Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rauner continues editorial board meetings
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rauner continues editorial board meetings

Friday, Sep 28, 2018

* Gov. Bruce Rauner’s campaign reset speech was ready-made for editorial board meetings. Here he is with the Pantagraph

He admitted, however, he might have pursued “smaller wins” rather than push so hard that the state went more than two years without a budget — and said he’s now better equipped to handle Madigan, a Chicago Democrat.

“What’s different is two things. One, I’ve learned to work with him and also around him. That’s how we got a lot of things done in the last year, 18 months,” said Rauner. “Two, he’s weaker in his strength in the General Assembly than at any time I’m aware of. … There are now so many more legislators who will stand up and say, ‘I’m doing this because it’s right.’”

Rauner said that approach will help grow businesses and address the state’s budget problems. He said that’s a better approach than a graduated income tax, which makes the wealthy pay more — a proposal Pritzker has made central to his campaign but Rauner opposes.

“We can all have our dreams, but we’ve got to deal with reality,” said Rauner. “More taxes are not going to give us a better future.”​

As we clearly saw during the impasse, less taxes won’t balance the budget.

Also, what did he get done in the past 18 months by going around Madigan? I can’t think of anything offhand. Just the other way around, in fact. Also, those Democratic legislators who are standing up to say they’re doing something “because it’s right” are mainly liberals who have few policy agreements with the governor.

He also talked extensively about “right to work” and even claimed that the Toyota plant we lost to Mississippi will be staffed by union workers. I seriously doubt that. He claimed, as well, that factory workers in Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin make more than factory workers in Illinois. Not true.

* Anyway, speaking of editorial boards and Madigan, the Kankakee Daily Journal’s editorial board pressed former Rep. Lisa Dugan (D-Bradley) about whether she’d be voting for Madigan for House Speaker. Dugan is trying to regain her former seat after her 2013 retirement. She’s running against freshman Rep. Lindsay Parkhurst (R-Kankakee)..

Asked whether she would vote for Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, to remain as speaker, Dugan made no commitment. She noted that much of the GOP’s advertising ties her to Madigan. And she acknowledged she voted for Madigan four times during her nearly decade as a lawmaker.

“I worked with Michael Madigan for nine-and-a-half years and fought with him for nine-and-a-half years,” Dugan said.

As an example, she said she worked against Madigan’s transit bill because it took money away from the local transit district.

“What you have to do in Springfield is work with 117 other legislators and one of them is Michael Madigan. You have to work with leadership on the Democratic and Republican sides,” Dugan said.

Parkhurst, however, said her first vote in Springfield was against Madigan. She said Dugan voted for Madigan’s proposed tax increase and pension holidays, meaning the state delayed payments into the pension systems.

“(Dugan) will vote for Mike Madigan. Don’t let her fool you,” Parkhurst said.

Dugan was no shrinking violet when she was in the House. But she was also very popular with her colleagues on both sides of the aisle. The Republicans claim the Madigan stuff is damaging this year, though. We’ll see.

Also, the process is the two caucuses privately choose their candidates for House Speaker and then there’s a formal public election between a Democrat and a Republican. I’m not sure the Daily Journal gets that.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

13 Comments
  1. - Demoralized - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 12:39 pm:

    ==There are now so many more legislators who will stand up and say, ‘I’m doing this because it’s right.==

    Like the ones who stood up to you on the tax increase and budget? Those legislators?

    Rauner seems to be under the impression that Democratic legislators are going to stand up against Madigan and pass his agenda. He seems to live in this fantasy that the only reason he can’t get what he wants is because of Madigan. When it comes to many of his “turnaround agenda” items, even if Madigan were gone they wouldn’t pass. Right to work? Not happening, Madigan or not.

    Contrary to the Governor’s proclamations he hasn’t learned anything.


  2. - The Dude Abides - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 12:43 pm:

    The only reason anything got done this year is because it is an election year and Rauner wouldn’t dare create another crisis this year because of that.
    If he is reelected, based on Rauner’s recent comments at his reset speech, I expect him to revert to who he was during his first 3 years. He will create more crisis, continue to run up more debt and thwart any effort to rejuvenate our economy unless his laundry list of non budget items are met.


  3. - Demoralized - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 12:44 pm:

    ==That’s how we got a lot of things done in the last year, 18 months,==

    And, I would argue the way things have gotten done was by working around the Governor, not the other way around.


  4. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 12:45 pm:

    If the overall case is…

    “I’m not in charge, but I’m trying to get to be in charge… Madigan is still powerful, but weaker… “

    Who would give that governor another term?

    It’s the jibberish that Diana Rauner then complains that the messaging isn’t resonating.

    No one likes Bruce.

    Bruce speaks jibberish.

    Yikes, this is awful to think an incumbent governor is going out of their way to sell themselves like this for a second term.


  5. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 12:46 pm:

    Also… it’s been said… I’ve said it too… it’s also true…

    Things got done “in spite of” Rauner, not “because of” Rauner.


  6. - A Jack - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 1:08 pm:

    So Rauner is back with his tired turn around agenda except possibly in moderation. Didn’t Rauner get the nickname of 1.4% because that was the expected growth rate of his turn around agenda? Although he really hasn’t even substantiated that growth rate.

    Rauner does not know how to grow Illinois’ economy. Four years of Rauner have proven that.


  7. - Rich Miller - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 1:10 pm:

    ===the expected growth rate===

    It was the expected state budget growth.


  8. - Steve - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 1:33 pm:

    Shows what a pathetic campaign Rauner is running. Voters aren’t swayed by editorials in many elections at the Governor level or the Presidential level. Trump got next to zero editorial endorsements : it doesn’t really matter. Even if Rauner got every major newspaper endorsement in Illinos, he still wouldn’t win.


  9. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 1:43 pm:

    ==I’m not sure the Daily Journal gets that.==

    I don’t think anyone in Illinois gets that. They all seem to be under the impression that the first vote taken when session begins is a motion to determine whether or not Madigan is a good dude.

    Also, anyone have any idea why these dems can’t bring themselves to answer “no” when asked this question? What do they care if Madigan is Speaker and not some other dem? All are trying to get elected, if voting against Madigan is what’s need to do that, then do it. Get there, then worry about where re-elect funds are going to come from.


  10. - Rich Miller - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 1:57 pm:

    ===Get there, then worry about where re-elect funds===

    Usually costs more to get there than to be reelected. So, if they say no to MJM, they won’t raise much $


  11. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 3:30 pm:

    ==Usually costs more to get there than to be reelected. So, if they say no to MJM, they won’t raise much $==

    Maybe, but perhaps they can go to Pritzker instead for funds? Besides, you’d think Madigan would rather have a dem who votes absent when the speaker vote comes up than a republican. Is the guys ego just that darned big, he’d rather have Breen in the seat instead of a dem who doesn’t vote fo him as speaker?


  12. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 3:38 pm:

    Sorry, meant Parkhurst - not Breen.


  13. - Pundent - Friday, Sep 28, 18 @ 3:44 pm:

    This is the consequence of running the constant “Madigan” message and claiming not to be in charge. It doesn’t create a compelling reason to vote for Rauner so he now has to create an alternate universe to convince us that things would be different going forward.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Springfield: Restricting PBM Tools Will Raise Costs for Consumers, Employers + the State
* Three Months To Make History: Time Is Running Out To Pass The Path To 100 Act
* Credit Unions: The People Helping People Philosophy
* A Fair Map Prioritizes Voting Rights And Public Input
* Illinois Small Businesses Support - And Need - The Clean Energy Jobs Act
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Reader comments closed for spring break
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller