Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** Rauner’s “fair share” executive order struck down by St. Clair County judge
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** Rauner’s “fair share” executive order struck down by St. Clair County judge

Tuesday, Jan 2, 2018

* BND

A St. Clair County circuit judge’s ruling in a lawsuit could determine the financial health of Democratic-leaning labor unions that represent government workers.

Judge Chris Kolker issued the ruling Wednesday, vacating Gov. Bruce Rauner’s executive order to halt collection of union fees for nonunion members who work in state jobs but benefit from collective bargaining.

Kolker found that Rauner’s executive order violated state law, collective bargaining agreements and the Illinois Constitution. Kolker ruled that the governor was trying “to rewrite 26 collective bargaining agreements. This is expressly prohibited by state law.” […]

But the whole thing may be moot, pending a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in another case.

That second case involves Mark Janus, a state employee who says Illinois law violates his free speech rights by requiring him to pay fees subsidizing a union he doesn’t support, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. About half the states have similar laws covering so-called “fair share” fees that cover bargaining costs for nonmembers. […]

Patty Schuh, a Rauner spokeswoman, said the governor had issued the executive order in the St. Clair County case “to protect the First Amendment rights of government workers and initiated what became the Janus vs. AFSCME case. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Janus case because of the First Amendment rights at stake. We look forward to the Supreme Court’s decision.”

Schuh added, “The governor supports the freedom for all government workers to choose what political speech to support and whether or not to take money out of their paychecks to pay dues to a union.”

The ruling is here.

*** UPDATE *** AFSCME…

Public service workers know that Bruce Rauner is fiercely hostile to working people, wants to take away their freedom to join together in strong unions, and is determined to drive down their wages. That was the motivation for his illegal executive order and for the suit he initiated that’s now before the US Supreme Court.

Members of AFSCME and all public service unions are organizing to make sure their co-workers and their communities understand Rauner’s scheme to rig the system, silence working people and take more power and control for himself.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

44 Comments
  1. - Lt Guv - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 9:15 am:

    Thank you Chris.


  2. - Osborne Smith III - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 9:24 am:

    One more year of Bruce. We can do this.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 9:24 am:

    As 2018 begins, and the 2018 campaign season really begins, Rauner had four things he felt would be different in a second term, if Rauner wins;

    Janus, RTW zones, and destroying AF-Scammy.

    Rauner told this to the Chicago Tribune.

    Not better Higher Ed, not better infrastructure, not even lower taxes or better government… the goal(s) of a Rauner second term all revolve around hurting Labor, or hurting anyone else that might help others choose to hurt Labor, like social services.

    What an absolute waste of a gubernatorial term this Rauner first term was. A second term is geared toward hurting people, purposely, with no real vision for Illinois in the end.

    Don’t take my word for it. Rauner told us, so listen.


  4. - Raccoon Mario - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 9:38 am:

    I don’t agree with my taxes funding wars I don’t support, so I should get to opt out of paying taxes.


  5. - Domas - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 9:41 am:

    OW, what’s the fourth?


  6. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 9:45 am:

    Hurting as many non-Labor people, like social services, to force a choice to hurt Labor and not “them”, like social services.

    The three… Janus, RTW Zones, AF-Scammy… and the fourth, hurting others to keep hurting Labor… that’s the blueprint and vision Rauner sees for a second term… as warped as that is.


  7. - Generic Drone - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 10:05 am:

    Just a temperary setback for Rauner who is determined to destroy labor.


  8. - Generic Drone - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 10:07 am:

    Reminds me of Star Trek. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. However, in Rauners view, the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.


  9. - A Jack - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 10:10 am:

    Governor,
    Please determine the amount of my taxes you wasted on frivolous lawsuits and send me a check for that amount.


  10. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 10:11 am:

    How many “working people” tropes can AFSCME squeeze in before their inevitable post-Janus merger with SEIU?


  11. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 10:16 am:

    “What an absolute waste of a gubernatorial term this Rauner first term was. A second term is geared toward hurting people, purposely, with no real vision for Illinois in the end.”

    Perfectly said.

    I saw California Gov. Jerry Brown on “60 Minutes.” What a difference a governor makes. Brown cut spending, raised taxes and has a strong economy and budget surplus. None of this red state anti-union stuff. Now recreational marijuana is being sold in Cali, which will help even more.

    Minnesota, Colorado, Massachusetts and California are following different paths to prosperity, and none of them have plutocratic union-busting or the wealthiest Americans like Rauner and his funders trying to extort people by telling them jobs won’t come unless labor rights are reduced.


  12. - Ste_with_a_ven - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 10:58 am:

    “None of this red state anti-union stuff.”
    You may want to check that. He is not exactly loved by unions.


  13. - California Guy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:00 am:

    @ Grandson of Man

    Hard to compare California to Illinois and say that the prescription for success in California can be replicated in Illinois. Californians are willing to pay relatively high taxes as a cost to access perfect weather, proximity to diverse geography, recreation, etc. Illinois is in a very different place. There’s actually talk in the California Senate now about LOWERING the income tax rate to maintain a stable tech industry here.

    Brown is more of a Clinton-type centrist. He vetoes practically any spending increase and blocks the legislature from expanding social programs because he knows that California has an extremely high reliance on high income earners paying income tax. If the economy sinks, the State gets hit really hard. Aside from Rauner’s attacks on unions, Brown’s policies really aren’t all that different.


  14. - Steve Polite - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:03 am:

    What if I don’t agree with the political actions and lobbying of my utility companies? Does that violate my free speech rights? Shouldn’t I be able to opt out of paying for their services also?


  15. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:07 am:

    ===He is not exactly loved by unions.===

    Rauner’s anti-labor thoughts make others on a spectrum seem palatable.

    (Tips cap to - GoM -)


  16. - AC - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:13 am:

    ==You may want to check that. He is not exactly loved by unions.==

    Unions are indeed angry with Brown over pension reform, but that’s a long way from the types of policies Rauner has advocated for unions. Unions in Illinois were unhappy with Democrats over pension reform, but they learned there are far worse things than disagreement over a single issue.


  17. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:29 am:

    ==I saw California Gov. Jerry Brown on “60 Minutes.” What a difference a governor makes. Brown cut spending, raised taxes and has a strong economy and budget surplus.==

    Don’t forget his recent actions on pension reform.


  18. - California Guy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:33 am:

    In terms of policy, Brown and Rauner aren’t all that different. Rauner is definately “anti-union” relative to Brown, but both have pushed similar agendas on tax, labor, and pension reform.

    California is hard to compare to Illinois and what works for California might not work for Illinois. Californians are willing to stomach higher taxes to receive the benefits of perfect weather, a good university system, diverse geography, etc, but there’s also a lot of pragmatic work being done here (mainly by Brown) that wouldn’t even be considered in hyper-partisan Illinois. For example, the progressiveness of the income tax here has led to a high reliance on high income earners - many of which draw income from market returns. Brown has advocated for less of a reliance on that because it’s made the State budget unstable. Recessions happen and California is uniquely exposed. Brown has also championed a middle-ground position on pension reform that would be view as “nuclear” in Illinois.

    Very different attitude than the “if you’re not with us, you’re against us” attitude that is Illinois politics.


  19. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:34 am:

    None of those states unions are as powerful as Illinois labor unions. What are the unions in Illinois unhappy with budget busting democrats about?

    Nothing they object to passes the General Assembly


  20. - Whatever - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:44 am:

    ==Rauner’s anti-labor thoughts make others on a spectrum seem palatable.==

    Absolutely. They’ve made a lot of people (including George Will) believe that Madigan has always been the unions’ best friend.


  21. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 12:29 pm:

    Madigan is the union’s best friend refusing to fix the pensions he admits are unsustainable by calling Senator Cullerton’s pension bill or fix anything that will promote growth in the private sector to pay for all the largesse he has promised his supporters


  22. - Crispycritter - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 12:37 pm:

    Don’t want to pay union dues, don’t take a union job. Same analogy to don’t like flying, don’t become a pilot if you don’t want to be required to fly.


  23. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 12:47 pm:

    Waiting for ck. to say this was a victory.


  24. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:12 pm:

    ==Don’t want to pay union dues, don’t take a union job.==

    Unless the union pays the employee, it is not a union job. That’s why AFSCME workers for the state are typically referred to as state employees, not union employees. Because, you know, taxes.

    Does the union vet the job candidates’s qualifications during the application process? Does the union certify the employee’s credentials to perform the job? Does the union provide continuing education for that employee to grow on the job? For most public service unions, the answer is no to all 3.

    Union membership is not a pre-requisite to perform a job. As long as a person is qualified, folks don’t care if they join the union or not.


  25. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:12 pm:

    === Aside from Rauner’s attacks on unions, Brown’s policies really aren’t all that different. ===

    LOLOL

    You already need a vacation.


  26. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:18 pm:

    ==Nothing they object to passes the General Assembly ==

    Lol. Tier II. Employees still owed back wages. Insufficient appropriations for Group Insurance.


  27. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:20 pm:

    City Zen:

    Don’t take a union covered job. That is the more appropriate description.

    While the Courts may disagree I still say that nobody is forced to join a union. You know up front if union membership is required. If you don’t like unions then don’t take that job.


  28. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:21 pm:

    ==refusing to fix the pensions==

    Tier II. Now Tier III. You’re problem is that you don’t like it they can’t do anything about Tier I.


  29. - Crispycritter - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:23 pm:

    City Zen, you totally miss the point, your logic makes no logical sense.


  30. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:33 pm:

    Demoralized: So if I have all the qualifications to perform a state job but don’t want to join the administrative layer between me and the job, I can’t take the state job? If I have a PhD in Mathematics, am certified to teach, and wish to teach math in Englewood at a fraction of what I could earn in the private sector, yet don’t want to join CTU, I can’t teach?

    Why would citizens care if qualified and willing people are union members or not if it has no bearing on performing the actual job?


  31. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:38 pm:

    Nobody said you can’t take the job, City Zen. Jobs have all kinds of requirements. Union membership is a requirement for most state jobs. If union membership so offends someone then they don’t have to take the job.

    Again, while the courts might disagree I don’t see how someone’s 1st Amendment rights are being violated when they aren’t being forced to do anything.


  32. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:39 pm:

    - City Zen -

    Collective bargaining is designed to get the best deal for a workforce. That’s what it’s designed to do, when management agrees and terms are then put to paper.

    Your “concern” for that teacher, if it’s you or not, seems to waver between unions themselves are bad, and they stifle jobs.

    Are you saying the teacher shortage in CPS is due to CTU?


  33. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 1:53 pm:

    When the Governor issued his Executive Order more people went from Fair Share to full union members. Even if Janus is successful I’m not sure he’s going to get the result in the state workforce that he thinks he’s going to get. It will be interesting if any significant amount of people leave the union. I’m betting they won’t.


  34. - California Guy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 3:07 pm:

    @ Rich Miller

    “LOLOL

    You already need a vacation.”

    Happy to hear how you think reforming pensions, flattening the State tax code, resisting single-payer health care, expanding the use of toll roads, opposing large minimum wage increases, and criminal justice reform are significantly different between Rauner and Brown. Both share those positions - it sounds like you are unaware of Brown’s legislative history here in California.

    Even on minimum wage, Brown signed the minimum wage bill under veto override threat to avoid having the unions take it to public referendum. He signed it while literally saying: “Economically, the minimum wage may not make sense.”


  35. - RNUG - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 3:10 pm:

    Technically, union membership is NOT required for any State job.

    If you take a job covered by a union contract, you don’t have to become a union member. But you DO have to pay the “fair share” fee.

    As far as I am concerned, this case is not about 1st Amendment rights per se. The actual lobbying that Janus is objecting to is done by the PAC, not the union. In theory, no “fair share” fees are used for lobbying. The only legal question I see is if there is enough separation (Chinese Wall) between the PAC activities and the union activities.

    Be interesting to see how strictly SCOTUS defines / rules on this case.


  36. - Hottot - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 3:12 pm:

    ===Madigan is the union’s best friend refusing to fix the pensions he admits are unsustainable by calling Senator Cullerton’s pension bill or fix anything that will promote growth in the private sector to pay for all the largesse he has promised his supporters===

    Lucky Pierre, you’re forgetting the Tier 2 pension benefit that greatly reduces the pension benefit, and requires employees to work longer. You’re also forgetting SB 1 that slashed pension benefits for current employees and retirees. Madigan wanted that bill passed, then the SCOIL threw it out unanimously.


  37. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 3:20 pm:

    Jerry Brown solves problems. He doesn’t just talk about it.


  38. - Morty - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 3:21 pm:

    Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 11:34 am:

    None of those states unions are as powerful as Illinois labor unions. What are the unions in Illinois unhappy with budget busting democrats about?

    Nothing they object to passes the General Assembly

    You must have missed the creation of Tier II and the 2014 attempt at pension reform that passed both chambers and was signed by Governor Quinn.

    You might have placed it in your Memory Hole but the rest of us haven‘t


  39. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 3:41 pm:

    OW - There’s a teacher shortage at CPS? Is this outside the typical SpEd and STEM “shortages” many districts deal with? According to NCES, Illinois still boasts a lower student/teacher ratio than they did 10 years ago. Please cite your sources.


  40. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 3:48 pm:

    - City Zen -

    http://bit.ly/2lJ93WV


  41. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 4:27 pm:

    ==The only legal question I see is if there is enough separation (Chinese Wall) between the PAC activities and the union activities.==

    Agreed. It’s sometimes difficult to discern what union activities are not political. When AFSCME contributes $12,000 of dues money to Citizens Action and reports it not as political activities but as a grant, as they did in 2016, then Citizens Action offers nothing but political opinions on Twitter, how is that not political speech?

    OW - Thanks.


  42. - Skeptic - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 8:09 pm:

    $12,000 of dues money or fair share money? If it’s the former then it’s a non-issue. If it’s the latter you need to back up your claim.


  43. - City Zen - Tuesday, Jan 2, 18 @ 8:46 pm:

    Skeptic - A union’s LM-2 report isn’t a cash-flow statement. All I can tell you is what the report says. There are separate categories for expenses. The payment to Citizens Action is under “contributions, gifts, and grants”, not “political activities and lobbying”. Under “contributions, gifts, and grants” on that same report are $5,000 payments to both Sargent Shriver Center on Poverty Law and Faith Coalition for the Common Good.

    So the question is where does the money come from for Shriver and Faith, because it comes from the same “pot” as Citizens Action. If it’s from dues, AFSCME will need to back up their claim…to the Supreme Court.


  44. - Rabid - Wednesday, Jan 3, 18 @ 5:20 am:

    Anyone who hates their coworkers for certifying a union, needs to get along or get along


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* State Journal-Register endorses Rauner "with reservations"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Pritzker campaign lawyer hints at defamation suit, claims campaign was never served
* Rauner says he's "trying to eradicate" the Madigan machine "cancer," but the "treatments are tough"
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Speaker Ryan to campaign for Davis *** Trump likely coming to Illinois to boost Bost
* Musical Interlude: Try (just a little bit harder)
* Tell me another fairytale, Grandpa
* Rauner again denies any delays at Quincy veterans' home
* "Speed dating" candidates
* Lawyer won't answer simple questions as some anonymous former Pritzker staffers speak out
* AFL-CIO launches "massive" digital ad buy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller