Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » New legislation would require social media disclosure
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
New legislation would require social media disclosure

Monday, Oct 30, 2017

* The synopsis of SB2251, sponsored by Sens. Ira Silverstein and Andy Manar

Amends the Election Code. Provides that the disclosure requirements for political communications shall also apply to any political committee, organized under the Code, making a political communication utilizing any social media platform.

* Silverstein press release

Political ads on social media platforms would be regulated to disclose their sources and funders if a new measure sponsored by Senator Ira I. Silverstein (D-Chicago) becomes law.

Senate Bill 2251 was filed this week and would extend the same requirements for disclosure regarding print, TV and radio advertising to social media political ads.

“Social media is immediate and far-reaching,” Silverstein said. “Just because it is new media doesn’t mean it shouldn’t fall under the same requirements for existing media in terms of disclosing who funded, prepared and distributed the material. Voters deserve to know what organizations are behind all political ads.”

Attention to online political ads has grown in recent months after Facebook admitted that accounts connected to Russia purchased politically contentious ads ahead of the 2016 presidential election. An estimated $100,000 purchase targeted audiences in swing states with no disclosure about the sources of those ads.

“A recent Facebook ad falsely attacked an Illinois Senate colleague with no clear means of pursuing the source,” Silverstein said. “The laws must apply to online ads as they do everywhere else to keep our elections fair.”

Senate Bill 2251 awaits assignment to a Senate committee before moving to the full chamber for consideration.

* Bernie

A dispute that broke out on Facebook in recent weeks involving the Christian County GOP and state Sen. ANDY MANAR, D-Bunker Hill, has helped lead to some new proposed state legislation.

State Sen. IRA SILVERSTEIN, D-Chicago, said Senate Bill 2251, introduced last week with Manar as a co-sponsor, would require the same kind of disclosure for advertisements on social media sites as are now required for television, radio or newspaper ads if a political committee pays and names a candidate. […]

The proposed new state law would add “any social media platform” to categories such as pamphlets, radio, TV or print ads that require disclosure. That law already includes “Internet … communication,” but Silverstein and Manar want to make sure social media is covered.

“We always welcome any kind of clarification from the legislature,” said TOM NEWMAN, director of campaign disclosure at the State Board of Elections. “It might be covered under the existing statute, but if they want to make sure it’s covered, we’re all for that.”

* One issue I’ve been noticing online is that fundraising appeals aren’t including this state mandated language

10 ILCS 5/9-9) (from Ch. 46, par. 9-9)
Sec. 9-9. Any political committee shall include on all literature and advertisements soliciting funds the following notice:
“A copy of our report filed with the State Board of Elections is (or will be) available on the Board’s official website (insert the current website address) or for purchase from the State Board of Elections, Springfield, Illinois.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

12 Comments
  1. - Iggy - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 9:39 am:

    Typical from Thin skin Manar. He blocked me on twitter even though I have never tweeted at him or about him. But because I am a follower of the parody account “Randy Manar” I got the block. Maybe you should introduce a bill that bans elected officials from blocking their constituents, you know since we are basing legislation off of childish arguments.


  2. - We'll See - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 9:59 am:

    I, Rusty Shackleford, think this is a good idea.


  3. - Chicago Cynic - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:03 am:

    So we need to use 40 of our 140 characters for a disclosure statement? Wonder if Ira’s ever seen Twitter.


  4. - The Captain - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:10 am:

    Practically speaking how do you fit a disclosure into a 140 character limit?


  5. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:10 am:

    ===Practically speaking how do you fit a disclosure into a 140 character limit?===

    With an image.


  6. - Name Withheld - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:11 am:

    How does this stop online ads that are factually wrong? Does it require online ads to follow the same rules as ads on radio/TV/etc?


  7. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:11 am:

    For example: https://capitolfax.com/wp-content/ScreenShot20170928at12.17.31PM.jpg

    Plenty of room on that image for disclosure.


  8. - Not me - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:20 am:

    A good idea. Necessary.

    I assumed this was already the law. Fines should be assessed not only on any political committee who violates it but on the social media company. Newspapers vet ads for compliance. FaceCrook should do the same. Make them criminally liable then see how quickly they respond.


  9. - Truth Squad - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:23 am:

    When the ad is sponsored, Facebook and Twitter automatically say so. Like in Rich’s example.

    I have no problem with dropping a “Paid For by” on the bottom of an image ad or Google Display ad, but Andy is just being a baby.


  10. - Anonymous - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 10:39 am:

    Looks like the statute already applies to the Internet. What am I missing?


  11. - Mama - Monday, Oct 30, 17 @ 2:39 pm:

    This is a good idea. However, fundraising appeals should be included.


  12. - anon - Tuesday, Oct 31, 17 @ 7:40 am:

    ==One issue I’ve been noticing online is that fundraising appeals aren’t including this state mandated language…==

    Using Rich’s example of a Dan Biss Facebook ad…
    https://capitolfax.com/wp-content/ScreenShot20170928at12.17.31PM.jpg

    (A) Facebook doesn’t allow words in advert pictures… From experience, even pics of yard signs get rejected due to the words on the signs.

    (B) The state required text is incredibly long for a character- or word-limited ad. Perhaps the lege can consider shortening it or Facebook, etc. can create a line for a state-required hotlink going straight to the committee’s disclosures at elections.illinois.gov.

    Maybe turn the “Not affiliated with Facebook” into “Political Ad. Paid for by X. Click here for Campaign Report.”


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread and another LSSI reminder
* In defense of Mary Todd Lincoln on her 200th birthday
* Caption contest!
* Rauner says he'll file end of term report, clear clemency backlog
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker roundup
* Cook County Public Guardian sues DCFS: "Abject moral and human rights failure"
* Mendoza signature clearance rate is high during first round
* Your holiday season moment of Zen
* Pritzker criticized over lack of Active Transportation Alliance members on his transition committee
* Color me skeptical
* Pritzker heading to White House today
* Sen. Schimpf wants Satanic sculpture removed from rotunda as Rep. Bryant introduces condemnation resolution
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller