Super-majority.


  46. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 10:44 pm:

    –A million dollars is pretty cheap to break Madigan’s Super-majority.–

    Indeed.

    Dunkin’s expenditures, Proft’s contributions and their timing are outrageous — like federales look-see outrageous.

    Consider the runup to the March 15 primary, from the State Board of Elections:

    From Jan. 1 to March 31, 2016, Friends of Ken Dunkin spent $112,000.

    During that same time period, Proft’s Illinois Opportunity Project made three contributions to Friends of Ken Dunkin, totaling $1.3 million:

    Feb. 1 — $500,000
    March 4– $300,000
    March 14 — $500,000

    Take a good, hard look at those last two.

    Dunkin wasn’t spending any money. But a smart guy like Proft drops another $800K on him?

    Dunkin got creamed by Stratton, 68% to 32%. A smart guy like Proft doesn’t see that coming, days before the election?

    He drops another $300K on Dunkin on March 4, then another $500K on March 14 — the day before the election — when Dunkin hasn’t spent 25% of the first $500K?

    I guess Ken Dunkin is the only “vendor” Gov. Rauner is willing to pay for services already rendered.


  47. - MSIX - Tuesday, Apr 19, 16 @ 10:51 pm:

    =I guess Ken Dunkin is the only “vendor” Gov. Rauner is willing to pay for services already rendered.=

    This is what I’m sayin’. Stinks like Rahm’s fish.


  48. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Apr 20, 16 @ 8:26 am:

    Rauner misses the obvious point.

    Dunkin didn’t lose because of how he voted, or because he didn’t vote, or because he didn’t even show up.

    Dunkin lost because of his affiliation with Bruce Rauner.

    Sam McCann won because of his independence from Bruce Rauner.

    Lobbyists, local governments, labor leaders, and Republican legislators take note: Rauner’s plan - his hope - is to pick up legislative seats.

    Regardless of how realistic you might think that is (couldn’t pick up seats in a non-presidential year with the hapless Quinn atop the ticket, now you are defending Rauner and Trump in a state that is harshly Blue), what does it mean?

    1. Rauner plans to continue the budget stalemate beyond the 2016 elections.

    2. His plan hinges on passing a tax hike linked to rolling back Union benefits that only 16% of voters support.

    3. Should Repulicans pick up seats, that’ll be one more Republican and one fewer Democrat that will have to vote for the Rauner tax.


  49. - chi - Wednesday, Apr 20, 16 @ 8:32 am:

    If Dunkin decides to pay himself a salary as director of his campaign fund, the $1.2 million in principal would provide a salary of $75k/year for 30 years (actually 29.41 years) assuming a 5% yearly return.


  50. - Delimma - Wednesday, Apr 20, 16 @ 8:46 am:

    Last time I checked, no one can “make” a voter vote for or against someone. Yes, there are ads. Yes, there is a lot of money spent. But at the end of the day, the voters decide whether the representative (senator, candidate, president, whatever) represents them. If not, they don’t win.


  51. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 20, 16 @ 9:04 am:

    I understand the motivations of Dunkin’s secret admirers to use Proft’s Real Clean Laundry Service to bestow their lovely parting gifts on Ken for past considerations.

    But why did IllinoisGO have to involve the State Chamber for that near million-dollar TV spot?

    I know the chamber netted something like a whopping $15K for selling its name in support of one of its lowest-rated legislators.

    But why didn’t IllinoisGO just put its name on the spot? Its contributors aren’t secret (nice couple down in Houston). Why did they want the pass-through?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Question of the day
* Migrant shelter population down more than a third since end of January
* Tier 2 emails, calls inundating legislators
* Tax talk (Updated)
* That's some brilliant strategy you got there, Bubba
* Credit Unions: A Smart Financial Choice for Illinois Consumers
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and a campaign update
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller