Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » More on that Madigan memo to his members about staff
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
More on that Madigan memo to his members about staff

Wednesday, Mar 7, 2018

* Click here for background if you need it on yesterday’s memo from Speaker Madigan to his members warning them against sexually harassing or having sexual relations with staff along with Alaina Hampton’s response. Sun-Times

“He’s had two meetings with women, staff and lobbyists. One in Chicago and one in Springfield and he came with a sense and thought that it would be prudent to express that to the caucus,” Madigan spokesman Steve Brown said of Tuesday’s statement.

Madigan’s message to members — which he also released to the media — came about a week after he released a list of nine misconduct complaints that he said demonstrated his office had been there for potential harassment victims and has handled cases “according to protocol.”

And it came after he met with directors of four units of his office — the clerk’s office, issues, research and technical review divisions. Those directors are now speaking with staff on a weekly basis about whether there are any staffing issues, according to a source with close knowledge of the speaker’s office.

It also comes after Madigan met with some House Democratic women in the two private meetings. The group has been talking to lobbyists and staff members to try to both tackle sexual harassment in politics, and empower women to seek higher positions.

As for any pending legislation, Brown said the speaker is “waiting to see what kind of ideas” come from both a group headed by Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago, and State Rep. Sara Wojcicki Jimenez, R-Leland Grove – and the group of women Democratic members who have been meeting.

* Tribune

[Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago] said she wasn’t sure what prompted Madigan’s latest message, saying, “he just read it to us in that measured, deliberate tone of his.”

Others said they interpreted it as a stern warning from Madigan as he tries to move ahead on the issue. Madigan repeatedly has said he has no intentions to step aside.

Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, a Chicago Democrat who serves on Madigan’s leadership team, said the comments were “a very strong statement about a level of professionalism that he expects.”

“I believe it is a step in the right direction, a clarion call, if you will,” Feigenholtz said.

Still, Feigenholtz called the issue a “work in progress.” “I believe there is a commitment to reframe things around here,” Feigenholtz said.

* SJ-R

Meanwhile, the House’s sexual harassment task force Tuesday discussed a draft of a bill authored by House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago, and the committee’s minority spokesperson Sara Wojcicki Jimenez, R-Leland Grove, to reform state ethics and human rights law with new regulations in an attempt to decrease instances of sexual harassment and allow for a better pathway to justice for victims.

The proposals include extending the period for reporting after a rights violation from 180 days to one year, allowing anonymous reporting and creating an investigator position in more government offices.

Lobbyists and legislators debated parts of the draft, including the statute of limitation clause. As written, it would cover more than just sexual harassment allegations, a concern for an already overstretched complaint system at the Illinois Department of Human Rights and the Human Rights Commission, according to Jay Shattuck, a lobbyist for the Illinois Chamber of Commerce.

“There is a tremendous backlog … that is unfortunately detrimental … to the individuals who have been discriminated against but certainly employers who are stuck in the process for as many as six, seven years before there’s a resolution of a human rights act charge,” he said. “We think we need to address the backlog as well.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

7 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 11:25 am:

    It’s heartening to know that there have never been any sexual misconduct complaints lodged against the governmental or political crews of Rauner, Cullerton, Brady, Durkin, any of the state constitutional officers,… etc.

    Because if there had been, we’d know about it. Right?

    At this point in history, that all has to be on the table, and steps to address it must be transparent.

    Correct?

    We can all take comfort in knowing that only the Madigan crew has been accused of any sexual misconduct, ever.


  2. - Who else - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 11:37 am:

    ==We can all take comfort in knowing that only the Madigan crew has been accused of any sexual misconduct, ever.==

    Well, except for the time-honored Christmas tradition of unwanted touching that is documented on the front page of the suntimes with the headline SANTA PAWS.

    For some reason, we don’t talk about the fact that a guy who everyone knew routinely harassed and touched women found himself gently removed from his elected position and dropped into a leadership position in Rauner’s administration where he resumed his harassing behavior.

    We have to stop moving these men around. They harass staff and colleagues, so we move them into a lobbying job without addressing the damage left in their wake. The catholic church did that, too. It ended badly.


  3. - Texas Red - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 11:45 am:

    The victims words are powerful and MJM has no way to counter them…

    ““Speaker Madigan now says he is committed to getting ‘personally involved’ in preventing sexual harassment…that may prove to be a step forward — but today, it rings hollow. The Speaker had three months to get ‘personally involved’ in my case, but took no action until he knew the story was about to come out.”


  4. - anon - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 11:46 am:

    CYA

    Right now MJM employs several spouses of members of his own caucus. How does he square that circle How does MJM not have unfair control over a member whose spouse he employs?
    What is his policy on employee spouses and other relatives of members of his own caucus?


  5. - the Patriot - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 1:03 pm:

    Many a CEO, politicians, others have been forced from power for less. It appears that not even #metoo can bring down Madigan.


  6. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 1:18 pm:

    “Many a CEO, politicians, others have been forced from power for less.”

    For less than text messages they didn’t send which stopped months before they were told about them?


  7. - theCardinal - Wednesday, Mar 7, 18 @ 2:51 pm:

    Come on Word. Even if it didn’t hatch there, that’s where the bird landed. Not wanting it to be so doesnt make it go away and deflecting it to others isnt going to make it go away either. It could have been in any office any number of years ago somebody ends up wearing the jacket and this time its the speakers office.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Kinda sorta slightly good news for the state, not so much for the city, CPS and Cook
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Caption contest!
* Illinois lost 45,116 people in one year
* But his e-mails...
* The hollowing-out of state government
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller