Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x7 *** US Attorney, FBI and IRS to hold news conference to announce “an indictment in a public corruption investigation”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x7 *** US Attorney, FBI and IRS to hold news conference to announce “an indictment in a public corruption investigation”

Wednesday, Mar 2, 2022 - Posted by Rich Miller

…Adding… Click here for a live video feed of today’s press conference.

* Comments will be turned on at the time of the announcement to prevent any wild speculation…

U.S. Attorney’s Office to Hold News Conference Today at 4:30 p.m.

Officials from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, FBI, and IRS Criminal Investigation Division will hold a news conference today at 4:30 p.m. to announce an indictment in a public corruption investigation.

The news conference will be held at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, 9th-floor Press Room, Dirksen Federal Building, 219 S. Dearborn St., Chicago IL 60604.

Media credentials and masks will be required to enter the building and access the news conference.

WHO: John R. Lausch, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois
Emmerson Buie, Jr., Special Agent-in-Charge of the FBI Chicago Field Office
Justin Campbell, Special Agent-in-Charge of the IRS-CI Chicago Field Office

WHAT: The officials will announce an indictment in a public corruption investigation.

WHERE: U.S. Attorney’s Office, 9th-floor Press Room, Dirksen Federal Building, 219 S. Dearborn St., Chicago IL 60604
Media credentials and masks will be required to enter the building and access the news conference.

WHEN: Wednesday, March 2, 2022, 4:30 p.m.
Press Room opens at 3:45 p.m.

*** UPDATE 1 *** This rumor has been hot as heck all week. Tribune

Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, for decades the most powerful politician in the state, was indicted Wednesday on federal racketeering charges alleging an array of bribery schemes aimed at using the power of his office for personal gain, sources told the Tribune.

The indictment was returned by a federal grand jury after a more than two-year investigation, sources said.

…Adding… The Sun-Times and ABC 7’s I-Team are also reporting this.

*** UPDATE 2 *** Some early react before the actual indictment is made public…



*** UPDATE 3 *** More Tribune

The indictment was returned by a federal grand jury after a more than two-year investigation, according to federal prosecutors. Among the alleged schemes outlined in the indictment was a plan by utility giant Commonwealth Edison to pay thousands of dollars to lobbyists favored by Madigan in order to win his influence over legislation the company wanted passed in Springfield.

The indictment also accused Madigan of illegally soliciting business for his private property tax law firm during discussions to turn a state-owned parcel of land in Chinatown into a commercial development.

Though the land deal never was consummated, it’s been a source of continued interest for federal investigators, who in 2020 subpoenaed Madigan’s office for records and communications he’d had with key players.

*** UPDATE 4 *** Uh-oh…


*** UPDATE 5 *** Let’s go back up to the top of the indictment…


*** UPDATE 6 *** Ouch…


*** UPDATE 7 *** Press release…

A federal grand jury in Chicago today indicted former Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives MICHAEL J. MADIGAN on racketeering and bribery charges for allegedly using his official position to corruptly solicit and receive personal financial rewards for himself and his associates.

The 22-count indictment accuses Madigan of leading for nearly a decade a criminal enterprise whose purpose was to enhance Madigan’s political power and financial well-being while also generating income for his political allies and associates. The charges allege that Madigan, who served as Speaker and occupied a number of other roles, including Representative of Illinois’s 22nd District, Committeeman for Chicago’s 13th Ward, Chairman of both the Illinois Democratic Party and the 13th Ward Democratic Organization, and partner at the Chicago law firm of Madigan & Getzendanner, used these positions to further the goals of the criminal enterprise. The indictment alleges that Madigan directed the activities of his close friend – co-defendant MICHAEL F. MCCLAIN – and that McClain carried out illegal activities at Madigan’s behest. Madigan and McClain allegedly caused various businesses, including the utility company Commonwealth Edison, to make monetary payments to Madigan’s associates as a reward for their loyalty to Madigan, at times in return for performing little or no legitimate work for the businesses.

Madigan, McClain, and other members of the enterprise allegedly unlawfully solicited benefits from businesses and other private parties. The indictment accuses Madigan of engaging in multiple schemes to reap the benefits of private legal work unlawfully steered to his law firm, including legal work from those with business before the State of Illinois and City of Chicago.

Madigan, 79, of Chicago, is charged with racketeering conspiracy and individual counts of using interstate facilities in aid of bribery, wire fraud, and attempted extortion. McClain, 74, of Quincy, Ill., is charged with racketeering conspiracy and individual counts of using interstate facilities in aid of bribery and wire fraud.

Arraignments in U.S. District Court in Chicago have not yet been scheduled.

The indictment was announced by John R. Lausch, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; Emmerson Buie, Jr., Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Office of the FBI; and Justin Campbell, Special Agent-in-Charge of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division in Chicago. The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Amarjeet S. Bhachu, Diane MacArthur, Timothy J. Chapman, Sarah E. Streicker, Michelle Kramer, and Julia Schwartz.

“Corruption by an elected official and his associates undermines the public’s confidence in our government,” said U.S. Attorney Lausch. “The indictment alleges a long-term, multifaceted scheme to use public positions for unlawful private gain. Rooting out and prosecuting the kind of corruption alleged in the indictment will always be a top priority for this office.”

“Our elected officials swear an oath to carry out the duties of their office,” said FBI SAC Buie. “When they dishonor that oath, it erodes the trust we have in our officials to do the right thing for our communities, and the FBI and its partners stand ready to stamp out corruption at any level of government.”

“IRS Criminal Investigation provides financial investigative expertise in our work with our law enforcement partners,” said IRS-CI SAC Campbell. “Our hallmark expertise in following the money trail in this type of case shows our agency is committed to rooting out public corruption. Today’s indictment underscores our commitment to this work in a collaborative effort to promote honest and ethical government at all levels, and to prosecute those who allegedly violate the public’s trust.”

The public is reminded that an indictment is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If convicted, the Court must impose reasonable sentences under federal sentencing statutes and the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.

       

104 Comments
  1. - Huh? - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:05 pm:

    Wonder who talked.


  2. - bored now - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:05 pm:

    does this mean republicans won’t be able to “run against” madigan anymore???


  3. - Pingu - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:06 pm:

    At least he’ll know a lot of folks in prison if he’s convicted


  4. - Nick - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:06 pm:

    Never thought I see the day.

    I just actually swore outloud.


  5. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:08 pm:

    == does this mean republicans won’t be able to “run against” madigan anymore???==

    lol they’ll do it even more now.


  6. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:09 pm:

    It was absolutely the right thing for Democrats to force Madigan out. He like anyone else gets a day in court, but the calculus was spot-on.


  7. - bored now - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:10 pm:

    ==lol they’ll do it even more now.==

    so will democrats.

    this is the first time i can think of where the irs was part of a public announcement…


  8. - Norseman - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:10 pm:

    === does this mean republicans won’t be able to “run against” madigan anymore??? ===

    Of course, they’ll use it. Unlike the GOP regarding it’s own corrupt elements, the Dems will note that it was their caucus who took action to end Madigan’s legislative career.


  9. - halving_fun - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:11 pm:

    about time, hallelujah

    won’t be the end of corruption in IL though


  10. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:11 pm:

    Even Paulie went down…

    … and Paulie hated phones too.


  11. - Sayitaintso - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:11 pm:

    So much for the “Velvet Hammer” bit. Mike now see’s the hammer from a very different perspective.


  12. - Wensicia - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:12 pm:

    I’m waiting for Pritzker to make a statement.


  13. - Lucky Pierre - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:13 pm:

    It took real courage for Democrats to force Madigan out down 20 runs with two outs in the bottom of the 9th inning


  14. - Illinoised - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:14 pm:

    Maybe he can bunk with Ed Burke?


  15. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:14 pm:

    Chapa-LaVia doesn’t look so foolish tossing him under the bus today :-)


  16. - de Gaulle - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:16 pm:

    A lot of commenters on this blog were swearing up and down that this day would never come. Well known ones, too.


  17. - FormerILSIP - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:16 pm:

    I’ll take the under on the comment totals compared to the Blago indictment… but how long will this thread take to get to 100 comments? 30 minutes?


  18. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:17 pm:

    ===this is the first time i can think of where the irs was part===

    It’s not common, but not rare.


  19. - Club J - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:18 pm:

    I’m waiting for Tom DeVore to take credit for brings done this corruption in the State of Illinois.


  20. - Andersonville Right Winger - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:19 pm:

    I hope Ken Griffin puts some cash money into the Illinois GOP to use this as an issue in Illinois House & Senate races in November.


  21. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:19 pm:

    “We took each other out”

    - Rauner, in Florida, probably


  22. - Former agency director - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:19 pm:

    Speaker Madigan was a terrible elected official who used his power to torment people including many harmless government employees.


  23. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:20 pm:

    == A lot of commenters on this blog were swearing up and down that this day would never come. Well known ones, too. ==

    Yep, not the first thing I was wrong about, not gonna be the last.


  24. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:21 pm:

    ===It took real courage for Democrats…===

    Rauner took him down… or… whatever…

    It’s gonna be a real mess, that’s for sure.


  25. - SAP - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:22 pm:

    Never thought I’d see the day where Rod Blagojevich is a free man and Mike Madigan in under indictment.


  26. - SWSider - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:22 pm:

    Is this the least surprising most surprising breaking news in Il politics since…. Rod? I’m trying to think of another example that seemed simultaneously predictable and obvious but was still a ‘holy cow’ moment.


  27. - Glengarry - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:24 pm:

    For the last couple of years it’s been obvious, it was always a matter of when and not if.


  28. - Revolver - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:24 pm:

    *OW makes Rauner non-sequiter, as he slowly shrinks and and transforms into a corn cob*


  29. - Rudy’s teeth - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:24 pm:

    Guess Madigan might miss the Irish Lawyers’ luncheon in honor of St. Patrick’s Day.


  30. - Huh? - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:25 pm:

    G is going to dominate the news cycle.


  31. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:25 pm:

    ===Rauner non-sequite…===

    It’s funny because it was the G, it was always gonna be the G, and folks still think it was the GOP.

    As long as it’s sweet corn…


  32. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:26 pm:

    “I hope Ken Griffin puts some cash money into the Illinois GOP to use this as an issue in Illinois House & Senate races in November.”

    Not an issue anymore. House Democrats themselves took care of it by helping push him out a year ago.


  33. - adams - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:27 pm:

    it will be amazing to see all of these democrats get real brave and real ethical now that the madigan indictment is imminent. i hope republicans hammer the madigan dems with this in the coming election. conversely, i think those 19 who stepped out and prevented him from becoming speaker again should be lauded even more today. nobody is above the law.


  34. - City Zen - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:27 pm:

    Is it too late for AFSCME 31 to ask for their $767,800 check back?


  35. - Three Dimensional Checkers - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:28 pm:

    I’m looking out for whether Doherty flipped. He was the weak link in the chain.


  36. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:31 pm:

    ==Not an issue anymore. House Democrats themselves took care of it by helping push him out a year ago. ==

    Wouldn’t go that far, but the fact that he’s a *Former* Speaker and that Dems can say they made that choice will certainly help.

    ==it will be amazing to see all of these democrats get real brave and real ethical now that the madigan indictment is imminent==

    I mean, they kicked hm out a year ago.


  37. - Donnie Elgin - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:31 pm:

    =Not an issue anymore=

    LOL, when the architect of the Dems 30-year march towards complete control of all levers of Illinois gov’t, gets publicly humiliated by the Feds it is a big deal. The Dems lip service of ” we forced him out” is such weak sauce. This will get top billing in GOP attack ads in the 2022 electiosn .


  38. - Steve - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:31 pm:

    I look forward to Madigan’s interaction with the China town deal from the billionaire that didn’t speak English??


  39. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:32 pm:

    == Not an issue anymore. House Democrats themselves took care of it by helping push him out a year ago. ==

    Guess I missed that they pushed him out for breaking the law. If you really think a year of separation makes this no longer an issue for Democrats in general in Illinois I would say good luck with that. I would suggest if that is the response you have house candidates give, that is going to work great…


  40. - Homebody - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:33 pm:

    == Never thought I’d see the day where Rod Blagojevich is a free man and Mike Madigan in under indictment. ==

    I feel pretty confident Biden won’t commute any sentences for Madigan.


  41. - Uncle Tanoos - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:34 pm:

    Any Live TV Coverage details(for outside Chicago area) ??


  42. - Pawar Lost - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:35 pm:

    I’ll celebrate when he’s folding laundry in Oxford with Ed Burke. And yes the GOP will use it as a campaign issue in November. they should.


  43. - AD - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:35 pm:

    ===Not an issue anymore. House Democrats themselves took care of it by helping push him out a year ago.===

    In other words: “We went along with it for 40 years, but since we pushed him out when the public pressure got too high, that should be good enough.”

    Some House Dems deserve some credit, but this thing will be tied around every Illinois Democrat in the next election cycle and there isn’t a great answer to it for them.


  44. - SWSider - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:36 pm:

    I also love that Burke and Madigan have between them approximately 5000 years to learn how to use the government to grift, but still manage to (allegedly) get caught doing penny ante stuff at the age most men are playing with grandchildren.


  45. - Pizza Man - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:38 pm:

    Due in large part to ComEd…”Lights out: Mr. Madigan!”


  46. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:39 pm:

    Looking forward to the Governor getting asked about that.


  47. - Nick - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:39 pm:

    Those are some *awkward* quotes for Pritzker


  48. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:40 pm:

    The Seidel tweets… whew.


  49. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:40 pm:

    ===Looking forward to the Governor getting asked about that===

    Oh, I already have.


  50. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:40 pm:

    Also sounds like the 13th Ward and CFR will have something in common…


  51. - Huh? - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:41 pm:

    The former Speaker was feared, not revered. The applause from Dem members, even those without the courage to vote him off of the island will be as robust as from the GOP.

    His surrogate for most things in the House, Tim Mapes, was easily the most hated man in Springfield by all members regardless of party affiliation. A truly small, petty man entirely empowered by the former Speaker.

    Most Dems will regret only that Mapes won’t be sharing the cell next to Madigan.


  52. - Suburban Mom - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:42 pm:

    Literally gasped aloud when I got the news alert, never thought I’d actually see it happen.


  53. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:43 pm:

    ==If you really think a year of separation makes this no longer an issue for Democrats in general in Illinois I would say good luck with that.==

    Again, I wouldn’t go so far as “not an issue”, but voters have shockingly short memories.


  54. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:43 pm:

    It could be much larger to a bigger story and wider net… than just focusing on what is “happening to MJM”

    Watch what does happen… this time… the side stories alone from the Seidel tweets, as an example…


  55. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:44 pm:

    Pritzker’s team’s reluctance to hire anyone Madigan recommended is also looking wise.


  56. - AD - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:45 pm:

    ===but voters have shockingly short memories.===

    Griffin’s $50 Million in ads on it will remind them.


  57. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:45 pm:

    “Guess I missed that they pushed him out for breaking the law.”

    Madigan wasn’t indicted then, but they had some foresight and understood what a drag he is to the party.

    “If you really think a year of separation makes this no longer an issue for Democrats in general in Illinois I would say good luck with that.”

    Republicans scream about corruption nonstop anyway, and what has that got them but super-minority status? Plus, the ILGOP has a pretty big plank in its eye to be judging others, having strongly opposed the political conviction of an ex-president who fomented an attempt to violently overthrow America.


  58. - Hahaha - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:45 pm:

    Every House target this year has taken hundreds of thousands - if not millions - of dollars Mike Madigan. JB Pritzker personally donated millions to Madigan’s operation. So yes, Madigan will definitely be used in 2022 lol.


  59. - IKnewIt - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:46 pm:

    The first domino that fell that got this rolling was Margaret Laurino. Her unexpected resignation was a sign of things to come.


  60. - low level - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:46 pm:

    == Guess I missed that they pushed him out for breaking the law. =

    Yeah, you must have been asleep. HDems began saying they would not vote for him for another term as Speaker when the ComEd defered prosecution agreement and $200MM fine came out. Although he hadnt been formally charged w a crime, HDems started publicly saying they were done w him. Guess you missed that.


  61. - City Zen - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:46 pm:

    ==House Democrats themselves took care of it by helping push him out a year ago==

    The political equivalent of “you moved the cemetery but you left the bodies.”


  62. - Ste_with_a_v_en - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:47 pm:

    It may not generate much useful campaign airtime, but for all those who voted to keep him as speaker (minus those who refused to for him) should be asked why they still wanted him to be speaker.


  63. - Steve - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:47 pm:

    There’s a nice picture of FBI mole Danny Solis with JB Pritzker and Juan Ochoa from 2018.

    tinyurl.com/2p8a88h4


  64. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:47 pm:

    ===Pritzker’s team’s reluctance to hire anyone Madigan recommended===

    Um

    https://www.wbez.org/stories/pritzker-madigan/809f86d3-4eff-413f-8c5c-cc3210a9ed9d


  65. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:47 pm:

    == The former Speaker was feared, not revered. The applause from Dem members, even those without the courage to vote him off of the island will be as robust as from the GOP. ==

    I seem to remember Rod commenting that when he was a state rep Democrats would talk a big game while drinking at bars about standing up to Madigan. Yet they accepted his help, his money, the whole 9 yards. They if anything will look worse if the answer is

    “Well yeah I supported him and did what he told me to do because that is what I had to do to get elected. I never said a word publicly while his bullies did their thing as well. But I disliked the man, even though I supported him and likely wouldn’t have been able to stay in the legislature without his support”

    Yeah, go with that Profile in Courage answer.


  66. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:49 pm:

    ==Griffin’s $50 Million in ads ==

    Will be called or raised by the other side.


  67. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:52 pm:

    ==Um==

    35 is a small fraction of the number of people that thought MJM was gonna get them a shiny new state job. Just ask around at an event at Boone’s, lol.


  68. - Former - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:52 pm:

    Pritzker and Sandoval…. https://www.senatormartinsandoval.com/images/Sandoval_and_Pritzker.jpg


  69. - OneMan - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:52 pm:

    == Yeah, you must have been asleep. HDems began saying they would not vote for him for another term as Speaker when the ComEd defered prosecution agreement and $200MM fine came out. Although he hadnt been formally charged w a crime, HDems started publicly saying they were done w him. Guess you missed that. ==

    Would have been a bit more impressed if they did that when it happened and not several months later, after the election (where he could still help them). A few were brave enough before the election, but they got virtually no support.

    But yeah, go with ‘illegal activity not outlived his usefulness.


  70. - AD - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:53 pm:

    ===Will be called or raised by the other side.===

    Griffin’s Net Worth is 8x Pritzker’s. You’re not going to out raise him.


  71. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:53 pm:

    ===35 is a small fraction===

    Fractions are not numbers.

    If you are trying to “rationalize” you’re doing it wrong.

    With respect, bud


  72. - ;) - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:53 pm:

    So we are labeling a political organization an enterprise now? Geez.


  73. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:54 pm:

    ==Griffin’s Net Worth is==

    …not Richard Irvin’s operating budget.


  74. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:54 pm:

    ===So we are labeling a political organization an enterprise now?===

    Were you around during the CFR and Fawell trial?

    This isn’t a “new” thing to see around the game.


  75. - Former director - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:55 pm:

    I wish pat botterman were here for this


  76. - low level - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:58 pm:

    == Would have been a bit more impressed if they did that when it happened==

    You really were asleep. They started coming out saying they would not vote for him when the announcement of the DPA was made. Rich covered it extensively. By the end of summer 2020, enough HDems had publicly said they would not vote to re elect in sufficient numbers to deny him another term as Speaker.

    By the time Jan 2021 came along, there was no going back.


  77. - Mike - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 3:58 pm:

    Unfortunately for the citizens of Illinois this was over 39 years to late and only scratches the surface of the crime machine he created.


  78. - Huh? - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:00 pm:

    “Yeah, go with that Profile in Courage answer.“

    They are, and always have been cowards. They knowingly allowed it by continuing to cower to and empower him. They will still be dancing in the streets. Watch closely.


  79. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:01 pm:

    Normally the Feds work up the food chain to get the Big Fish. Madigan might try to save himself by giving up schools of smaller fish. It would be like electroshocking a pond.


  80. - JS Mill - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:02 pm:

    =He like anyone else gets a day in court, but the calculus was spot-on.=

    Maybe he can hire Irvin, because he is dedicated to giving everyone their day in court.

    MJM being indicted is surprising only in the fact that he was able to avoid it for so long it seemed like it might never happen.

    If he did the deed he should pay the price.

    =It took real courage for Democrats to force Madigan out down 20 runs with two outs in the bottom of the 9th inning=

    LOL. Says the guy who goes quiet on right wing corruption and misdeeds.


  81. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:05 pm:

    ==If you are trying to “rationalize”==

    I’m not. Just saying it’s been something bothering well-connected Dems for 3 years now, that only 35 of the many, many applicants got jobs.


  82. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:10 pm:

    ==Would have been a bit more impressed if they did that when it happened and not several months later, after the election (where he could still help them). A few were brave enough before the election, but they got virtually no support.

    But yeah, go with ‘illegal activity not outlived his usefulness. ==

    This is a good explanation, but in the context of assessing Dems’ ability to use their ouster of Madigan to mitigate the political damage, we return to the old adage of “when you’re explaining, you’re losing.”


  83. - Homebody - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:10 pm:

    The number of times quotation marks appear around things that were supposedly said over the phone between McClain and Madigan makes me think there was a wiretap at some point. I’m not used to reading federal indictments though.


  84. - Back to the Future - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:16 pm:

    So proud of the Lady Marine who stood tall and put her name in for Speaker of the House.
    After she stepped up, it was just one long downhill trip for Madigan.
    At the time Pritzker and almost all the House Democrats were clearly behind the Speaker.
    We need more Democrats like her.


  85. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:16 pm:

    I’m one of the people who didn’t think this would happen, btw. Between McClain and Mapes going to the wall, I just never thought the Feds would get someone to flip.

    But here comes Danny Solis from the top rope.


  86. - thechampaignlife - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:19 pm:

    ===I feel pretty confident Biden won’t commute any sentences for Madigan.===

    But what about Trump 2.0?


  87. - Farm team - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:22 pm:

    Who is lobbyist A


  88. - NonAFSCMEStateEmployeeFromChatham - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:24 pm:

    SJ-R strikes again. On their website headlining the Madigan indictment, they misspelled his name as “Madagin.” But the correct spelling is in the story itself.


  89. - Big Dipper - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:25 pm:

    Republicans who want to make hay may need to be reminded that it was a Democratic Justice Department that brought this indictment. Unlike the last administration, everything is no longer partisan now.


  90. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:27 pm:

    Keeping Lausch as the USA looks like the best move to getting to this indictment …


  91. - Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:29 pm:

    “when you’re explaining, you’re losing”

    Imagine how it would be if Democrats re-elected Madigan as Speaker, and didn’t vote him out and help push him out of politics. It was the right thing to do. As far as current fall-out, obviously it would be much worse if Madigan was still Speaker. But, all that ended a year ago.


  92. - City Zen - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 4:45 pm:

    ==Unlike the last administration, everything is no longer partisan now.==

    You owe me a new monitor.


  93. - Happy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 5:03 pm:

    Madigan, as a young committeeman, tried to have my Grandfather, a patronage worker, fired for not upping his donation to the Ward so he could afford my dad’s tuition. My Grandpa wasn’t ultimately fired but he was stuck in place. I’m sure he’s smiling from above over this.


  94. - New Day - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 5:13 pm:

    Mike McClain is going to jail. Watch my teeny tiny tears. Don’t know if they can make this stick to Madigan but I’m will to put money on Madigan never serving a day in jail.


  95. - BlackRunningBoards - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 5:29 pm:

    Marty, Silvana, Angie, Susan investigation is not over…


  96. - Tom Clancy - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 5:33 pm:

    No big deal, he has plenty of $ to defend . But we know the party that will stay in power so who cares


  97. - goodluckMQ - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 5:35 pm:

    Looks like Marty Quinn & Cuellar are going to need to find more precinct captains.


  98. - Jose Abreu's Next Homer - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 5:44 pm:

    Are there any videos of JB dancing with Mike on stage so I can see that the next 8 months during commercial breaks?


  99. - Anyone Remember - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 6:16 pm:

    ===Mike McClain is going to jail.===

    Don’t hold your breath.


  100. - B Team - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 6:39 pm:

    Well done by the U.S. Attorneys Office of the Northern District. They worked hard and tirelessly to make this happen.


  101. - Huh? - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 6:50 pm:

    I really wish the doppelganger at 3:41 and 4:00 would find a new handle.


  102. - The worst thing - Wednesday, Mar 2, 22 @ 7:20 pm:

    Just like how Capone did a million bad things but they got him on tax evasion, I suspect this indictment is for some of the less series things Madigan has actually done.


  103. - Out of Illinois - Thursday, Mar 3, 22 @ 7:21 am:

    Bout time. One down. Hundreds more to go.


  104. - Payback - Thursday, Mar 3, 22 @ 8:55 am:

    “The first domino that fell that got this rolling was Margaret Laurino. Her unexpected resignation was a sign of things to come.” Who sez Marge’s resignation was “unexpected?” Her father Tony Laurino was under federal indictment when he died. Her brother Bill Laurino as state Rep. had like the worst attendance record in Illinois legislative history. Their time was over long ago.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Top court can't reach majority on post-primary legislative candidate slating law (Updated)
* Leave the kid alone
* Report: 'Abrupt' prisoner transfers begin at Stateville
* Uber Partners With Cities To Expand Urban Transportation
* Today's lesson
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller