|
Bears still playing stadium footsie
Friday, Jul 17, 2026 - Posted by Isabel Miller * Daily Herald…
[From Rich: Just saying, but they could’ve had property tax certainty at Soldier Field because they don’t pay any property taxes at Soldier Field.] * Related… * Northwest Indiana Times | Northwest Indiana unions vow to oppose politicians who don’t back Bears stadium food tax: Randy Palmateer, who serves as business manager and executive director of the Northwest Indiana Building and Construction Trades Council, said the 31 different trade unions that he represents and their thousands of members will not back any elected officials who do not back the food and beverage tax that would cost an extra $1 on a $100 restaurant tab — or any other aspects of the Bears stadium financing plan. […] “I just want to be clear that we’re not supporting any of those Porter County political candidates if they don’t support the Bears stadium or the food and beverage tax,” he said. “It’s just ridiculous some of the pushback we’re getting over there. We have thousands of members in Porter County. Building the stadium would mean jobs for them.” * Tribune | Can Indiana pay for a Bears stadium? Analysts ask how it will pay its debt as some residents balk at new taxes: In February, Indiana lawmakers approved a plan to spend up to $1 billion to build an enclosed stadium in Hammond for the Chicago Bears. The team pledged to pay $2 billion toward building the stadium, and would then lease the site but collect all of the operating revenue. But whether the planned taxes in the legislation would be enough to pay off the construction cost is highly uncertain, some analysts say. Just as whether the Bears will move to Indiana depends on whether Illinois will make a better offer, the financing of the Hammond site depends on a lot of unknowns. Chief among them, Propheter said, is the ultimate cost of buying land, building and maintaining a stadium and the lost opportunity of what else could be done with the money if it didn’t go toward the stadium. * NBC Chicago | Indiana officials confident in Bears’ stadium bid as focus moves to new site: Soil samples have been taken from the area and are being analyzed, and officials are hopeful that environmental issues encountered at other locations in Hammond will be addressed by shifting the project closer to the state line, with that site just 19 miles from downtown Chicago. Indiana Gov. Mike Braun, who signed the bill earlier this year aimed at luring the Bears to the state, is continuing to publicly express confidence in the chances of getting the deal finalized.
|









- DuPage Saint - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 1:54 pm:
I used to think Abe Gibron was the Bear’s worst hire but Kevin Warren has him beat
- Rahm’s Parking Meter - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 2:00 pm:
Wake us up Opening weekend of Bears season.
- Principal Skinner - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 2:07 pm:
The Macaskys and Warren want to be in IL otherwise this “will they wont they” game would stop. Because its about tangible assets and the net asset valuation of the Bears.
In real estate it’s about location, location, location. You could have the same tangible assets, Say two exact House’s, one in Arlington Heights and the other in Hammond. Which House will have a higher property value and thus a higher Net Asset Valution if your intent was to eventually sell?
- Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 2:12 pm:
Skinner, this isn’t residential real estate, especially if they are hoping to sell to a guy who is also a major Indiana casino owner.
- ChicagoBars - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 2:35 pm:
I was actually quite enjoying the last several weeks of Halas Hall being relatively silent.
- Thomas Paine - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 2:44 pm:
Rich nailed it: They have property tax certainty at Soldier field. They could have it in Arlington Heights if they transfer the land to the state and then lease it back. The Bears have made it very hard for anyone to give them what they need, because what they want is a moving target.
Notice however that Warren has dropped the demand the team own the stadium, which means reality has sunk in that’s not happening.
If they do not need to own the stadium, then we do not need Payment in Lieu of Taxes, which has mucho oppo on the left and right.
So now it just seems we follow Harmon’s course: we’re setting a up a sports authority in Arlington Heights or Chicago, Kevin. You tell us where.
- btowntruth from forgottonia - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 2:50 pm:
“Pleeeeease tax me” is an odd pitch innit?
- Flyin' Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 2:56 pm:
Sometimes we overestimate our importance to others.
Don’t spend time anywhere near the capitol, but curious to know if most pols are getting a little tired of Warren’s antics and are ready to tell him to kick rocks.
- hisgirlfriday - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 3:06 pm:
Can they make the plot of the Bears Hallmark Christmas movie about a greedy out-of-touch team CEO who plans to move the team out of state until he’s visited by the ghosts of Bears past, present, and future?
- Jibba - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 3:43 pm:
“Certainty” is not exactly what they want. They want “low” and “certain.”
- joe - Friday, Jul 17, 26 @ 4:53 pm:
Can anyone comment on why if ‘da Bear’s TRULY wanted tax certainty - as opposed to low or NO taxes as others have said - they aren’t working with Arlington and/or others to establish / expand Enterprise Zone(s) to cover the new stadium sites? All kinds of benefits | credits come with EZ Status - BUT probably have to agree to PILOT, which I guess is their problem. ???