Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rauner administration looking at Medicaid work requirements
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rauner administration looking at Medicaid work requirements

Friday, Jan 12, 2018

* Tribune

Illinois is reviewing new guidance from the Trump administration that opens the door for states to impose work requirements on Medicaid recipients, but there is no indication yet that it will follow the lead of neighboring states that are pursuing plans to tighten their rules.

Gov. Bruce Rauner’s office and the state’s Department of Healthcare and Family Services said the new policy and its implications are “under review,” but the Republican administration has not signaled whether it supports Medicaid work requirements. Local patient advocates said they hope Illinois does not join the 10 states that already have submitted proposals to make having a job a condition of Medicaid eligibility, for fear it would leave tens of thousands of people without health insurance. […]

More than 1.2 million non-disabled working-age adults receive Medicaid in Illinois, and most do work. Two-thirds of Illinois’ non-disabled and non-elderly Medicaid recipients hold a full-time or part-time job, and more than 80 percent are part of working families, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s analysis of 2016 Census data. Many others are caregivers or go to school. […]

Work requirements also are opposed by the Illinois Health and Hospital Association, which advocates for more than 200 hospitals and nearly 50 health systems in the state. The group believes work requirements would limit access to care and leave hospitals picking up the tab for uninsured patients.

Thoughts on this?

* Related…

* Another Illinois Medicaid shake-up threatens hospitals: For years, nearly every Illinois hospital has paid into a pot of money that helps the state bring in more federal dollars. But the program, effectively a tax on hospitals, is dated and doesn’t reflect how much the health care industry has changed… The reality is that a lot has changed. Low-income Chicago neighborhoods that surround safety-net hospitals have emptied out, dwindling their patient base. The push toward outpatient care means fewer people need to be hospitalized. At the same time, the state expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, leading to crops of new patients who sought care elsewhere. The bottom line: The current assessment program doesn’t reflect where Medicaid patients seek treatment. “It’s a tough process to renegotiate,” said Rep. Greg Harris, a Chicago Democrat who is among the state lawmakers working to redesign the program. “Every hospital in the state is affected. There will be winners and there will be losers.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

19 Comments
  1. - Montrose - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 12:27 pm:

    I don’t believe in work requirements as part of accessing public benefits. I believe in providing real, substantive supports to folks that can use them to stabilize their lives and put them on the path to living wage work.

    Aside from that, Medicaid is much worse candidate for requirements than TANF or SNAP.

    - We are talking about public health issues and ultimately saving the state and the healthcare system money because people have access to regular care and preventive medicine.
    - We are also talking about a support that can’t be transferred to others - legally or illegally.
    - You know what makes it hard to get a job? Chronic health issues. It very literally about making sure people don’t die.
    - If you want people to take advantage of opportunity and be able to contribute to society, do not create a situation where they will be saddled with medical debt.

    Creating a work requirement just creates costly bureaucracy and undermines our collective public health needs. I hope common sense prevails.


  2. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 12:32 pm:

    To appease that Trump base and get support from “Trump conservatives”, Rauner should come out in favor of this…

    … in a blue state Clinton won by 17 points, and he (Rauner) is sitting 25 points under water.

    Yep.

    Rauner should look at this.


  3. - Andrea Durbin - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:01 pm:

    There is no evidence that imposing Medicaid work requirements achieves the policy outcomes. It would increase administrative expenses dramatically, as we would have to monitor the employment status of all adults on Medicaid. It would cause people to lose health insurance, which actually hurts their ability to work.


  4. - 47th Ward - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:01 pm:

    Most Medicaid recipients in Illinois are children. It’s about time those deadbeats got off their behinds and found a job. Put down the X-Box and pick up a shovel, I say, or no health care for you.

    Also, drug test. Test them all for drugs, especially the children.


  5. - Sir Reel - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:03 pm:

    How about requiring work requirements on Governors who claim they’re not in charge?


  6. - NeverPoliticallyCorrect - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:05 pm:

    The is nothing inherently wrong with requiring someone who receives any unearned public entitlement to perform some type of public service or work. It is in he implementation where the trouble begins. Can they adequately and accurately determine who is capable of work, how do you verify that they have engaged in an active job search, have they been offered a job, how long do they need to keep a job to maintain eligibility? these and more details must be answered but who will do this? State government? Doubtful, they can barely keep the ship afloat now in Springfield without adding another layer of employees. And what will the oversight cost to Medicaid be in verifying work activities? Rauner won’t know how to do this and the Dems won’t want to add this level of accountability. Outcome in Illinois, it’s DOA.


  7. - illinifan - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:10 pm:

    The amount of man hours needed to track this activity would be cost prohibitive and the benefit questionable. Many persons on Medicaid already work (I have seen numbers ranging from 60-80% based on the population) and of those that don’t work often have disabilities that prevent employment. KFF reports that about 10% of Medicaid recipients fall into the able bodied group. Don’t think the policy would be of any major benefit.


  8. - Anon221 - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:13 pm:

    No surprise here… Kentucky just got approved-

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/01/12/577659054/kentucky-gets-ok-to-require-work-from-medicare-recipients


  9. - Pelonski - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:35 pm:

    Some of the people who need Medicaid have very limited skills and education and find it difficult to get hired. Unless we are willing to guarantee that jobs are available to them, adding a work requirement should be a non-starter.


  10. - Not-so-lucky Pete - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:36 pm:

    2/3 of Medicaid benefits in Illinois go to senior citizens and people with disabilities.


  11. - yinn - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 1:42 pm:

    ==KFF reports that about 10% of Medicaid recipients fall into the able bodied group.==

    Yes, and many of the so-called able-bodied are actually disabled, but unable to qualify for benefits (or are caught somewhere within an often years-long process). Then there are able-bodied who are unpaid though full time caregivers to family members.

    What a potentially ugly development.


  12. - walker - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 2:07 pm:

    “”2/3 of Medicaid benefits in Illinois go to senior citizens and people with disabilities.”"

    Add in the children covered by Medicaid and the total number is around 85%.

    Doesn’t anyone who proposes such an idea bother to do any research?

    More an ideological stance than a practical one.


  13. - kimocat - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 2:33 pm:

    “Doesn’t anyone who proposes such as idea bother to do any research?” No, they don’t. Because it is not about what works, it is about what about appealing to the folks who think all poor people are lazy takers who deserve more grief in their lives.


  14. - Anonymous - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 2:49 pm:

    The general commentary here is right on the money. It’s a costly, impractical, and unworkable. And stupid.


  15. - wordslinger - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 3:09 pm:

    –“”2/3 of Medicaid benefits in Illinois go to senior citizens and people with disabilities.””

    Add in the children covered by Medicaid and the total number is around 85%.

    Doesn’t anyone who proposes such an idea bother to do any research?–

    Yes. Research shows it’s mighty fine red meat for the full-mooners.


  16. - Truthteller - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 3:39 pm:

    How about all the employers, like McDonalds and Wal-Mart, who don’t provide health insurance to their employees? The state would save a lot more money if it required these employers to pay Medicaid for their employees insurance then if it tries to impose a work requirement on the few people who might be able to work


  17. - Honeybear - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 3:47 pm:

    Just a technical question.
    How are you going to do this with the smallest amount of HSC’s, Human Services Caseworkers the state has ever had to perform the titanic task of administering this?

    Oh, oh that’s right
    Privatization

    We all know how much that has cost us
    And how well it worked.

    That’s the play afoot


  18. - Anon221 - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 3:55 pm:

    People who construct these policies like Seema Verma are hoping the policies will eventually make those people who, in their considered opinions, are a drain on society, just go away- one way or another. The patient dumping in Baltimore this week illustrates in heartbreaking detail how some people decide others should be treated.


  19. - RNUG - Friday, Jan 12, 18 @ 4:30 pm:

    == How about all the employers, like McDonalds and Wal-Mart, who don’t provide health insurance to their employees? The state would save a lot more money if it required these employers to pay Medicaid for their employees insurance then if it tries to impose a work requirement on the few people who might be able to work ==

    This … all day long. But it will not happen because we are addicted to cheap stuff …


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* State Journal-Register endorses Rauner "with reservations"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Pritzker campaign lawyer hints at defamation suit, claims campaign was never served
* Rauner says he's "trying to eradicate" the Madigan machine "cancer," but the "treatments are tough"
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Speaker Ryan to campaign for Davis *** Trump likely coming to Illinois to boost Bost
* Musical Interlude: Try (just a little bit harder)
* Tell me another fairytale, Grandpa
* Rauner again denies any delays at Quincy veterans' home
* "Speed dating" candidates
* Lawyer won't answer simple questions as some anonymous former Pritzker staffers speak out
* AFL-CIO launches "massive" digital ad buy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller