Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Republicans object to ethics commission
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Republicans object to ethics commission

Friday, Nov 15, 2019

* We talked a bit yesterday about the legislative ethics bill, but not much about the new ethics commission. Jerry Nowicki at Capitol News Illinois

House Republican Leader Jim Durkin, of Western Springs, questioned why language adding requirements to lawmakers’ statements of economic interest was removed from the lobbyist disclosure bill, Senate Bill 1639, by a late amendment Thursday.

Rep. Greg Harris, D-Chicago, who carried the bill in the House, said economic interest disclosures would be discussed by the commission created in House Joint Resolution 93.

“Do we really need a commission to be able to come up with a solution that is, I would say, practical but also the right thing to do?” Durkin asked. “I’ve seen commissions come and go over the years. Many of us look at those commissions with jaundiced eyes because generally they don’t produce the positive results that we think are important.”

The commission’s role would be to study ethics reforms and report its recommendations on specific pieces of legislation to lawmakers, who would have the ultimate authority to enact the measures.

* Finke

Legislators also created an ethics commission that will develop more comprehensive ethics reforms that lawmakers can take up during the spring session. Gov. J.B. Pritzker will appoint some members as will the four legislative leaders, Secretary of State Jesse White and Attorney General Kwame Raoul. […]

While the ethics bill itself did pass with wide, bipartisan majorities in both the House and Senate, the resolution creating the ethics commission did not. All of the Senate Republicans voted against the measure, saying the makeup of the commission is too heavily weighted in favor of Democrats.

“We need to do something, but we need to do something that is balanced,” said Senate Republican Leader Bill Brady of Bloomington. “Corruption and ethics aren’t partisan. This is an unbalanced, partisan commission, though.”

Republicans objected to White and Raoul, both Democrats, having appointees to the commission. However, Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, said the secretary of state and attorney general’s offices play a role in ethics and ethics enforcement and both offices should be represented on the commission.

* Dan Petrella and Jamie Munks at the Tribune

In response to those criticisms, the final measure requires Raoul and White to name the inspectors general from their offices as one of their two appointments. Pritzker, who gets four appointments to the commission, could name up to four Republicans but only two Democrats.

That wasn’t enough to appease Senate Republicans, none of whom voted in favor of the measure creating the commission.

Republican leader Bill Brady of Bloomington said it would create an “unbalanced, partisan commission.”

“That’s what the people will see, and that will disgust them,” Brady said.

I dunno, maybe run better statewide candidates?

* Meanwhile

Rep. Tim Butler asked rhetorically, “We’re allowing someone who is a lobbyist in the state of Illinois to appoint a co-chair?” Cullerton is a registered lobbyist with the City of Chicago (he has not logged any lobbying activity since 2016). “There needs to be more balance. I will vote for this because this is a step forward, but hopefully we can address some of those situations,” Butler said.

Cullerton spokesman John Patterson said the city has a much broader definition of lobbyist and that Cullerton is registered out of an abundance of caution “given the legal work he does as a lawyer in Chicago.”

“Obviously he will not appoint a lobbyist to the commission,” Patterson said.

…Adding… Another view…


Kyle lobbies for the social workers.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

21 Comments
  1. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 9:50 am:

    === I dunno, maybe run better statewide candidates?===

    Without “googling”, who were the SoS, Treasurer, and Comptroller Raunerite candidates in 2018?

    Exactly.


  2. - Not a Superstar - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 9:55 am:

    I object that there are no appointees by the Leader of the Eastern Bloc.


  3. - NotRich - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 9:55 am:

    “Obviously he will not appoint a lobbyist to the commission” Of course not, why put someone on the commission that will deal with regulating lobbyists. Absurd that we should get input from an industry that will be 50% of the commission’s work.. 177 hypocrites on the 3rd floor, and many on the 2nd floor..


  4. - Tim - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 9:59 am:

    Even though they got elected I am not sure why anyone would assume the Democrats in the statewide offices are good candidates themselves. Just saying…….


  5. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:01 am:

    Not Rich, the law specifically prohibits state-registered lobbyists from serving on the commission.


  6. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:04 am:

    - Tim -

    They were good enough to win, lol


  7. - lake county democrat - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:12 am:

    How about we just dust-off the blue-ribbon Quinn commission’s recommendations? Or ask the guv and legislative leaders which parts that weren’t implemented they object to and why.


  8. - Froganon - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:17 am:

    We are a superminority in both houses and hold no statewide offices and demand a majority on the ethics commission. The logic/consequences train derailed…again.


  9. - Chicagonk - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:22 am:

    @lake county - That would be too easy. Honestly Illinois would need a commission to study legislative commissions.


  10. - Rabid - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:30 am:

    Elections have consequences , don’t blame democrats, thank govenor junk


  11. - Rich Miller - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:32 am:

    ===dust-off the blue-ribbon Quinn commission’s recommendations===

    That commission was somewhat odd. Illinois had just impeached and removed its governor and only a fraction of the report dealt with the executive branch.


  12. - City Zen - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:33 am:

    ==why put someone on the commission that will deal with regulating lobbyists==

    Even Vegas hires ex-cheats to spot the cheaters.


  13. - SSL - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:35 am:

    The whole thing is a waste of time. The power brokers need money to keep the game alive. They’ll ensure there are enough ways to keep the game going. And it would be the same if Republicans held all the cards. It’s the Illinois way.


  14. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:40 am:

    Dear Mr. Butler,

    Even Mr. Wehrli, the looney tweets notwithstanding, voted for the ethics bill.

    Raunerism got you to 44, closer to 40 than 50 for cripes sake.

    You want balance.

    Win elections.


  15. - Bertrum Cates - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:46 am:

    = dust-off the blue-ribbon Quinn commission’s recommendations =

    Sheila?


  16. - Ron Burgundy - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 10:53 am:

    Now that the GOP has laid down their marker in terms of proposals, they should cooperate with the process and support what they can support. If they think the process drags on or produces only show legislation that doesn’t sufficiently cover legislators as well as lobbyists they can make their case to the voters. That along with the fact that the current targets are Democratic should make for a pretty good case. Until they screw it up.


  17. - Obamas Puppy - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 11:02 am:

    Lobbyist ethics reform -aka- the guilty get off and the innocent get punished.


  18. - R A T - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 11:04 am:

    I am confused about the part regarding statements of economic interest. Isn’t this something State employees have to do? IF so, then two things:
    1) legislators work for the state
    2) anything that is ethically required of those lesser than you, must be applied to you. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander applies to all businesses (including gov’t)


  19. - JS Mill - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 11:19 am:

    Durkin isn’t wrong about commissions, they are pretty much a dog and pony show.

    =Republican leader Bill Brady of Bloomington said it would create an “unbalanced, partisan commission.”=

    I was impressed by Brady’s statement with regard to Cullerton, sounding statesman like. That was a first.

    Then this today. He still does not have a fundamental understanding of how government works, particularly with regard to elections and consequences.


  20. - The Dude Abides - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 2:25 pm:

    Durkin & Brady allowed an outsider with a lot of money to come in and basically buy the Illinois GOP. I would argue that was unethical. The outsider, Rauner, lead them down the path to where they are now, a super minority.


  21. - walker - Friday, Nov 15, 19 @ 2:26 pm:

    RAT: Legislators already fill out statements of economic interest, as many others do. This bill proposed expanding and improving them.


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Three prison guards indicted on charges related to inmate death
* Doherty out at City Club, may have been conduit for 100 ComEd jobs
* Roundup and open thread
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller